User talk:Lid/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for your advice. :) Seraphimblade 05:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Just to let you know...

I just expanded CSD A7 to cover unremarkable web content an hour ago. :) MER-C 13:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] K3m1xx (talk • contribs • block log)

Just a query as to why you blocked for only 31 hours? I thought it was your everyday one off vandal but the usage of hangon and the talk page at least implies a sockpuppet. –– Lid(Talk) 23:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

I was tempted to indef-block but I thought that they could have a second chance. Maybe I should go with my gut instinct. If they do return to vandalise at that account again, an indef block would be in order as a vandalism-only account. (aeropagitica) 00:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mike the rocker

Thanks, i've deleted it again. Can you warn this guy with {{nn-warn}} or whatever the template is for vanity articles though? Thanks. --W.marsh 02:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, the guy looks to just be recreating the page and doesn't seem to realize why it's getting deleted. --W.marsh 02:48, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Decline Vic Grimes + others

You declined my sprotect request on that "the vandal has been blocked" but the vandal is using AOL IPs that change depending on the pages, and those definately were not blocked as they returned a few hours later. –– Lid(Talk) 04:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't realize that. It's been semi-protected now. — Mets501  (talk)  10:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Watchmen

I noticed that you expanded the Watchmen subsection at the article development hell based on the "Project history" section I added to the film article at the time (that was a heck of a project, I tell ya). Just wanted to say that I noticed the expansion and was pleased to see a well-done job of it! Keep up the good work. --Erik (talk/contrib) @ 03:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Featured picture promotion!
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Riffle shuffle.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. howcheng {chat} 18:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
This is to let you know the Featured Picture you uploaded and/or nominated Image:Riffle shuffle.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the day on January 10, 2007, when it will be featured on the Main Page. Congratulations! howcheng {chat} 17:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Agreed...

Yes I saw the Medcab "case" also. I more wantede an "official" reply from Gingko before investigating any further. However I fear that this may well be a people in glass houses... scenario and our friend may end up with the shortest straw. Thanks for your input, appreciated :) Glen 13:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

I read your comments at WP:ANI. I only found out about this discussion (ANI is not currently on my watchlist) while investigating after a comment left on my talk. I meant no intimidation and I did not know the user in question was using his/her real name. (Actually I defended the user against the vandalism accusation at Talk:Schizophrenia. Thank you for doing some investigating to show I did not make false claims. --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 14:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pro wrestling article assessing now in place

In case you didn't know: Category:Unassessed Professional wrestling articles. Everyone needs to help out and assess, the idea was a good one... but I hope it doesn't end up like other projects: many pages of unassessed articles due to people not wanting to assess articles. I've started assessing, but there is much work to be done. RobJ1981 01:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CM Punk

Lid, I have houseguests, will look as soon as I can. I'm not sure about a DVD as a reliable source, need to spend some time investigating ... Sandy 15:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removing semi-protection

Hi. I've removed the semi-protection on your talk page. I know that vandalism of talk pages can be a problem, but it's important that users be able to be contacted by newbies with questions and concerns about things they don't understand. I hope you understand - please feel free to contact me with any questions. Phil Sandifer 19:16, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your suggestion

Sure - I'm not sure it needs an image at all, but suggest it on the relevant talk page. ed g2s • talk 13:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hee hee!

Oh, but sometimes they're fun. Before I was an admin (which I've been for not even two weeks), I would occasionally tag articles that said "Joe is teh smartest 14 yr old evarrr" with {{disputed}} or the like along with my db tag. Anything to keep you sane. Keep up the good work! -- Merope 15:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hero

Skayde is the same as Jorge Rivera who is already listed there, so I just put it back in quotes. Jonathan Burgess 16:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Clarification on proposed merge

How is the page Oh we're from dear old Wesleyan different from Far Above Cayuga's Waters? WikiprojectOWU 18:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Expected

I sort of expected this response in reference to the Cornell alma mater song. But what about Old Hokie, Brewer Fever, Fight On, Fight Raiders, Fight, Hail Purdue! about 30 more fight songs on Wikipedia? None of them will pass your notability test. WikiprojectOWU 07:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

