From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Books (Rated Stub-Class) |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| WikiProject France (Rated Stub-Class) |
 |
Les jeux sont faits is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. |
|
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.) |
| WikiProject Films (Rated Stub-Class) (Rated Low importance) |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
|
| Editing Guidelines |
|
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
 Article upgrading needed: You can help! |
WP:IA |
|
Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films
- Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development.
To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met:
- Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
- Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
- Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.)
- Plot summary
- Include cast and crew information.
- At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
- Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))
Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF
Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. A possibility for American films from before 1964 would be a screenshot from the trailer, as these are now in the public domain. Please make sure fair use is properly observed, or the image will be removed. See WP:Films MOS for image guidelines and assistance in uploading. |
|
How can the book be "in 1952" and yet still be "made into a movie in 1947"? This seems counterintuitive, and some clarification would be appreciated. Nowalaters 23:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Indeed. Well, IMDb states that the film was produced in 1947 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0039512/). Yet, Amazon gives the following publishing information:
Publisher: Prentice Hall; 1 edition (April 1, 1952)
(http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0135306752/104-1040928-8514360?v=glance&n=283155)
Someone has to be wrong. My thought is that the publishing date is of the english translation, and not of the original text, but I've yet to find anything to confirm this.
--Sycron 20:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
Alright, this is what a french version of the text states (ISBN: 2070394824): "Ce scénario, conçu en 1943, a été publié pour la première fois en 1947. Un film en a été tiré la même année, adapté et réalisé par Jean Delannoy, avec Micheline Presle et Marcel Pagliero." So, he wrote it in 1943 but it was first published in 1947 with the film being made in the same year.
--Sycron 01:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
I added a little text at the beginning of the article (which should really be reworded; there's something I don't like about it, but I'm tired) because Les Jeux Sont Faits and The Game Is Up are not word-for-word translations, and thus I find the original
- "Les Jeux Sont Faits (The Game Is Up)"
to be misleading. Maybe I'm being picky. --^pirate 01:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
No, that's quite valid. I've changed the text to: "Les Jeux Sont Faits, literally "The Games Are Done", though more commonly known translated as The Game Is Up" --Sycron 20:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Just realized that I didn't read what I had written, and that it sounds ridiculous. Edited again. --Sycron 02:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stub No More?
I believe that that this piece is approaching article-status in that it provides a clear description of the subject with a relavent degree of scope, as well as having been parsed by several editors. Therefore, I'd move to suggest that it be given article status. I will proceed to do so in a few weeks time, if unopposed, in order to provide for a reasonable timeframe in which others might respond. --Sycron 18:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Disambig?
Why should this page be split up? This would only create stubs (ie. if splitting up the novel from the respective theatre and film adaptations) and the subject matter is all related, thus I find it hard to warrant splitting it up. --^pirate 18:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
I oppose this action on practical grounds. There simply isn't enough information regarding the film adaptation to warrant a separate article.--Sycron 19:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:09, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
