Talk:Lethal Enforcers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Controversy?
The game is included in the category of "Controversial games" and yet there is absolutely nothing about said controversy in the article. The entire article works more like a how-to guide on the game than anything else. What's going on here? 69.241.141.42 07:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
I agree. I'm writing a paper on video game controversy, and this article mentions nothing about how this game was controversial. Perhaps this could somehow be worked somewhere into the article? Joe D 13:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Found it - there was a little statement in "trivia". I'm asking for a citation as the only thing I could find was a single entry in a ~1994 handout that ignores the fact that shooting first without checking your target will cause you to lose the game. --Sigma 7 03:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Linkspam?
I was just wondering why the review of this game from Screwattack has been removed. Screwattack are an established UK video game website (also original home of the Angry Video Game Nerd) and I thought a review of said game would be relevant, but it has been classed as linkspam. Can anyone clarify why?
Before anyone asks, I am nothing to do with Screwattack, I tried to do a website once and it sucked!
Cheers
Eugenespeed (talk) 11:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)