Talk:Linfield F.C.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linfield F.C. is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Contents

[edit] Successfulness

If you do a simple search on Glasgow Rangers FC, we are told that they are the world's most successful football club, and that they are the first club to reach the milestone of 200 trophies. I would in fact, beg to differ. Linfield FC are the first club to break both barries, and as such are the world's most successful rather than Rangers. Regardless of the trophies won, or the league both teams play in - Linfield are more successful. You could argue if you take the approach of standard, that rangers are certain at least a trophy a season, as it always has been with either Celtic or themselves dominating. Also, if Linfield's trophy haul is overlooked in this matter, then why does it mention us as tie holders in the "domestic double" record with (as it happens) Rangers? Davie74 17:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Rangers are the worlds most successful football club. They have won over 270 trophies in all competitions. check out the honours page here rangershistory.co.uk Robrangershistory 12:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

linfield are infact the most sucessful team in the world with 210 FIFA recognized trophies rangers have approx. 198 would you like to add the other trophies that rangers have won and how many times they've won it, also why has no-on else stated this point. IT'S OBVIOUSLY A LIE!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.188.175 (talk) 12:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Organisation

Can I suggest tha the article be re-organised a little bit?

How about a history section, fully detailing Linfield's past and incorporating the euro games as a subsection. Then have another section on Linfield's more rectn fortunes?

Jdorney 09:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

I see this had been done already, but someone had vandalised it.


I think the main Linfield article needs to be shortened down somewhat with most of the information befeed out to other Linfield FC pages. ifcp1 09:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jackie Milburn

There's some information missing on the Jackie Milburn page, in particular how many games he played for Linfield and the exact number of goals he scored. If anyone has the info to hand it'd be great if you could add it. Thanks --Daduzi talk 03:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Linfield

Be fair! If you're going to record an attack on Linfield supporters by Nationalists, you should also mention the strong anti-Catholic element associated with Linfield - can't have one without the other! Better still, simply remove the comment, because it has nothing to do with football.


i have redone the sectarianism section to include a more modern true blues section, that will hopefully be more palletable to onlookers --Ifcp1 03:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

As you should know there was no such "no catholics" policy. I have removed the section and urge you not to re-enter the libelious statements. --1886 LFC

[edit] Biggest club in Ireland?

Is the statement that Linfield are Ireland's biggest supported club not a tad subjective? Is there imperical evidence to suggest this?

I think they work out as the biggest on numbers through the turnstyles, The data for RoI is here [[1]], but unfortunetly the irish FA dont publish their stats. I would guess on that basis, it fails WP:VERIFY criteria for inclusion! 86.12.249.63 21:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm Irish living in the US and it seems that all the Irish over here are celtic fans. Estimate that a larger percentage of fans in Ireland would support an non-Irish team like Celtic or Man Utd.


Hello unnamed user

I'm looking to reword that section so as its not upseting to some people, because its been vandalised alot.--Ifcp1 03:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

- Cheers. I don't think anyone can dispute they are one of the biggest clubs but Derry, Cork, Shamrock Rovers and Bohemian FC may all throw in various claims to that title in one was or another.

[edit] Auto peer review suggestions

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question.

  • The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
  • Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
  • Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.[1]
  • Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.[2]
  • Per WP:MOS#Headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References” or “Footnotes”, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[3]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a. [4]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Mal 06:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Delisted GA

If this ever was a good article, it certainly is no more. A very quick glance reveals that it fails at least the following WP:WIAGA criteria:

  • 1b - inferior lead section, list incorporation
  • 2a,b - not referenced properly, no citation tags
  • 3 - especially note the imbalance between "2005-06" section and history section (see WP:RECENT)
  • 6 - image has no fair use rationale

Punkmorten 20:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Capacity

My understanding was the capacity for Internationals were different from those of domestic games, due to the use of the Railway stand, I've tagged this for citation The Fashion Icon 11:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Linfieldfc.gif

Image:Linfieldfc.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

[edit] Only team never to lose an F A cup tie

It is stated in the article that Linfield are the only club never to have lost an F A cup tie. This is not the case as several clubs in the early days of the competition won or drew in ties and then withdrew from the competition without playing again thus never losing a tie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.113.48.9 (talk) 11:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

BetacommandBot 21:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Clean sweep"

A clean sweep would mean winning everything on offer. Linfield never won any European competition they entered. Domestically, maybe, but they haven't won a true clean sweep. Just a thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.107.222 (talk) 20:31, 12 June 2008 (UTC)