Talk:Lisa Williams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.

If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Biographical information note

I'm not putting this on the page itself, but wanted to note that in an interview which appeared in an Oklahoma City newspaper on October 7, 2007, Williams is quoted as saying she's a single mother. However, her husband Kevin (presumably Charlie's father) is featured each week in the series. What's her marital status? Here's the link: http://newsok.com/article/3138832/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.207.254 (talk) 07:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Category change

Categories have been changed in accordance with the recent Arbitration on the paranormal, specifically 6a) Adequate framing, and Cultural artefacts. Martin^phi _{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 21:07, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removed last two sentences

Removed the following: "Some people believe she is a con artist who preys on people's emotions and their desire to communicate with lost loved ones. These same people think Lisa Williams should be ashamed of herself for taking advantage of other people's gullibility." as it seems to be a thinly veiled attack rather than encyclopedic material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.150.108 (talk) 20:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)