List of paradoxes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of paradoxes, grouped thematically. Note that many of the listed paradoxes have a clear resolution—see Quine's Classification of Paradoxes.

Contents

[edit] Logical (except mathematical)

Main article: Logic

[edit] Self-referential

These paradoxes have in common a contradiction arising from self-reference.

  • Berry paradox: The phrase "the first number not nameable in under ten words" appears to name it in nine words.
  • Curry's paradox: "If this sentence is true, the world will end in a week."
  • Epimenides paradox: A Cretan says "All Cretans are liars".
  • Exception paradox: "If there is an exception to every rule, then every rule must have at least one exception, the exception to this one being that it has no exception."
  • Grelling-Nelson paradox: Is the word "heterological", meaning "not applicable to itself," a heterological word? (Another close relative of Russell's paradox.)
  • Intentionally blank page: Many documents contain pages on which the text "This page is intentionally blank" is printed, thereby making the page not blank.
  • Liar paradox: "This sentence is false." This is the canonical self-referential paradox. Also "Is the answer to this question no?"
  • The Y combinator in the lambda calculus and combinatory logic has been called the paradoxical combinator since it is related to the self-referential antinomies.
  • Petronius' paradox: "Moderation in all things, including moderation."
  • Quine's paradox: "yields a falsehood when appended to its own quotation" yields a falsehood when appended to its own quotation.
  • Paradox of the Court: A law student agrees to pay his teacher after winning his first case. The teacher then sues the student (who has not yet won a case) for payment.
  • Russell's paradox: Does the set of all those sets that do not contain themselves contain itself? Russell popularized it with the Barber paradox: The adult male barber who shaves all men who do not shave themselves, and no-one else.
  • Richard's paradox: We appear to be able to use simple English to define a decimal expansion in a way which is self-contradictory.

[edit] Vagueness

  • Ship of Theseus (a.k.a. George Washington's or Grandfather's old axe): It seems like you can replace any component of a ship, and it will still be the same ship. So you can replace them all, or one at a time, and it will still be the same ship. But then you can take all the original pieces, and assemble them into a ship. That, too, is the same ship you started with.
  • Sorites paradox: One grain of sand is not a heap. If you don't have a heap, then adding only one grain of sand won't give you a heap. Then no number of grains of sand will make a heap. Similarly, one hair can't make the difference between being bald and not being bald. But then if you remove one hair at a time, you will never become bald. Also similar, one dollar will not make you rich, so if you keep this up, one dollar at a time, you will never become rich, no matter how much you obtain.

[edit] Mathematical and statistical

The Monty Hall paradox: which door do you choose?
The Monty Hall paradox: which door do you choose?
See also: Category:Mathematics paradoxes
  • Apportionment paradox: Some systems of apportioning representation can have unintuitive results due to rounding
    • Alabama paradox: Increasing the total number of seats might shrink one block's seats.
    • New states paradox: Adding a new state or voting block might increase the number of votes of another.
    • Population paradox: A fast-growing state can lose votes to a slow-growing state.
  • Arithmetic paradoxes: Proofs of obvious contradictions; for example, "proving" that 2=1 by writing a huge expression and dividing by another expression that evaluates to zero.
  • Arrow's paradox/Voting paradox: Given more than two choices, no system can have all the attributes of an ideal voting system at once.
  • Benford's law: In lists of numbers from many real-life sources of data, the leading digit 1 occurs much more often than the others.
  • Condorcet's paradox: A group of separately rational individuals may have preferences which are irrational in the aggregate.
  • Elevator paradox: Elevators can seem to be mostly going in one direction, as if they were being manufactured in the middle of the building and being disassembled on the roof and basement.
  • Inspection paradox: Why you will wait longer for that bus than you should.
  • Interesting number paradox: The first number that can be considered "dull" rather than "interesting" becomes interesting because of that fact.
  • Intransitive dice: You can have three dice, called A, B, and C, such that A is likely to win in a roll against B, B is likely to win in a roll against C, and C is likely to win in a roll against A.
  • Lindley's paradox: tiny errors in the null hypothesis are magnified when large data sets are analyzed, leading to false but highly statistically significant results
  • Low birth weight paradox: Low birth weight and mothers who smoke contribute to a higher mortality rate. Babies of smokers have lower average birth weight, but low birth weight babies born to smokers have a lower mortality rate than other low birth weight babies. (A special case of Simpson's paradox.)
  • Missing dollar paradox: Faulty logic makes it appear as if a dollar from a restaurant bill has gone missing. Not in the same class as the others.
  • Statistical paradox: It is quite possible to draw wrong conclusions from correlation. For example, towns with a larger number of churches generally have a higher crime rate — because both result from higher population. A professional organization once found that economists with a Ph.D. actually had a lower average salary than those with a BS — but this was found to be due to the fact that those with a Ph.D. worked in academia, where salaries are generally lower. This is also called a spurious relationship.
  • Will Rogers phenomenon: the mathematical concept of an average, whether defined as the mean or median, leads to apparently paradoxical results — for example, it is possible that moving an entry from an encyclopedia to a dictionary would increase the average entry length on both books.
  • Smallest number paradox describes how a rolling object should be able to attain a velocity of the smallest positive number.

