Talk:Lisa the Beauty Queen/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations! Lisa the Beauty Queen has met all the criteria to become a good article. Thanks to all who contributed! I will leave the updating of the talk page templates to the top contributor. Limetolime talk to me • look what I did! 20:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Please take a look at Lisa the Skeptic. It is a featured article, and if users use this as a guide, Lisa the Beauty Queen will become an FA in no time! Limetolime talk to me • look what I did! 00:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
