Talk:List of Mexico-Tenochtitlan rulers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Mexico-Tenochtitlan rulers article.

Article policies
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
This article is also supported by the WikiProject Aztec sub-project.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
List This article has been rated as List-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Title

Looking pretty good, Ptcamn. Re the title though, given that a few of these (particularly the latter colonial-era ones) may not have been specifically called a tlatoani, maybe the title needs amending? To what, I'm not sure, however. Also- a minor quibble: if we're going to make the city the focus, perhaps it should be Mexico-Tenochtitlan (hyphenated)...? --cjllw ʘ TALK 03:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

It's true that some of the later ones weren't tlatoque, but I don't have a problem with including them anyway — List of English monarchs includes Oliver Cromwell, despite not being a king. Still, I guess it couldn't hurt to move it to a more it to more a generic title List of rulers of Mexico Tenochtitlan.
I'd thought Mexico-Tenochtitlan was more common unhyphenated than not, but checking Google Books now it seems like the hyphenated form is more common. So List of rulers of Mexico-Tenochtitlan? --Ptcamn 04:22, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I suppose so, though personally I find the "List of..of" repetition awkward. It seems there's no particular standard for this, Cat:Lists of monarchs has a bunch of these, but also others along the lines of List of Foo rulers or even Foo/Fooian rulers. I note that although the Lists guideline suggests List of..." is generally required, there are argued cases where it may be omitted. Anyways - how about List of Mexico-Tenochtitlan rulers, would that be sufficiently unambiguous? List of Aztec rulers would be ambiguous given other rulers of provinces/cities, while List of Aztec emperors might not describe the colonial successors.--cjllw ʘ TALK 03:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
List of Mexico-Tenochtitlan rulers has the advantage of matching the Nahuatl: they're referred to as tlatoani tenochtitlan (lit. "tlatoani at Tenochtitlan") rather than itlatocauh tenochtitlan ("tlatoani of Tenochtitlan").
List of Tenochca rulers is another possibility. --Ptcamn 06:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
ok. So let's go with List of Mexico-Tenochtitlan rulers, then.
BTW- the Huey tlatoani article prob needs revising and expansion to be more on the office itself, to distinguish it more from this list of office holders.--cjllw ʘ TALK 09:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)