Talk:List of Hewitts and Nuttalls in England

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
An entry from List of Hewitts and Nuttalls in England appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 26 April 2007.
Wikipedia

[edit] Pennines

I am a little confused by the division of the Pennines employed here, into East, West, North, South, Yorkshire Dales and Peak District. To my mind, the Pennines are divided into North (between A66 and A69, roughly), Yorkshire Dales (inc. Howgill Fells; A66 to A59), and the South Pennines, which may or may not include the Peak District, but does include from Winter Hill to Ilkley Moor. Calling Wensleydale "South Pennines" and Burnhope Seat "East Pennines" seems very odd indeed. Does this scheme follow a published source? Do the Nuttalls do it like this? --Stemonitis 09:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

As I mentioned here, I'm not convinced by this either. The areas are the same ones that the Nuttalls use, but the names are not entirely. The Nuttalls have:
  • The seven Wainwright regions (in the order N, NW, W, C, S, E, FE)
  • The Cheviots
  • North Pennines — the Western Fells (Cross Fell etc.)
  • North Pennines — the Eastern Fells (Burnhope Seat etc.)
  • Yorkshire Dales — the Northern Fells (Great Shunner Fell etc.)
  • Yorkshire Dales — the Southern Fells (Whernside etc.)
  • The Peak District and Dartmoor
The Nuttalls don't have a two-level region structure. I think the one I applied on the Welsh list improved it; I don't know that this one has. I think the root of the problem is that "The Pennines" means two things: it means the long mountain range that stretches from Northumberland to the Midlands (and may or may not include the Cheviots and Peaks); but it also means, to me at least, the smaller section between the A66 and A69 that doesn't have a name of it's own. So the main section heading used the term in the former sense; the three subsections, the latter sense. Not ideal, I realise.
I didn't adopt the Nuttalls' names because, to me, the Yorkshire Dales is the area between Skipton and Wensleydale, despite the Howgills, etc., are part of the national park of that name. But perhaps that's just a consequence of the part of Yorkshire I grew up in. — ras52 10:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[Edit conflict] Right. I think the divisions I suggested before are closer to common usage. Certainly, the OS maps follow that scheme: OL21 (South Pennines) covers Marsden to Barnoldswick, while OL31 (North Pennines) covers Bowes to Alston (cf. North Pennines AONB). I don't see any need to divide the North Pennines into two subgroups — the Southern Fells of the Lake District is just as long a table. Pennines doesn't mention a possible second interpretation, and it's not one that I've come across before. I would like to hear what others have to say, but I would advocate the following:

  • Cheviots
  • Lake District (divided along Wainwright's lines)
  • Pennines
  • North Pennines
  • Yorkshire Dales
  • Peak District
  • Dartmoor

This is closer to the Nuttalls' scheme, and to (my perception of) common usage. --Stemonitis 10:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Is that an improvement now? — ras52 10:46, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I've shifted the Cheviots out of the Pennines, but apart from that, I'm happy with it now. I think two levels of headings are clearer than three, but it's only a weak preference. Thanks. --Stemonitis 10:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
I hadn't thought of the Cheviots as part of the Pennines either, but according to the Pennines article, the Pennines "form an unbroken range stretching from the Peak District in the Midlands, through the Yorkshire Dales, parts of Greater Manchester, the West Pennine Moors of Lancashire and Cumbrian Fells to the Cheviot Hills on the Scottish border." But if it's arguing the Cumbrian Fells are part of the Pennines, it's clearly using a very broad definition. Anyway, I'm happy with it as you've changed it. — ras52 11:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Counts

It would be nice if, in the intro paragraph, the number of Hewitts, Nuttalls, and Marilyns was shown (i.e., "There are a total of X Hewitts and Y Nuttalls, with Z of them additionally classified as Marilyns."). howcheng {chat} 16:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Added. The numbers I have written there are based solely on the numbers of rows of different colours in the tables, so if anyone makes any changes to the tables (adding or removing peaks, or changing their status), they will have to update the counts accordingly. --Stemonitis 16:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm. In that case, I think we have an error. The Nuttalls' book list 251, and there are the two new ones (Honister Crag & Birks Fell). The TAC Hewitt booklet lists 178 to which Birks Fell should be added. So we seem to have gained a Nuttall and a Hewitt. Or more likely, two hills listed twice. I can't immediately find them… — ras52 08:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Black Mountain? --Stemonitis 09:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Did you include the Black Mountain in your count? It's not in the tables here, just noted in Note 3. Also Viewing Hill was listed twice. — ras52 09:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
It is in the tables here. I found Viewing Hill as well, but removed the other one of the pair; it should be fixed now. --Stemonitis 09:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
So, is 254, counting Black Mountain (and there's no good reason why one wouldn't one count it), the right number? Shall I change the DYK entry to 254 / 179? --Stemonitis 09:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Oh, I hadn't noticed the BM had been added. Sorry about that. The Nuttall's 251+2 does not include the BM, so 254 is accurate; the 178+1 Hewitts does include the BM, so that is now correct too. If you could change the DYK entry, that would be good. — ras52 09:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Done. --Stemonitis 09:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I hope nobody minds that I have corrected the name listed for Gregory Chapel (Yorkshire Dales,, Northern Fells) - it was shown as Archie Styrigg. But for reasons outlined in the new article, this "alternative name" is not correct for the actual high point, even though for some reason it seems to be the more popular alternative among hill walkers. OldFaw (talk) 14:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)