User talk:LexiLynn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome!

Hello LexiLynn! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some pages to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kamope · talk · contributions 12:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

[edit] Stephanie Adams

Good call! I've compiled my own list of IP addresses (http://www.richardsramblings.com/?p=556), but due to my non-neutrality I hesitate making any official notifications about her sock puppets myself. Don't forget to add SEKHMET7 and Cle0patr4 to the aliases of Ladysekhmet... -- Richard D. LeCour ^{(talk/contribs)} 05:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Troll is back

Thank you for bringing that to my attention. I've alerted some other admins of the situation, and if problems should persist with this user after the one-week block, the user will likely be recommended for a community ban. I will try to keep an eye on this user in the meantime. —Pilotguy push to talk 22:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jessica Lunsford

Look child, you do not know what you are talking about. You do not know a thing about me, so quit trying to act like you know what my motives are. I do not care in the least if you decide to follow my edits. I edit and follow all sorts of articles, not just articles on crime. I do not have to justify myself to the likes of you. I've been here way longer then you have and I'm fully aware of what wikipedia is about. Your comments were rude and very sanctimonious, because my edit was not vandalism. Vandalism around here is anything that disrupts an article out of simple malice. I don't see how calling her kidnapped is not neutral. It is not saying who kidnapped her, or acting as if that person is convicted. She was taken from her home and a massive search for her followed. Anyhow, it is water under the bridge now. I will leave it at that, because consensus, from the wikipedia community, says the word "allege" has to be used. Goodbye and do not reply, because I'm not going to read another message from you. Fighting for Justice 05:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Assume good faith

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Fighting for Justice. Thank you. Leebo⁸⁶ 05:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Don't replace messages removed by a user on their talk page

What a user chooses to keep or remove from their talk page is left to their own discretion. Yes, even warnings from other users. It's perfectly fine for a user to remove comments (positive or negative) from their own user talk page, even if you dislike it. It's not okay for you to decide what they leave on their talk page though, so do not edit other users' talk pages in an effort to "fully disclose" any warnings they've received. Leebo⁸⁶ 23:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

This is from WP:User page: On a user's own talk page, policy does not prohibit the removal of comments at that user's discretion, although archival is preferred to removal. Please note, though, that removing warnings from one's own talk page is often frowned upon.

You are entitled to frown upon other editors' removal of warnings, but that is all. It explicitly states that it is allowed by policy. Leebo⁸⁶ 23:21, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I did not agree to mediate your dispute with Fighting for Justice. I left this message at the same time you left the first one on mine, it wasn't a reply. If I feel the need to talk to Fighting for Justice, I will, but he simply sounded justifiably frustrated by your inappropriate accusation of vandalism. His reasoning was logical. Leebo⁸⁶ 23:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Who's the admin condoning personal attacks? I'm neither an admin nor an editor condoning personal attacks. Leebo⁸⁶ 23:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Issues

Hi, if you want to can e-mail me, you can do that through this link. Garion96 (talk) 00:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Allegations

I don't know what issues you have with Ispy and others, but you need to find the proper channels to take any complaints you may have about them. I promise you that going all over the Wiki and accusing them of stalking/pedophilia is a very quick way to get banned. --InShaneee 05:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't really care what paperwork there may or may not be pertaining to this situation. If you can't discretely deal with any user conflict you may have through the proper channels you will be blocked for harassment. --InShaneee 07:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)