It makes more sense this way. WikiprojectOWU 07:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] wtf

wt did i do vandalize pages i been tryin to help out krakcrook 05:15, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Joy of Satan article

Might be legit (sadly), but the reason I deleted the first version was because it was pure link spam. The second version was sheer nonsense via a sockpuppet. Wound up blocking both accounts for disrution and vandalism because of it. If someone's willing to take a whack at a legit article, I'll unblock it. Thanks for the update.  :) - Lucky 6.9 02:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Thanks for fixing my archive page!  :))

Lucky 6.9 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

[edit] Re:Image:Washington Monument Dusk Jan 2006.jpg

Hi Lid,
If you look at the history you'll see it's had 6 deleted edits. When I did the promoting I closed it correctly. If you are not an admin you probably can't see, but in the history I think this is where the problem is "Deletion log,

   * 15:02, October 9, 2006 David Levy (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Image:Washington Monument Dusk Jan 2006.jpg" (no longer on the main page)

" --Fir0002 21:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Guillotinechoke.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Guillotinechoke.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Third Opinion

It appears that admin Centrx has been going on a crusade though the Wrestling articles. Using notability as a cause for deletion. I think this borderline WP:Point as he has tried to push notability guideline before. Currently we are discussing things here DVDVR which is up for deletion once more. If you look in Centrx's edit history you will see several Wrestling articles that are put up for deletion due to notability. I just think he is really pushing the issue and woould like your opinion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NegroSuave (talk • contribs) 15:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Claire Bennet's healing ability

Hi. I reverted your change to Claire's abilities in List of characters in Heroes, since Zach referred to her healing ability as "spontaneous regeneration" after reading Chandra's book, and using the show's terminology is more appropriate than using comic book terminology. In your edit summary, you wrote "it isn't spontaneous." I'm not sure why you think that. It appears to me that Claire spontaneously heals after injury rather than her making a conscious effort to heal. Primogen 06:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

I believe you are confusing the word "spontaneous" (definition: "arising from internal forces or causes; independent of external agencies; self-acting.") with "unconditional" or "unpreventable". That a foreign object can impede her healing ability or that her tissue can't be too far separated for the healing process to take place, does not mean that it is not spontaneous. Primogen 18:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Differences between the W.I.T.C.H. comic and animated series. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Evil oranges 18:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Reason why BooyakaDell is going through WP:AN

The Checkuser confirmed that BooyakaDell, the IP address and a third account are all combined. They could not do a CheckUser of JB196 because he edited so long ago that the IP addresses were no longer available. So it's not QUITE confirmed (although we all know it is), and Durova is just making sure all the ducks are in a row that won't give JB/Booyaka a chance to wriggle out of it later. Thanks for your help, btw SirFozzie 01:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Could you give me specific diffs for the move lists that JB196 and BooyakaDell tried to edit into Wikipedia's articles, along with a link to the relevant pages on the other website? Basically the only argument Booyaka has going for him is that he's gotten his information from that site. If the information isn't there and the edits are the same then he's nailed. Reply to WP:AN or my user talk page please. DurovaCharge! 04:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Claude

Fine. Whatever. The section needed work anyway; I simply wasn't in the mood. Still, you just tacked on your addition with no apparent attempt maintaining a flow. I've copyeditted the section, but in general I prefer to enforce a little idear I call "WIR" (write it right). Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 20:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The latest rash of JB socks

Yeah, file a RFCU for him. I tagged a few of the AfD's with the fact that if the user who created them is a SOCK, then they will be speedy deleted (db-ban), and the articles kept. SirFozzie 20:06, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nigel McGuinness

Just as an fyi, I am trying to reopen this issue with Nigel McGuinness' real name being taken off wikipedia. It smacks of censorship to me Thedukeofno

[edit] Re: Not all done, shockingly

Thanks for the help! :) That should be pretty close to all of them. I checked the user creation logs for everything you gave me, and everything jpgordon listed, and I think for everything I blocked. May have missed a few, but let me know if anything more crops up (or sumbit another RfCU, if needed). Cheers! Luna Santin 07:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I'll see if I can inquire about it off-wiki; in the meantime, you're free to make the same request at the case page. :) Luna Santin 08:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Claudio.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Claudio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Miamivince63 (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) sock account of JB196 (talk • contribs • block log) established by checkuser, needs indef blocking. –– Lid(Talk) 06:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Can I get a link to that checkuser report? ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 07:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Ok, indefblocked. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 07:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Could you help me out again?

