Talk:Lepidoptera/Archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] gender identification
I think we should include pictures or a link to a page showing how to identify most butterflies/moths by gender. I believe it is the same across the Order for pupa, and I know it's a lost cause for the larva, however, I think it would be helpful. I recently had a problem being able to find the information and think it would add to the wiki community. Unforunately, I don't know enough and my camera isn't fancy enough to take decent macro shots. -Kugamazog
[edit] superfamilies in taxobox
I have some doubts about the validity of superfamily lists in the taxobox. For one thing it makes the box unreasonably long. Also it seems to suggest that "moth" and "butterfly" are well defined classifications, which other pages here contradict. Perhaps such information should be included in the article body, not the taxobox. (unsigned comment by Zeimusu (talk · contribs)
- I looked at it and before, the taxo listed "over 130 families". I figured having the 46 superfamilies from one of the texts I'm working from (the Firefly Encyclopedia...I list in References) wasn't too bad. I'm currently working at stubbing out all of the moth superfamilies. I'm open for suggestion, but figured this was a slight improvement. If you (or anyone else for that matter) strongly disagree, I will not be offended. :) My plan is as follows:
- blue link all superfamiles (as stubs)
- slowly go through and fill the superfamilies out to the best of my sources.
I welcome any constructive criticism. Wikibofh 3 July 2005 00:27 (UTC)
-
- For what it's worth, I think Wikibofh's edits were helpful. It is true that there is no universally accepted distinction between moths and butterflies, but the schema presented here agrees with general wisdom (AFAIK). Wikipedia should have the (presumably layman) end user in mind when presenting information; while it might not be acceptable to rigidly divide the two groups of superfamilies in a scientific publication, it makes sense to here. Wikipedia isn't meant to stand in for specialized monographs on any given subject. If the taxobox moth/butterfly division is all that botherful, we could always include an explanatory footnote to explicitly state that the division is informal. (To disclaim my own text: I am not a lepidopterist, although I sometimes play one online.) -- Hadal 5 July 2005 06:58 (UTC)
It can be helpful to give non-taxonomic information in the taxobox, but it can be messy, for instance if we ever wanted to list suborders. I think it would be better to point out the two butterfly superfamilies in the article text. In the superfamily list, they can be distinguished with common names:
- Hesperioidea (skippers)
- Papilionoidea (most butterflies)
- Micropterigoidea
- ...
That might help draw attention to any important groups of moths, too. Josh
-
- So, you're proposing we remove the butterfly and moth headings from the taxobox, and put descriptions on the superfamilies? I don't have a problem with that. I thought the earlier concern was having the superfamilies in the taxobox at all. Generally speaking my preference is for the taxobox to only have the next most specific grouping, but that's just a personal preference. For instance I think that the Insect taxobox is a mess, confusing and not very logical, but that's just me. It could be for taxonomists it makes sense. Wikibofh 5 July 2005 20:49 (UTC)
-