[edit] Probability

See also: Category:Probability theory paradoxes
  • Berkson's paradox: a complicating factor arising in statistical tests of proportions
  • Bertrand's paradox (probability): Different common-sense definitions of randomness give quite different results.
  • Birthday paradox: What is the chance that two people in a room have the same birthday?
  • Borel's paradox: Conditional probability density functions are not invariant under coordinate transformations.
  • Boy or Girl: A two-child family has at least one boy. What is the probability that it has a girl?
  • Monty Hall problem: An unintuitive consequence of conditional probability.
  • Necktie Paradox : A wager between two people seems to favour them both. Very similar in essence to the Two-envelope paradox.
  • Simpson's paradox: An association in sub-populations may be reversed in the population. It appears that two sets of data separately support a certain hypothesis, but, when considered together, they support the opposite hypothesis.
  • Sleeping Beauty problem: A probability problem that can be correctly answered as one half or one third depending on how the question is approached.
  • Three cards problem: When pulling a random card, how do you determine the color of the underside?
  • Two-envelope paradox: You are given two indistinguishable envelopes and you are told one contains twice as much money as the other. You may open one envelope, examine its contents, and then, without opening the other, choose which envelope to take.

[edit] Infinity

[edit] Geometry and topology

The Banach–Tarski paradox: A ball can be decomposed and reassembled into two balls the same size as the original.
The Banach–Tarski paradox: A ball can be decomposed and reassembled into two balls the same size as the original.
  • Banach–Tarski paradox: Cut a ball into 5 pieces, re-assemble the pieces to get two balls, both of equal size to the first.
  • Dehn: It is not possible to transform a regular tetrahedron into a parallelepiped by cutting it into polyhedral pieces.
  • Gabriel's Horn or Torricelli's trumpet: A simple object with finite volume but infinite surface area. Also, the Mandelbrot set and various other fractals are covered by a finite shape, but have an infinite perimeter (in fact, there are no two distinct points on the boundary of the Mandelbrot set that can be reached from one another by moving a finite distance along that boundary, which also implies that in a sense you go no further if you walk "the wrong way" around the set to reach a nearby point).
  • Hausdorff paradox: There exists a countable subset C of the sphere S such that S\C is equidecomposable with two copies of itself.
  • Coastline paradox: the perimeter of a landmass is in general ill-defined
Smale's paradox states that it is possible to turn a sphere inside out in 3-space with possible self-intersections but without creating any crease.  One such construction, a Morin surface, seen from "above".
Smale's paradox states that it is possible to turn a sphere inside out in 3-space with possible self-intersections but without creating any crease. One such construction, a Morin surface, seen from "above".
  • Smale's paradox: A sphere can, topologically, be turned inside out.
  • Missing square puzzle: Two similar figures appear to have different areas while built from the same pieces.
  • No Shortcuts paradox: The length of the hypotenuse in a right triangle is not shorter than the sum of the two axis-parallel legs, i.e., the direct connection between two points (which should amount to the euclidean distance) is not shorter than a path with segments that are orthogonal to each other (which amounts to the Manhattan distance). See this reference.

[edit] Decision theoretic

Main article: Decision theory
  • Abilene paradox: People can make decisions based not on what they actually want to do, but on what they think that other people want to do, with the result that everybody decides to do something that nobody really wants to do, but only what they thought that everybody else wanted to do.
  • Buridan's ass: How can a rational choice be made between two outcomes of equal value?
  • Control paradox: Man can never be free of control, for to be free of control is to be controlled by oneself.
  • Morton's fork: Choosing between unpalatable alternatives.
  • Paradox of hedonism: When one pursues happiness itself, one is miserable; but, when one pursues something else, one achieves happiness.
  • Newcomb's paradox: How do you play a game against an omniscient opponent?
  • Kavka's toxin puzzle: Can one intend to drink the non-deadly toxin, if the intention is the only thing needed to get the reward?

[edit] Chemical

  • SAR paradox: Exceptions to the principle that a small change in a molecule causes a small change in its chemical behavior are frequently profound.
  • The Levinthal paradox : The length of time in which a protein chain finds its folded state is many orders of magnitude shorter than it would be if it freely searched all possible configurations.

[edit] Physical

Main article: physical paradox
Robert Boyle's self-flowing flask fills itself in this diagram, but perpetual motion machines cannot exist.
Robert Boyle's self-flowing flask fills itself in this diagram, but perpetual motion machines cannot exist.

[edit] Philosophical

  • Epicurean paradox: The existence of evil seems to be incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent and caring God.
  • Newcomb's paradox: A paradoxical game between two players, one of whom can predict the actions of the other.
  • Grandfather paradox: You travel back in time and kill your grandfather before he meets your grandmother which precludes your own conception and, therefore, you couldn't go back in time and kill your grandfather.
  • Hutton's Paradox: If asking oneself "Am I dreaming?" in a dream proves that one is, what does it prove in waking life?
  • Liberal paradox: It is impossible to have both a commitment to "Minimal Liberty", and Pareto optimality.
  • Mere addition paradox: Is a large population barely tolerably living life better than a small happy population?
  • Moore's paradox: "It's raining, but I don't believe that it is."
  • Nihilist paradox: If truth does not exist, the statement "truth does not exist" is a truth, thereby proving itself incorrect.
  • Omnipotence paradox: Can an omnipotent being create a rock too heavy to lift?
  • Paradox of hedonism: In seeking happiness, one does not find happiness.
  • Predestination paradox: A man travels back in time to discover the cause of a famous fire. While in the building where the fire started, he accidentally knocks over a kerosene lantern and causes a fire, the same fire that would inspire him, years later, to travel back in time. The ontological paradox is closely tied to this, in which as a result of time travel, information or objects appear to have no beginning.
  • Zeno's paradoxes: "You will never reach point B from point A as you must always get half-way there, and half of the half, and half of that half, and so on..." (This is also a paradox of the infinite)

[edit] Economic

See also: Category:Economics paradoxes

[edit] See also