Whew. Took me a bit, but everything listed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Damastakilla is now blocked and tagged. Luna Santin 09:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Verdict socks

I take it your still noticing the ever increasing number of Vandal/Martin181 sockpuppets... i have really tried my best to make him understand the problems with his edits esspecially the Brock Lesnar article but its like talking to a brick wall -- Paulley

[edit] Why did you remove the "Bonded by Blood (disambiguation)"?

I wasn't even finished before you jumped in (only had the new page up for 10mins). The term is not just used for a music album. There is also an advertising campaign being run by the New Zealand team All Blacks, whose website is ranked number one in search results on google for the term "Bonded by Blood" with the guild I had cited with same name, own website taking 3rd palace. --- Raogrimm2

WP:WEB and WP:Notability mean that online guilds or clans do not receive wikipedia articles, evn ones that are arguably notable such as myg0t. –– Lid(Talk) 11:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Did not answer my question?

What about the advertising campaign? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Raogrimm2 (talk • contribs) 11:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC). --- Raogrimm2

The advertising campaign may belong on the page for the All-Blacks but the campaign itself does not require its own article. –– Lid(Talk) 11:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] But what if its become a cultural phenomena?

You forget that an advertising campaign can become a cultural phenomena and deserves a spot on wikipedia such as the "I am Canadian" campaign which also has an article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_Canadian --- Raogrimm2

[edit] Even though the phenomena is debateable in your 'opinion', the posters them selves deserve an article.

Okay while I still believe that the campagin can be considered a Social Phenomena on a community level (fans). As physical item, the posters them selves deserve an article, just as much that many postage stamps recieve their own articles. For example, the boat the Bluenose must have a disambiguatiion on its article for the postage stamp. --- Raogrimm2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluenose_%28disambiguation%29 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Raogrimm2 (talk • contribs) 11:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Verdict

What is your problem i am not Verdict man damnit! I am not Verdict! I am not Daniel either! You have no solid proof and i give you my damn word that i am not! I cant do anything else but to tell you i am not Verdict!!!!!!!!!!!!

The above statement was proven to be a lie. --Yamla 14:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

Thank you for your message - it is indeed satisfying. I don't mind telling you that I think the usual bias against pro-wrestling is getting in the way during FACs. I had to deal with one particular objection that had nothing to do with the article. On pure numbers, it was a narrow margin but happily Raul examined the article for himself. Cheers - if I can be of assistance in any future pro-wrestling FACs, lemme know. Rama's arrow 14:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Ha! No bloody wonder - you ran into the toughest copyediting hounds - Sandy and Tony! My frank opinion is that a couple of hours of copyediting work should be enough for the second try to succeed. If you will allow me, I think the article will be ready for a second FAC by Monday latest. Rama's arrow 14:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
True - one of the factors in Montreal screwjob was its book references. It will be a challenge to find any books talking about CM Punk just yet (as he is a young wrestler). Don't worry, I'm sure we can satisfy WP:RS. Rama's arrow 14:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, that is a tough debate. My response to such an argument is that it is not your (or anybody else's) fault that there aren't enough sources on the topic. We are also a volunteer army, not paid researchers that we need to dig to the centre of the earth looking for "reliable" references. PWT, Wrestling Observer, etc. must be recognized as RS becoz they are the only real literature on the subject. For a bunch of my FAs, I had to scour and dig through obscure research papers on Google Scholar - a lot of painstaking, "volunteer" work. And articles like CM Punk make Wikipedia unique - Britannica wouldn't have information on virtually anything on pro-wrestling. It is important for WP to rise to the occasion. Rama's arrow 15:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Electric chair facebuster

