Talk:Lisa D'Amato
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Note: Random comments about wanting to be a model are not what the talk page is for. Thanks.
Contents |
[edit] Unsourced Info
-
- "It should also be noted that the week of Lisa's elimination, the top models did a photoshoot in which Lisa excelled. She did so well in fact, that the art director stopped the shoot so that the other models could see Lisa's amazing poses. Upon doing so, the art director gave each model, with the exception of Lisa, ten additional frames, thus giving them an advantage." removed this because there is no evidence for this Jubella 21:21, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Jubella
[edit] Trivia
- First caucasian contestant to win "CoverGirl of The Week."
- First non-winning America's Next Top Model contestant to appear on a future season (Cycle 6, Episode 5.)
- Favourite Food: ezekial toast
Trivia is considered unencyclopaedic. These sections are being removed from Wikipedia. If any of the facts are siginificant work them into the body of the article. Doc 18:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Magazine
Why did you removed Magazine from Elle Girl?? Lil Flip246 18:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- because it is incorrect. The magazine is called just ELLEgirl. Speaking of which it should be wikied and even the article here is just that. Doc 18:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- But it's a magazine, so shouldn't it state so? Lil Flip246 18:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- No. If it is wikied then that will be selfevident to anyone that doen't know that. Doc 18:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- But it's a magazine, so shouldn't it state so? Lil Flip246 18:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Factual Accuracy Tag
I realize it's hard to find sources for modeling gigs. However, the information in the Before Top Model section is simply not reliable. I'm keeping it here for the benefit of the doubt, but if sources aren't found quickly, I will remove it. Elcda0 23:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Considering any person who has previous, extensive modelling experience is not allowed on the show, I would doubt those are legit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.134.196.40 (talk) 21:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Controversy
I've excised the controversy section, which was atrociously written and had major POV problems. In addition, the actual content does not seem encyclopedic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.146.24.74 (talk • contribs)
- What part of the article does seem encyclopedic? It's astounding to me that this article survived AfD. The things that pass for knowledge, I can't understand. -- Mikeblas 02:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- It is because the article is good enough and Take note! a reality tv contestant doesn't need to make the final five just to have an article here like Rupert Boneham and those American Idol contestants, right huh.--hottie 14:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)