Talk:List of Michael Jackson's awards/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have assessed this article as Start class. Though its information is highly exhaustive and complete, as far as I'm aware (and I have been a fan of Jackson's for a long time, and it looks it to me) this list is terribly poor in its layout, its sectioning and its citation of the relevant references being used and its sequence. It's chronological, which is to be used within the confines of each issuer/presenter of award (i.e. AMAs, Grammys, BRIT awards, BMI awards etc etc) and then any "minor" awawrds, or simply those that Jackson only won once twice or at worst three times, should then be listed in a neat table after all of these other sections. If however, the chronological sectioning is kept, I would highly recommend at least breaking the years into H3 type headers (that's the triple equals signs) and make H2 sections (that's the double equals signs) for the decades the years fall udner for more concise positioning, however this is not what I recommend as optimal, just simply as something that will marginally (though nowhere near fully) improve this list. --lincalinca 11:56, 7 November 2007 (UTC)