List of disproved mathematical ideas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics, at least in modern times, most ideas are not accepted as fact until they have been rigorously proved. However, there have been some ideas that were fairly accepted in the past but which were subsequently showed to be false. This article is meant to serve as a repository for compiling a list of such ideas.
- The idea of the Pythagoreans that all numbers can be expressed as a ratio of two whole numbers. This was disproved by one of Pythagoras' own disciples, Hippasos, who showed that the square root of two is what we today call an irrational number. One story claims that he was thrown off the ship in which he and some other Pythagoreans were sailing because his discovery was too heretical.
- Euclid's Parallel Postulate stated that if, in a plane, two lines cross a third in such a way that the sum of the "interior angles" is not 180° then the two lines meet. Furthermore, he assumed (without stating it) that two separate intersecting lines meet at only one point. These assumptions were believed to be true for more than 2000 years, but in light of General Relativity at least the second can no longer be considered true. In fact the very notion of a straight line in four-dimensional curved space-time has to be redefined, which one can do as a geodesic. (But the notion of a plane does not carry over.) It is now recognized that Euclidean geometry can be studied as a mathematical abstraction, but that the universe is non-Euclidean.
- According to [1], the Chinese believed that all numbers of the form
(what we call Fermat numbers) were prime. Fermat also conjectured this. However, this was disproved by Euler, and in fact probably only the first five (3, 5, 17, 257, & 65537) are prime.
- The idea that transcendental numbers were the exception. Disproved by Georg Cantor who showed that there are so many transcendental numbers that it is impossible to make a one-to-one mapping between them and the algebraic numbers. In other words, the cardinality of the set of transcendentals (denoted
) is greater than that of the set of algebraic numbers (
).
- Bernhard Riemann, at the end of his famous 1859 paper On the Number of Primes Less Than a Given Magnitude, stated (based on his results) that the logarithmic integral gives a somewhat too high estimate of the prime-counting function. The evidence also seemed to indicate this. However, in 1914 J. E. Littlewood proved that this was not always the case, and in fact it is now known that the first x for which
occurs somewhere before 10317. See Skewes' number for more detail.
- It was conjectured in 1919 by George Pólya, based on the evidence, that most numbers less than any particular limit have an odd number of prime factors. However, this Pólya conjecture was disproved in 1958. It turns out that for some values of the limit (such as values a bit more than 906 million), most numbers less than the limit have an even number of prime factors.
- Erik Christopher Zeeman tried for 7 years to prove that one cannot untie a knot on a 4-sphere. Then one day he decided to try to prove the opposite, and succeeded in a few hours.[1]
[edit] See also
List of conjectures for other disproved conjectures, which were not necessarily generally accepted as true before being disproved.
[edit] References
- ^ Why mathematics is beautiful in New Scientist, 21 July 2007, p. 48
