Talk:List of Comics Journal interview subjects
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page. | ||||
| List | This article has been rated as List-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here. | ||||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||||
|
|||||
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Information was taken from my personal stack of Comics Journals (about 75cm worth) filling in recent gaps with this listing on the TCJ site. The Fantagraphics Store does list interview subjects for back issues it stocks but I don't trust the accuracy of this source.
I will add a list of the issues in my collection once I've sorted them!
Peteashton 00:50, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
These are the issues I've checked, as above: 27, 38, 40, 43, 45 - 48, 51, 57, 64, 65, 67 ,71, 74, 75, 80, 85, 86, 90, 104, 106, 109, 112 - 114, 119, 120, 122 - 124, 127, 128, 130, 132, 135, 137 - 142, 144, 150 - 152, 154, 159, 162 - 165, 168, 169, 171 - 173, 176, 178 - 180, 184 - 206, 208 - 210, 212 - 219, 221, 223, 231 - 233, 237, 238, 240 - 250, 252 - 265, 267 - 269
Peteashton 21:44, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
The person who nominated this article for deletion, against all policy, hasn't bothered to justify his nomination.
I will give him 24 hours to do so, after which I shall take down the AFD template. Rhinoracer 21:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sorting by date and issue#
Is there some kind of wiki-related doohickey to sort the interviews by date or issue#? The default alphabetical view is handy, but is difficult if a reader is curious about who was interviewed lately, or which TCJ issues haven't been indexed.
Probably such a scheme would require the existing data be re-entered, but it'd be worth it. All the better if the listing "engine" were extensible, so new fields might be added, like time of interview, (some interviews were old or posthumous when published), name of interviewer, location, etc.
I guess it boils down to having little localized databases within articles. --AC (talk) 08:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
