Talk:Life Is Not a Fairy Tale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Last editor- the reason I changed your page is that most of it is copied directly, word for word, from your sources. This is a violation of copyright. I'm returning it to the changes I made; if I've made errors in information or in style, feel free to correct them.FisherQueen 02:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Last editor- the version you reverted to is copied from another source. This is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Please, before you revert again, discuss it here. If you don't like the way I've rewritten it, or if I've left out important information, please make the changes you think are necessary. If you think I'm wrong about this page being a violation of copyright, please discuss it here. But please don't just revert again, as I will tag it as a copyright violation and request that it be deleted.FisherQueen 23:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Included factual information in my revision to better decribe both the movie and book.-70.197.232.79

You've re-added significant portions of what you call 'actual descriptions' in your edit description- information copied from other web sites. I'm sorry that you didn't understand my notes above; I really have been trying to help you develop a good Wikipedia page for this book and movie. Please, show the article, your sources, and this talk page to your favorite English teacher, and ask her to show you why I keep reverting your article.

Until then, I've posted this article in the copyright violations section. It could be deleted completely, but I'd rather we found a way to make it work, because I agree with you that the book is notable enough to deserve a good article here.FisherQueen 12:53, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

FisherQueen- The information that I added was from reading the book and watching the movie. It is NOT copyrighted. I have not added anything that was posted before. Those chapters are actual chapters in the BOOK. Your condescending tone of your last post is not appreciated. You were also the first one to say do not change the page unless it is discussed here, yet you erased my work and tagged it without discussing it here. What you edited described nothing about neither things, there were also misspellings littered throughout. That led me to believe you knew nothing about the book or the movie, so I edited it to better describe those things and that came came from MY head, not another website. Nothing is a copyrighted violation the only thing I left there was the Yahoo press release that I CITED at the bottom. I also hope you save your rude remarks the next time you post to me because I happen to think "My English Teacher" did just fine. -70.197.232.79

Edited to add- I added more information on the book and did so without getting too deep into each situation. If there needs to be a change then do so, but once again it is NOT copyrighted info.

[edit] Some Non-NPOV stuff

The whole book description includes pretty much nothing but opinions. Could someone rewrite this? 65.12.134.148 22:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. This reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article 80.192.40.63 (talk) 18:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)