Talk:Lest Darkness Fall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Padway and language

Is Martin Padway a Indiana Jones type archaeologist? I thought that if he could already read Latin language would not be much of a problem. 2007-07-24 Lena Synnerholm, Märsta, Sweden.

Padway is fluent in Classical Latin and modern Italian. His minor language problem is in adapting to the transitional Vulgate of the era, already half-way to becoming the Roman dialect of Italian. If I recall correctly, he is not good at spoken Gothic. --Orange Mike 21:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Padway and gunpowder

The way I understood the novel, Padway deliberately declined to make or introduce gunpowder, thinking the times were bloody enough already. 71.131.2.49 04:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)-Paul C

[edit] Padway and Mohammed

There has been a bit of controversy lately about whether Padway advocated to Justinian the killing of Mohammed at the end of the book, with User:75.181.120.74 posting on August 12 that he did. This has been reverted twice, first by me, and now (Aug. 13) Orange Mike. The original poster seems quite vehement on the issue, so I am stating the reasoning behind the reversion at greater length here.

As Mike correctly points out, the reference in the book is ambiguous, and does not support this conclusion. It could be interpreted as an invitation to assassination. It could also be interpreted as a call to either the conversion or the conquest of Arabia by the Byzantine Empire; the latter was how I viewed it on first reading the book.

The point is, no strong reading either way is warranted; the most that can be made of it is that Padway advocated preventing Mohammed's rise, due to the disruption it would cause to his project of preventing the Dark Ages. (In the real world, of course, the rise of Islam was both a negative and positive force, helping to preserve ancient knowledge even as it overran the ancient empires, but in the novel Padway had already preempted its positive contributions.) To say more is to force a conclusion that the actual text does not justify.

BPK 14:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)