Talk:Libertarianz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Political parties, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of political parties-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to "featured" and "good article" standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details. [View this template] |
| Portal | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
Libertarianz is part of WikiProject New Zealand, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
I have been trying to find out if Ian Fraser the founder of Libertarianz is the same person as Ian Fraser the broadcaster. My reason for wondering this is that Libertarianz leader Lindsay Perigo is also a broadcaster, and this would naturally link the two men—Copey
No no no! Completely different people, I can assure you. Ppe42 14:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Party press release re Darton v Clark
I removed the party press release and replaced it with something from a more neutral POV. Feel free to add more links, but please don't copy party press realeases into wikipedia. I am aware that you may think it is all true, but it is hardly from a neutral point of view. Neil Leslie 10:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image removal
User:Robz0r removed the two images at the bottom of the article with the comment "Images - remove propaganda"
I reverted this change because there was an insufficient explanation of why the images (or the captions of the images) represent propaganda. I am not sure how a picture of a political protest or billboard could itself be propaganda (although it could certainly portray propaganda). The pictures are of actual events, with actual Libertarianz members, and IMHO the captions simply describe the facts behind the events (one protest of Parliament and one placing of an election billboard).
(Perhaps this was an instance of wiki-envy, since the entries of other NZ political parties do not have such attractive, illustrative public domain pictures of party protests, billboards or other events) :-)
Ppe42 11:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bernard-video.jpg
Image:Bernard-video.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
