User talk:Leumi/81.130.175.55 v. Leumi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

81.130.175.55 Constantly removes anything negative about Norman Finkelstein on various pages related to him. Not sure if this qualifies as vandalism or simple obnoxious reverting. Oh, and makes personal attacks, starting many explanations for reverts by accusing me of sympathizing with the Irgun. Leumi

Leumi puts the same 'Finkelstein has been accused of Holocaust Denier, Anti-Semite etc' in EVERY article related to Finkelstein. Since calling Finkelstein a Holocaust Denier in the Palestinian refugee revision history, Leumi has been intent on inserting this into every article which mentions Finkelstein, attributing it to 'various groups' .This is indicative of non-neutral bias. He then claimed in the Norman Finkelstein talk page that ' I didn't say the accusations were true'. Leumi also deletes any criticism of his dishonesty.

You recently added "Leumi also deletes any criticism of his dishonesty".

Well I checked User 81. And removing Personal attacks is within the rules. Furthermore, this "criticism" was nothing more than a constantly repeated phrase accusing me of vandalism. Frankly speaking, at this point I'm tired of responding to you. So you now go rant as much as you want on this page, but I'm not going to respond to your provocations here anymore. However, I insist you stop your attacks on me in various Talk sections, as it goes against the rules of Wikipedia. (Will add this at the bottom as it is most recent) Leumi

I will repeat what I have already said in response to this: I have already stated that these statements are necessary to place in context Finkelstein's accusations against others, which are the only areas in which I have placed them in (two pages) in addition to his biography and book on the Holocaust where they have obvious relevance, furthermore, I have already explained that while I do believe they are true, I will not put that they were true in the article in the interest of neutral phrasing. I feel they should be included as they add necessary context. Furthermore, I would like to request an apology and a retraction of personal attacks you've made against me with no relevance to the actual discussion. (saying my name is taken from the name of the Irgun when it is in fact just a regular commonly used Hebrew word meaning national, and calling me "an irgun sympathizer" who was the last to edit the Irgun page)

After lying twice you expect ME to apologise? That's chutzpah. Stop your vandalism immeadiately. I will no longer edit said pages, since I know you will continue to vandalise them by putting in the same Finkelstein has been accused of Holocaust Denier, Anti-Semite etc' in all of them. Reader's of Wikipedia should be made fully aware of your agenda.

There are rules against personal attacks, furthermore I have already taken time to refute all your claims of lies, and I would like to request an apology for your personal attacks on me, of which are illegal and counterproductive. You, might I add, have instered the words:

"This page is inaccurate because of Leumi's continuing vandalism"
AND

"Leumi has vandalised several pages by putting the same 'Finkelstein has been accused of being a Holocaust Denier, Anti-Semite etc' in EVERY article related to Finkelstein. Since originally calling Finkelstein a Holocaust Denier in the Palestinian Refugee revision history, Leumi has been intent on inserting this into every article which mentions Finkelstein, attributing it to 'various groups' .This is indicative of non-neutral bias. He later claimed in the Norman Finkelstein talk page that ' I didn't say the accusations were true'"

On every page I have written in recently. That is vandalism and personal attacks, both illegal on this page. You have also vandalized my User Talk entry, which is highly against the rules.

You recently added "Leumi also deletes any criticism of his dishonesty". Well I checked User 81. And removing Personal attacks is within the rules. Furthermore, this "criticism" was nothing more than a constantly repeated phrase accusing me of vandalism. Frankly speaking, at this point I'm tired of responding to you. So you now go rant as much as you want on this page, but I'm not going to respond to your provocations here anymore. However, I insist you stop your attacks on me in various Talk sections, which I will delete if they contain no substance and are just constantly repeated versions of the same phrase, as it goes against the rules of Wikipedia. Leumi

I should note the I'm not the only one who is sick of Leumi's biased behaviour. In Talk:Palestinian_refugee, User:Zero0000 notes "I will not work on this page any more as it is a waste of time. The first three paragraphs contain some salvagable material but the rest is rubbish. Leumi's long paragraph is just standard right-wing "bash the victims" stuff. He didn't even bother to put in the key part of the UNRWA definition despite proving above that he knows about it. Then follow two standard junk "quotations" from people who are so important that that the internet never heard of them except for endless regurgitation of these "quotations". (I bet nobody here can even prove they existed.) After that, childish apologetics that even includes citation of the notorious racist forgery "From Time Immemorial". Having it there brings shame on Wikipedia, but with people around who think it is "scholarly" what is the point of trying to do anything about it?"

[[Leumi] has now taken to continually removing a quote from The Holocaust Industry article and replacing it with text that is already on another page.