- That's a fair alternative, and agrees with what we've been doing with fish articles. To do so here would require excising one of the two images (due to width issues), but that's no big deal. Regarding the insect taxobox, I think it's fairly well-organized, considering the material. In that taxobox the orders are subdivided by sub/infraclass; one reason for this is that not all schemes may use a given subclass, and that it provides easier access to the individual orders while giving the reader an at-a-glance idea of where everything fits. As for the superfamilies here: as long as you reference them (as you're doing), they're probably fine, provided we avoid conflicting schemes. If the Firefly Encyclopedia mentions taxonomic authorities for the superfamilies, it would be good to include those too (in the individual articles, of course). -- Hadal 6 July 2005 03:58 (UTC)
Actually I spent days figuring out the whole structure of the butterfly kingdom last winter and spent days doing the taxoboxes so that they were complete. Now that I look at it all my edits are gone practically. I find this whole thing insulting to say the least. No help from me. Williamb 09:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- I sympathise. I have had experience of this kind, though not to the scale experienced by you. It helps to post your vision and summary of work completed on this page because anyone contemplating major changes to a page would scan the talk page before proceeding.AshLin
[edit] Creation of WikiProject Lepidoptera
I would like to announce the creation of WikiProject Lepidoptera so that we have a forum to discuss and hassle out these issues. Regards, AshLin 06:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Moved material-Family classification
Can someone reorganize the following and add it back suitably into the article or perhaps as a new article on the classification... Most of the information is repeated in the lepidoptera box in the footer. Shyamal 10:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of currently accepted families
Family | Otherwise included in |
---|---|
Acanthopteroctetidae Davis, 1978 | |
Acrolepiidae Heinemann, 1870 | Plutellidae or Yponomeutidae |
Acrolophidae | Tineidae |
Adelidae Bruand, 1851 | |
Agathiphagidae Kristensen, 1967 | |
Agonoxenidae Meyrick, 1926 | Elastichidae or Coleophoridae |
Aididae | Megalopygidae |
Alucitidae Leach, 1815 | |
Anomoeotidae | |
Anomosetidae | |
Anthelidae | |
Arctiidae Leach, 1815 | |
Arrhenophanidae | |
Axiidae Rebel, 1919 | Noctuidae |
Batrachedridae Heinemann & Wocke, 1876 | Coleophoridae or Mompidae or Cosmopterigidae |
Bedelliidae Meyrick, 1880 | Lyonetiidae |
Blastobasidae Meyrick, 1894 | Coleophoridae |
Bombycidae Latreille, 1802 | |
Brachodidae Heppner, 1979 | Glyphipterigidae |
Brahmaeidae Swinhoe, 1892 | |
Bucculatricidae Wallengren, 1881 | |
Callidulidae | |
Carposinidae Walsingham, 1897 | |
Carthaeidae | |
Castniidae | |
Cecidosidae | Incurvariidae |
Choreutidae Stainton, 1854 | Glyphipterigidae |
Coleophoridae Bruand, 1851 | |
Copromorphidae | |
Cosmopterigidae Heinemann & Wocke, 1876 | |
Cossidae Leach, 1815 | |
Crambidae Latreille, 1810 | Pyralidae |
Crinopterygidae Spuler, 1898 | |
Cyclotornidae | |
Dalceridae | |
Doidae Donahue & Brown, 1987 | Arctiidae |
Douglasiidae Heinemann & Wocke, 1876 | |
Drepanidae Boisduval, 1828 | |
Dudgeoneidae | |
Elachistidae Bruand, 1851 | |
Endromidae Boisduval, 1828 | |
Epermeniidae Spuler, 1910 | |
Epicopeiidae | |
Epipyropidae Dyar, 1903 | |
Eriocottidae Spuler, 1898 | Incurvariidae |
Eriocraniidae Tutt, 1899 | |
Ethmiidae Busck, 1909 | Elachistidae |
Eupterotidae | |
Galacticidae | Plutellidae |
Gelechiidae Stainton, 1854 | |