I didn't even notice the bomb one. That's definitely incorrectly named, so let's redirect. ↪Lakes (Talk) 12:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oaksta

Great ... I have a doppelgänger now. :) --  oakster  TALK  17:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of The Wire episodes

Hi again Lid. Noting that you edited List of The Wire episodes within the last few months I wonder if you have an opinion about the use of screenshots in this article and would welcome your opinion here if you have time.--Opark 77 22:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An edit you made

On my Brimstone (wrestler) article you made several edits, one in which you said "quotes should be on wikiquote". I'm not sure as to what is meant by that, as I am still a newcomer to wiki. Also, you changed the finishing move XiBalba to a Goriconoclasm(sp?), I did look at that link, and the move is similar, but that is not the move, because he does a sit-out into a pin during the move. Due to media exposure, I believe the XiBalba was originated by him. BTW- thanks for the clean-up! —YeLLeY511 21:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

You have reverted my revert on the finisher, to now read as a "cross-arm iconoclasm", which is still not correct, as he sits-out with it into a seated pin, which is a move he created. I'll leave it the way it is for now, but hope to find a better way to classify it, since it is its own move.—YeLLeY511 03:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please cite sources

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Bryan Danielson, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure what you are asking me to cite: every single line of his career? When he used X move to win X match? I understand your concerns for original research, however, professional wrestler related articles have had discussion on this subject long and hard as most of the sources are the primary sources of the shows in which they occur. –– Lid(Talk) 02:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Lid, thanks for getting back to me. To answer your question, all material on Wikipedia needs to be attributable to a reliable, published source. As of right now the stub version is semi-sourced, but I'm still not entirely sure that what we have now qualifies as a reliable publication per se. If you would like to comment, there is a WP:AN thread regarding this and similar articles. Take care, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Autoblocked

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 220.237.125.16 lifted or expired.

Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  06:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nigel McGuinness

Admin FCYTravis ruled back in September that his real name is not to be posted. Nenog 01:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jack Evans

They came from this: http://youtube.com/watch?v=XoRnfWOSTTg. I tried to make a source but couldn't find the air date. The programs website doesn't go back much. I guess someone could contact them and ask for the info. ↪Lakes (Talk) 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cm_punk.jpg

I saw you deleted this image due to the actions of Atticus SVU however there was a free use image before Atticus uploaded his version over the top of this one that is now gone too. Could you undo the deletion of this image so I can rollback to before Atticus' additions to the old free use image? –– Lid(Talk) 16:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

The only other version was uploaded by Mikedk9109. --Yamla 16:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry but I also need to note your block of User:Mikedk9109, you blocked him based off a Randy Orton image from photobucket. Photobucket is a website in which anyone can upload images to, similar to imageshack, thus the copyright listing seems odd as the image could've been uploaded by anyone. –– Lid(Talk) 16:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

This was not the only reason for the block. This user has a history of image problems and has been blocked for these in the past. Given that we found this image elsewhere with a copyright notice attached and given that many of his images are quite dubious, I felt it reasonable to block him and to mark the images as missing a full source allowing us to verify the status. --Yamla 16:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
(By the way, I'm not trying to give you a circumspect answer or anything, if what I've written here doesn't fully answer your questions, please let me know) --Yamla 16:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

You said: "The image problems he was blocked for, which you blocked him for in fact, show that he was blocked for REMOVING tags from wrestling articles. I'm guessing that that was during the period where there was a crackdown on fair use images with no fair use rationales that resulted in others deleting the fair use deletion notices. The "elsewhere" was on a website where anyone can upload images too, thus it can be deducted as that the image could be on a free licence elsewhere and taken from there, or that the image is all over the internet and thus is featured on copyrighted websites and free use websites. The fact photobucket is the source here is an issue to me as anyone can upload images to photobucket."

A copyright violation has most certainly occurred. Given the number of similar pictures on the photobucket source, all containing the same girl, it seems reasonable to believe that it was Mikedk9109 who committed the violation. Do you have any specific reason to believe otherwise? --Yamla 17:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

You said: "Just note that you deleted the Samoa Joe image Image:Samoa Joe.jpg which I have tracked down was from flickr under a shared licence. Could that image be re-added?"

