User talk:Letseditstuff

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome from Ioeth

Welcome!

Hello, Letseditstuff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 20:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Michael Christie. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bongwarrior 23:48, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Christie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bongwarrior 01:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverted edits to Michael Christie

I have again reverted your edits to the Michael Christie article. If you would like to add information to Wikipedia about the "spelling bee underdog", please create a new article for him, rather than adding it to the article about the professional golfer. Thank you. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 20:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Michael Christie. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 20:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Michael I. Christie

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Michael I. Christie, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 21:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael I. Christie, you will be blocked from editing. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 21:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Michael Sujay Christie

A tag has been placed on Michael Sujay Christie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TonyBallioni 21:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)