List of animals displaying homosexual behavior

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two New York Central Park Zoo's male chinstrap penguins, similar to those pictured, became internationally known when they coupled and later were given an egg that needed hatching and care, which they successfully did.
Two New York Central Park Zoo's male chinstrap penguins, similar to those pictured, became internationally known when they coupled and later were given an egg that needed hatching and care, which they successfully did.[1]

This list includes animals (birds, mammals, insects, fish, etc.) for which there is documented evidence of homosexual or transgender behavior of one or more of the following kinds: sex, courtship, affection, pair bonding, or parenting, as noted in researcher and author Bruce Bagemihl's 1999 book Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity.

Bagemihl writes that the presence of same-sex sexual behavior was not 'officially' observed on a large scale until the 1990s due to possible observer bias caused by social attitudes towards LGBT people making the homosexual theme taboo.[2][3] Bagemihl devotes three chapters; Two Hundred Years at Looking at Homosexual Wildlife, Explaining (Away) Animal Homosexuality and Not For Breeding Only in his 1999 book Biological Exuberance to the "documentation of systematic prejudices" where he notes "the present ignorance of biology lies precisely in its single-minded attempt to find reproductive (or other) "explanations" for homosexuality, transgender, and non-procreative and alternative heterosexualities.[4] Petter Bøckman, academic adviser for the Against Nature? exhibit states

"[M]any researchers have described homosexuality as something altogether different from sex. They must realise that animals can have sex with who they will, when they will and without consideration to a researcher's ethical principles".

Homosexual behavior is widespread amongst social birds and mammals, particularly the sea mammals and the primates.[3]

"No species has been found in which homosexual behaviour has not been shown to exist, with the exception of species that never have sex at all, such as sea urchins and aphis. Moreover, a part of the animal kingdom is hermaphroditic, truly bisexual. For them, homosexuality is not an issue."

Petter Bøckman[3]

Animal sexual behavior takes many different forms, even within the same species and the motivations for and implications of their behaviors have yet to be fully understood. Bagemihl's research shows that homosexual behavior, not necessarily sex, has been observed in close to 1500 species, ranging from primates to gut worms, and is well documented for 500 of them.[5][6]

Homosexuality in animals is seen as controversial because some assert it points to the naturalness of homosexuality in humans, while others counter that it has no implications and is nonsensical to use animal behavior to justify what is or is not immoral.[7][8] Animal preference and motivation is always inferred from behaviour. Thus homosexual behaviour has been given a number of terms over the years. The correct usage of the term homosexual is that an animal exhibits homosexual behaviour, however this article conforms to the usage by modern research[9][10][11][12] applying the term homosexuality to all sexual behaviour (copulation, genital stimulation, mating games and sexual display behaviour) between animals of the same sex.

Contents

Revisions and sourced additions are welcome.

[edit] Selected images

The asexual, all-female Whiptail lizard species Cnemidophorus neomexicanus (center), which reproduces via parthenogenesis, is shown flanked by two sexual species having males, C. inornatus (left) and C. tigris (right). Research has shown that simulated mating behavior increases fertility for Cnemidophorus neomexicanus. One female lies on top of another, playing the role of the male, the lizard that was on bottom has larger eggs. The lizards switch off this role each mating season.
The asexual, all-female Whiptail lizard species Cnemidophorus neomexicanus (center), which reproduces via parthenogenesis, is shown flanked by two sexual species having males, C. inornatus (left) and C. tigris (right). Research has shown that simulated mating behavior increases fertility for Cnemidophorus neomexicanus. One female lies on top of another, playing the role of the male, the lizard that was on bottom has larger eggs. The lizards switch off this role each mating season.[13]
The head of Darner dragonfly (Basiaeschna janata). Male homosexuality has been inferred in several species of dragonflies. A survey of damsel and dragonflies reveals characteristic cloacal pincher mating damage in 20–80 percent of the males indicating a fairly high occurrence of sexual coupling between males.
The head of Darner dragonfly (Basiaeschna janata). Male homosexuality has been inferred in several species of dragonflies. A survey of damsel and dragonflies reveals characteristic cloacal pincher mating damage in 20–80 percent of the males indicating a fairly high occurrence of sexual coupling between males.[14][15]

[edit] Mammals

[edit] Birds

[edit] Fish

Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) leaping for a fly fisherman's bait. Research going back to the 1950s has shown both male and female Graylings exhibit homosexual behavior.
Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) leaping for a fly fisherman's bait. Research going back to the 1950s has shown both male and female Graylings exhibit homosexual behavior.[16]


[edit] Other vertebrates

[edit] Insects and other invertebrates


[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Smith (February 7, 2004)
  2. ^ Bagemihl (1999)
  3. ^ a b c News-medical.net (2006)
  4. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 213
  5. ^ Bagemihl (1999)
  6. ^ Harrold (1999)
  7. ^ Solimeo (2004)
  8. ^ Solimeo (2004b)
  9. ^ Bagemihl (1999) pages 122-166
  10. ^ Roughgarden (2004) pp.13-183
  11. ^ Vasey (1995) pages 173-204
  12. ^ Sommer & Vasey (2006)
  13. ^ LeVay, (19 September 2007)
  14. ^ Dunkle (1991)
  15. ^ Utzeri (1990)
  16. ^ a b Bagemihl (1999), page 665
  17. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 37
  18. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 658, 664
  19. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 658, 664
  20. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 665
  21. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  22. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  23. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 664
  24. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 665
  25. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 658, 665
  26. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  27. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 658, 664
  28. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 232, 233, 244
  29. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  30. ^ a b Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  31. ^ a b c d e Bagemihl (1999), page 657
  32. ^ a b Bagemihl (1999), pages 657, 658
  33. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Bagemihl (1999), page 657, 658
  34. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 243, 664
  35. ^ a b c Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  36. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  37. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 232, 664
  38. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 658, 664
  39. ^ a b Bagemihl (1999), pages 663–664
  40. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  41. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  42. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 657
  43. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  44. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 658
  45. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 657
  46. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 668, 667
  47. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 666
  48. ^ a b c Bagemihl (1999), page 666
  49. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 666
  50. ^ Tatarnic1 et al, 22 March 2006
  51. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 660
  52. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 667
  53. ^ Zimmer (2000)
  54. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 667
  55. ^ a b Bagemihl (1999) page 657
  56. ^ a b c Bagemihl (1999) pages 704, 713
  57. ^ a b c d e Bagemihl (1999) pages 150, 232, 236, 246
  58. ^ a b c Bagemihl (1999) pages 33–34, 196, 217, 219, 232
  59. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 668
  60. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 666
  61. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 595
  62. ^ a b Bagemihl (1999) pages 9, 649, 665
  63. ^ a b Bagemihl (1999) page 666
  64. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 658
  65. ^ a b Bagemihl (1999) page 3
  66. ^ a b c d Bagemihl (1999) page 232
  67. ^ Bagemihl (1999) pages 666, 660
  68. ^ a b c Bagemihl (1999) pages 236, 704, 713
  69. ^ Bagemihl (1999) pages 666, 660
  70. ^ Bagemihl (1999) pages 661–2
  71. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 661
  72. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 660
  73. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 660
  74. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Bagemihl (1999), pages 661–2
  75. ^ Bagemihl (1999) page 660
  76. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 660
  77. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 659
  78. ^ Bagemihl (1999), pages 109, 469
  79. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 660
  80. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 660
  81. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 661
  82. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 660
  83. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 660
  84. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 660
  85. ^ Bagemihl (1999), page 660

[edit] Bibliography