Talk:Linda Strawberry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Linda Strawberry article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.

[edit] Last Name

Her last name really is Rowberry. See this review of the last Smashing Pumpkins concert. Jesseoneill 18:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

With confirmation that Rowberry really is her last name, I set up Linda Rowberry to redirect to this article. It might be better to have the redirect go the other way.Jesseoneill 20:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Age

She is 26 years old. She was born on September 9, 1981. See Linda Strawberry.--EditorMonk 14:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Topless photo

Presenting the history of her online activites, including her topless photo incident is not "vandalism" to the article, it is history. Stop trying to classify it as such, please.

Please read the policy about the biographies of living people. Negative information from non-reliable sources, like forums, will be immediately removed. Shell ^babelfish 08:56, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Negative information alone about someone is not reason to remove it. In this case it is not unreliable sources as the incident in question can be verified with the owner of the forums.

And I quote "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." This can be found if you bother to go to non-reliable sources as mentioned above. A forum does not represent a "published [source] with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" in the slightest sense. --EditorMonk 14:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)