Talk:List of Curb Your Enthusiasm episodes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Screenshots
If you want to add any of the images back they must contain a Fair Use rationale. This must detail how the image adds significantly to the article (not just it identifies the episode, lots of things, including the title, identify the episode). Remember, Fair Use is for critical commentary, and should be used as sparingly as possible. I imagine for a lot of these images it won't be possible to justify them. ed g2s • talk 00:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- I will try to write fair use rationales for each and will make sure they are "justified" or we just won't use them. But I suppose my hard work won't be valued since they'll just end up getting deleted by you all over again. Sfufan2005 02:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- This isn't about recognising "hard work". If someone spent hours and hours sourcing screenshots and uploaded them without rationale they would still be deleted. If you really want to spend your time writing rationales, it might be better spent writing them for the episode articles, where there may be enough critical commentary to properly justify using an image. When you have tiny plot summaries, the only purpose the image serves is to jog people's memory and make the page look pretty, neither of which are covered by our policy. ed g2s • talk 14:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- I feel sorry for you, Sfufan2005. --thedemonhog talk contributions 04:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- This isn't about recognising "hard work". If someone spent hours and hours sourcing screenshots and uploaded them without rationale they would still be deleted. If you really want to spend your time writing rationales, it might be better spent writing them for the episode articles, where there may be enough critical commentary to properly justify using an image. When you have tiny plot summaries, the only purpose the image serves is to jog people's memory and make the page look pretty, neither of which are covered by our policy. ed g2s • talk 14:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The End
About the last episode in season 5: "Larry is changed by a trip to Arizona, to Richard Lewis’ profound relief. Larry also finds out the truth of whether or not he is adopted. Larry dies.". On my DVD set, he actually lives. Maybe this was changed when they decided to do another season? Kms 21:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- He always lived. The joke was that he wasn't even content with Heaven, so they sent him back. That ending was always on the aired episode. 204.115.253.51 17:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] End of Series 6
Why does the episode guide declare that Larry and Lorreta having a romantic relationship is merely fantasy? This falsely implies conclusion on what is still a highly contested question. It's just as reasonable to assume the final montage was a flash forward to actual occurences in the CYE story.
- I thought it was meant to be what actually happened, so I was surprised to see that. The show doesn't usually employ imagination or dream-sequences, the closest it gets is flashbacks (which are nonetheless real events) and that one instance where Larry goes to Heaven, which although not 'realistic' as such, I took to be 'real' in the show. I don't know how the Loretta thing would work with future seasons though. Perhaps it would be best to change the description to something objective, 'we see a montage of Larry and Loretta's married life' or something like that, something that describes what we see without applying an interpretation to it.194.80.66.173 17:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I think absent any further comment from people wishing to retain the overly definitive text as it currently is, I will make the change as you proposed. You make a very salient point that dream sequences are rarely used in the series; in that Larry's sojourn in heaven was clearly meant to have occurred within the CYE's narrative realm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.31.240.92 (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
what if we just don't spoil it at all and just say "Larry moves on to find an unexpected romance for himself?" or something. like when we don't say whether he is adopted or not and we just say he finds out. some people get pretty religious about that kinda thing.76.27.215.219 (talk) 09:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Unnecessary
Are the pages this page links to - the pages about individual episodes - really necessary? Most pages on wikipedia aren't there for any purpose other than to just give someone an opportunity to say, "Yay! I made a wikipedia page!"
Seriously, what use could these pages possibly be of? If people want to know the plots then they can just watch the episodes. Even then, I can't really imagine why someone would need to have a written version of the plots. It's totally stupid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.54.204.220 (talk) 07:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
calm down. it's for information. it's for people that want to know what basic things happened in each episode. some people don't watch the shows and just read about them. there is a vast range of mentalities of people in the world. we don't need to split hairs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.27.215.219 (talk) 09:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
