User talk:Let's Migrate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Brexx.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block logcurrent autoblockseditslogs

sorry, I thought you were the vandal... J.delanoygabsadds 17:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Let's Migrate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Gwernol 17:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The main purpose of Wikipedia is to build the encyclopedia by adding sourced information to articles. While it is useful to talk to other users to discuss how to imrpvoe articles, its important to note that Wikipedia is not a social networking site, like MySpace or Facebook. If you are only looking to make friends, its likely that Wikipedia is not the right place for you. If you are interested in helping to build the encyclopedia, you are very welcome here. I'd suggest you start by reading the links above to get a better understanding of policy. One minor note: when you edit a talk page (such as mine) please sign your message - this is really easy to do, just type ~~~~ at the end of your message. Thanks, Gwernol 17:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Contents

Speedy deletion of Johnny carino's

A tag has been placed on Johnny carino's requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildthing61476 (talk) 17:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


Oh,sorry if i violated anything,i wont do it again,i was looking at the chili's restaurant article,and i saw that there is no article for carinos,so i created one,sorry if it was a bad idea.

Don't worry about. The article is back and I would invite you to expand it. CIreland (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

 ?

yes...??? Seki rs (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

the sims

i put it, but it's so simple, why the heck haven't YOU put it??? Seki rs (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing sockpuppet accounts to evade a block. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 17:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "unblock me,i didnt do anyhting wrong now...."


Decline reason: "The rules don't allow you to edit under any username when you have a username blocked; you are expected to wait until the block expires, or, if the block is indefinite, to stop editing. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "To Gwernol,you said this to me:If you wish to resume editing, you may only do so under your original Brexx account. Log back into that account and leave a polite unblock request and you might get unblocked - another admin will review it. and thats exactly what i did...and i was declined......so dont blame me for doing what im doing.....and all im doing lately is making good conributions to wiki,check........so why dwell on the past.....the past is the past....its history......were in the present....so,stop thinking about what happend before......i did what i did.....and now im only making good contibutions and not "vandalizing"....so i think i have a right to be unblock period..cause im currently not doing anything wrong,and i wont do....and gwernol,next time dont put me a message like this,if u dont mean it....."


Decline reason: "Per comment below. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Because no admin is going to unblock a sockpuppet, two requests is sufficient. To help you stop editing, I've protected this talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)