Talk:Lexmark
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Lexmark is part of WikiProject Bluegrass Region, a project which aims to coordinate work for and expand coverage of the Bluegrass region of Kentucky. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join or engage in discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's importance scale. | |
 |
Please explain ratings you add or change by editing this article's ratings summary page. | |
[edit] Good and bad
I'll agree that the Lexmark inkjet products are total crap. But their laser printers are the exact opposite. Even their cheaper printers include PostScript support and their higher-end printers are very heavy duty and their toners are rated for 20.000pgs whereas most laser printers these days have toner rated for 5.000pgs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.238.171.131 (talk) 08:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reads like an ad
Goodness, this entire article reads like one big promotional paper for Lexmark (with the exception of the court cases). From what I've heard and seen on the web, Lexmark's printers are cheap products that are temperamental and fragile. Many customers have complained about the quality and the overall view is negative. Mazin07 (C)/(T) 18:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- As someone who works for a company that sells them, this is our experience, as well. Don't forget that their ink is expensive, too. ;) Without something to cite, however, you can't state any of this in the article. You might take a look at PC World and PC Magazine's reader surveys of printers, though... 205.157.110.11 02:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Neglects to mention keyboards
Lexmark originally was a printer and a keyboard manufacturer. At some point keyboards commoditized and they got out of that business. But the fact that they had IBM's keyboard division used to be a very big deal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.240.36 (talk) 05:28, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
