User talk:LindsayH

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Richard Fitz Gilbert

I am replying to your question, as to his date of birth. How certin can one be about someone that lived over 500 years ago, the changes made were done according to the information contained in The Royal Ancestry Bible Royal ancestors of 300 Ameircan Families By Michel L. Call ISBN 1-933194-22-7 (chart 1696). Thanks Dthem 2000 13:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Moved from Userpage Lindsay 17:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] username

Funny coincidence! But yes, it's mostly a local thing. You wouldn't have heard of it unless you'd lived in the area. VanTucky Talk 19:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Perpetual virginity of Mary

Yes, good edits imo - the line that "It is also considered unfit for Christ to have had siblings." only arrived a few days ago, and I only tagged it for 'citation needed' as I thought it an interesting comment that might be sourced somewhere - but nothign has turned up. Springnuts (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

"Removing warnings from your talk page is often considered vandalism." I didn't know that. Thanks. 70.101.182.149 (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Testing maybe..:)

He is an animal..:) Igor Berger (talk) 22:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Hello LindsayH.
I noticed that you revert vandalism. Thank you for helping keep Wikipedia the best encyclopedia in the world!
However, I have noticed that you do not always leave warnings on the users talk pages. You should always leave an appropriate warning after reverting vandalism. (The full list of talk page warnings may be found here, along with some suggestions and guidelines for using them.)
Be sure to leave the correct level of warning, and if the user has been warned four times in the last month, (Check the users talk page history. Some users remove warnings from their talk pages.) report by going to this page and following the instructions.
Thank you again, and may vandalism fail. Ultra! 19:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)Ultra! 19:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

You are quite correct. I do not leave a warning when it is not clearly vandalism, or when it may be a questionable edit by an anon IP. Some editors feel there is no point warning IPs; i don't agree, but i do see the point, and therefore believe that letting a warning go is preferable to putting one every time and either driving off someone trying to help, or wasting a warning where one isn't needed. Thanks for your help & suggestions. Cheers, Lindsay 19:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] please look into

please look into your reporting before doing so, if you looked at the history i was the one that created the page and then deleted it, and i am now aware on how to actually move the page the correct way (currently in process) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.14.166.139 (talk) 23:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Blanking a page with no Edit Summary is liable to be called vandalism with no second look. You ought to have made a speedy delete request. Cheers, Lindsay 14:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My change

I just dont like the Rangers so i put that in there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.187.3 (talk) 21:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mohammed Ayoob

I have removed the reference to Dalit Advisai descent which is false. In fact, it is vandalism bordering on libel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.20.144.7 (talk) 00:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Straw poll

HI Linday I noticed you reverted me. Badgering aside, the idea of the project proposed is not to create a gazillion sub stubs. Part of it is to set up a coordinated project revolving around FritzBot to clean up all existing settlement articles by country before new content is generated. So the title of the oppostion isn't an accurate statement. Really it should be just for those who oppose the whole idea not just genrating new content as that was what the old proposal was about ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 12:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Mmm I see what you are saying. but there is more to the idea than what it implies thats all. As I said, it should just be oppostion to bots generating or editing existing articles in general not just creating them en masse. Anyway, on a different note I created the article on Ar Rifa` earlier which the bot would have started from the missing list. There are many thousands of places with a population around 100,000 missing from wikipedia thats all. But I respect your view and have tried not to "badger" people this time. I only seemed to hassle people before because they had misinterpreted the proposal. Regards ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 12:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)