Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The introduction to this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article with a good introductory style. |
Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||
Argued November 10, 1997 Decided March 3, 1998 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||
A district court conducting pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a) has no authority to invoke 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to assign a transferred case to itself for trial. | ||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||
Chief Justice: William Rehnquist Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer |
||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||
Majority by: Souter Joined by: Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer |
||||||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||||||
28 U.S.C. § 1407(a) |
Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26 (1998), unanimously held that a district court conducting pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a) has no authority to invoke 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to assign a transferred case to itself for trial.
On remand, a jury decided in favor of Lexecon and Daniel Fischel and against Milberg Weiss for $50 million; the case settled for that amount before the jury could decide punitive damages.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.