Talk:Line clipping
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Where is a reference for the efficiency of Liang-Barsky, I was under the impression that it was considerably *less* efficient to do the full problem (should be obvious considering it's a generalisation of the problem to arbitrary clipping regions).
[edit] Code credit?
The pseudocode appears to come from http://www-static.cc.gatech.edu/grads/h/Hao-wei.Hsieh/Haowei.Hsieh/code1.html. I believe they should receive credit on the page. Is there any consensus on this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.237.230.9 (talk) 12:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Algorithm explanations
I think the code should be acompanied by an explanations of the algo. Only code doesn't make too much sense. weedrat 11:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Why the hell did the writer choose C sharp anyway? C/C++ is more commonly used and isn't Microsoft-exclusive. 69.124.106.162 04:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- C# gives more clean understanding of algorithm than pseudocode
- It can be easily converted to C++ or Java or something else ( by hands or via AST transformation )
- It's not MS-exclusive, see www.mono-project.com. Jack 04:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
If it can be so easily converted, convert it into a more commonly used language. 74.196.222.79 (talk) 10:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merge/ split
I think the introduction of this article must be either deleted or merged with the mentioned page. Each clipping algorithm should be given a separate page. --Weedrat 08:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
I agree. Lakeworks (talk) 13:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Created new articles for Cohen-Sutherland and Liang-Barsky, but failed to remove the content from this page, due to a bot reverting it. Lakeworks (talk) 13:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)