No. That image is available under the CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license. Both the non-commercial and the no-derivative-works parts conflict with Wikipedia requirements. --Yamla 15:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] In reference to new page: Kenneth Jenkins

I am wondering what needs to be done with this page in order for you not to remove it. He is verifiable and so are about 10-12 other wrestlers wrestling in this gulf florida promotion.


Please don't remove it. Please. Kj102586 17:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The dreamer and the sleeper - AfD?

I'd vote to delete right now. The article is one of the best-looking local band articles I've seen, but they still aren't notable. Nominate it. Realkyhick 08:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Whobettathan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whobettathan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 21:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Homicide never wrestled in NWA East, PWX, or PWL.

THE MAN WHO WON THOSE BELTS WAS A DIFFERENT "HOMICIDE" LONG BEFORE.

Your info is wrong, Buddy. I suggest you get it right or I will notify.

[edit] User page

I removed an edit from your user page, it looks like a comment intended for here.--Alf melmac 08:38, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nigel McGuinness

I am curious, why is everybody getting a fuss up about his real name? Kris 23:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Checkuser case completed

Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 20:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Burntsauce

I'm amazed he/she has left your comment on for longer than two minutes. Although whatever is posted (and at least ten different editors have said the same thing) he/she always deletes the message. If you want I have a wall you can bang your head up against, it is probably about as constructive. Darrenhusted 22:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Need your assistance (involves Burntsauce)

Hey bro, I see you too dislike what Burntsauce has been doing.

Over at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Burntsauce we are talking about him, and I would really appreciate your involvment. Some of the things they are asking of me I do not fully understand, and seeing that you are an experienced Wikipedian, hopefully you can help us stop Burntsauce.

Thanks, Kris 02:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning: Repeated violation of WP:A policy

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Li Yuqin, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Burntsauce 20:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Checkuser case completed

Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 14:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Adrian Adonis

I think you are mistaken in this case. The article needs sources. Period. --Jimbo Wales 01:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Image:Wide Right.gif

I restored it. John Reaves (talk) 01:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Guillotine choke

Regarding the image in guillotine choke, the choke is normally completed in the full guard on the ground for leverage, yes, but given the right opportunity it can be finished standing up too, eg. Crocop vs Randleman 2. Reference How about we mention that in the article? Shawnc 03:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Checkuser case completed

Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 08:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Reply

That would have been a lot more useful edit summary than "Undid revision 132651061 by 194.150.121.42 (talk)". -- John Reaves (talk) 12:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image: Michaels-sweetchinmusic.jpg

Can you revert that to the original image. Cause the individual who "cropped" it made it look horrible!!! Also that image is under the "Creative Commons" license. And, I don't know if your suppose the edit them!!! Thanks. ThinkBlue 18:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know!!!! I thought it was only images that are released under the "PD-self" license!!!! Thanks anyway, at least I talked to someone!!! ThinkBlue 18:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Depoli / page move vandal

I moved Michael "Roadkill" Depoli back to Michael Depoli. I think I've now correctly fixed the page move vandals moves, but could you just quickly double check for me. I've been an admin since the dawn of time but I haven't done alot of these fixes. Thanks. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I'll reduce the block to one week. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Heroes_Sylar2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Heroes_Sylar2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 14:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MVP

The information we have shows his name to be Alvin Burke, with Asaad as an alias. Until someone can show that he had a name change that should be the article title.«»bd(talk stalk) 14:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Until the Wresting Observer stats citeing sources themselves it can't be looked at as anything other than a rumour site. It still gets things wrong on a semi-regular basis, doesn't bother to correct itself, and thus falls under the category of "questionable sources".«»bd(talk stalk) 18:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

I've just reverted vandalism on your userpage for you by User:Ferocious Driver. I hope you don't mind! Stwalkerster talk review 13:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your GA nomination of Nora Greenwald

The article Nora Greenwald you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Nora Greenwald for eventual comments about the article. Well done!

• The Giant Puffin • 20:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)