Talk:Lethal Injection (album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
 |
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by WikiProject Albums because it uses a stub template.
|
This is hard neutral...
NPOV header added. There is no way how this is written up this can be considered "neutral." Ghost Freeman 02:35, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia doesn't (I believe) allow for subjective reviews on the site. When I have time, I'll try and fix the article up. --PolPotPie 21:47, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This was a good album, with some dope tracks. It was well-enough-received in 1993, and even now singles from it are still in rotation (You know how we do it, Bop Gun, etc.). There is a problem with the article though: it is written as first-person review, but Wikipedia is not about reviews. The article has to be rewitten as a factual piece with as little personal review as possible. See :AmeriKKKa's Most Wanted for an example on how this needs to be done. 007 04:24, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
One question - when authoring an article on any creative work, does Wikipedia allow for a line or two saying, "Critics praised the album for its realistic lyrics/high production quality/etc...," i.e. a mention of subjective praise/criticism within an objective article? This seems like it would be alright, as it would be important to mention why the work is popular, well-liked, or famous.--PolPotPie 20:05, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
That's Definitely allowable, and I think that's also a must to mention the opinions of published critics. 007 02:09, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:103814.jpeg
I found Image:103814.jpeg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:103814.jpeg
Image:103814.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
