User talk:Likwidshoe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Maybe it wasn't you but the comment you inserted along with your edit made me suspect you. Either way sorry, but just for reference, if you had read on you would see it has never been brought up for a vote. I thought your edit was fine and actually better than what was previously there, I just suspected you of changing it for political reasons because of the comment you left. Maybe I'm just too sleep deprived. Peace? -too lazy and don't care enough to get an actual wikiaccount. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.51.71 (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spelling
→Types of ravers - reverted back to the DICTIONARY spelling
Sorry, did not meant ot cause offence but it is listed as jewellery in Wikipedia but then says jewelery is the American spelling. I just spell checked the whole document (as I noticed a few other mistakes) and it changed them all to English spellings. Rex the first 01:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] "Civility"
This [1] is unacceptable as an edit comment: see WP:CIVIL William M. Connolley 11:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I don't play by your double standards. Likwidshoe 11:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hypnosadist's paranoid fantasy [2] is also unacceptable. Please take a little while to think William M. Connolley 16:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- I find your message unacceptable. Now what? Once again Connolley - I don't play by your double standards. When you apply the same standards to those who agree with you, I'll be able to take you seriously. Until then, I can see that you're just blowing smoke. Now it's time for you to take a little while to think about what I've just said. Likwidshoe 18:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- By the way - thanks for the block. Your little power trip shows me that you can't handle disagreement. I notice that you do no such blocks with people who show far more incivility, but agree with you. Hell, you don't even warn them on their pages as you did mine. Why not Connolley? Care to answer this slam-dunk case of your hypocrisy?
- This "encyclopedia" is a joke with admins who abuse such power so cavalierly. Likwidshoe 18:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hypnosadist's paranoid fantasy [2] is also unacceptable. Please take a little while to think William M. Connolley 16:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Now what? You can have a bit longer to think about why repeating the same incivility was a bad idea William M. Connolley 21:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Good grief. You're acting like a petulant child. Your insistence of whitewashing [3] things that you disagree with only make some of my previous points. The record is there and you can't run away from it. "Now what" indeed.
- Enjoy your powertrip. Your blocks aren't any kind of punishment. It's actually kind of funny that you take offense so easily while at the same time excusing your own incivility. Hypocrisy, thy name is Connolley. Likwidshoe 23:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