Geometridae Leach, 1815 | |
Glyphipterigidae Stainton, 1854 | |
Gracillariidae Stainton, 1854 | |
Hedylidae | Geometridae |
Heliodinidae Heinemann & Wocke, 1876 | |
Heliozelidae Heinemann & Wocke, 1877 | |
Hepialidae Stephens, 1829 | |
Hesperiidae Latreille, 1809 | |
Heterobathmiidae | Micropterigidae |
Heterogynidae Herrich-Schäffer, 1846 | |
Himantopteridae | |
Holcopogonidae Gozmany, 1967 | Autostichidae |
Hyblaeidae | |
Immidae Heppner, 1977 | Glyphipterigidae |
Incurvariidae Spuler, 1898 | |
Lacturidae | Yponomeutidae |
Lasiocampidae Harris, 1841 | |
Lecithoceridae Le Marchand, 1947 | Gelechiidae |
Lemoniidae Dyar, 1896 | |
Limacodidae Duponchel, 1845 | |
Lophocoronidae Common, 1973 | |
Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 | |
Lymantriidae Hampson, 1893 | |
Lyonetiidae Stainton, 1854 | |
Lypusidae Heinemann, 1870 | Tineidae or Psychidae or Yponomeutidae |
Megalopygidae | |
Metachandidae Meyrick, 1911 | Oecophoridae or Gelechiidae |
Micropterigidae Herrich-Schäffer, 1855 | |
Mimallonidae | |
Mirinidae | Bombycidae |
Mnesarchaeidae | |
Momphidae Herrich-Schäffer, 1857 | Coleophoridae |
Neopseustidae | |
Neotheoridae Kristensen, 1978. | |
Nepticulidae Stainton, 1854 | |
Noctuidae Latreille, 1809 | |
Nolidae Hampson, 1894 | Noctuidae |
Notodontidae Stephens, 1829 | |
Nymphalidae Rafinesque, 1815 | |
Oecophoridae Bruand, 1851 | |
Oenosandridae Miller, 1991 | Notodontidae (Thaumatopoeidae) |
Opostegidae Meyrick, 1893 | |
Palaeosetidae | |
Palaephatidae | Tineidae |
Pantheidae Smith, 1898 | Noctuidae |
Papilionidae Latreille, 1802 | |
Pieridae Duponchel, 1835 | |
Plutellidae Guenee, 1845 | Yponomeutidae |
Prodoxidae Riley, 1881 | |
Prototheoridae | |
Psychidae Boisduval, 1828 | |
Pterolonchidae Meyrick, 1918 | Coleophoridae |
Pterophoridae Zeller, 1841 | |
Pyralidae Latreille, 1802 | |
Riodinidae Grote, 1895 | Lycaenidae |
Roeslerstammiidae Bruand, 1850 | |
Saturniidae Boisduval, 1837 | |
Schreckensteiniidae Fletcher, 1929 | |
Scythrididae Rebel, 1901 | |
Sematuridae | |
Sesiidae Boisduval, 1828 | |
Simaethistidae | Pyralidae |
Somabrachyidae Hampson, 1920 | Megalopygidae |
Sphingidae Latreille, 1802 | |
Symmocidae Gozmany, 1957 | Autostichidae |
Thyrididae Herrich-Schäffer, 1846 | |
Tineidae Latreille, 1810 | |
Tineodidae Meyrick, 1885 | |
Tischeriidae Spuler, 1898 | |
Tortricidae Latreille, 1802 | |
Uraniidae | |
Urodidae Kyrki, 1984 | |
Whalleyanidae | Thyrididae |
Yponomeutidae Stephens, 1829 | |
Ypsolophidae Guenee, 1845 | Yponomeutidae |
Zygaenidae Latreille, 1809 |
[edit] List of relegated families
The following groups have been ranked as families in the fairly recent past, and the family names are still likely to be met with in books and on the internet. This list shows where the supposed families are now classified.
[edit] Classification according to Fauna Europaea
Classification of European Lepidoptera | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Superfamily: | Family: | Subfamily: | |||
Acanthopteroctetoidea | Acanthopteroctetidae | ||||
Alucitoidea | Alucitidae | ||||
Axioidea | Axiidae | ||||
Bombycoidea | Brahmaeidae | ||||
Endromidae | |||||
Lemoniidae | |||||
Mirinidae | |||||
Saturniidae | Agliinae | ||||
Saturniinae | |||||
Sphingidae | Macroglossinae | ||||
Smerinthinae | |||||
Sphinginae | |||||
Choreutoidea | Choreutidae | Choreutinae | |||
Millierinae | |||||
Copromorphoidea | Carposinidae | ||||
Cossoidea | Cossidae | Cossinae | |||
Zeuzerinae | |||||
Drepanoidea | Drepanidae | Drepaninae | |||
Thyatirinae | |||||
Epermenioidea | Epermeniidae | Epermeniinae | |||
Ochromolopinae | |||||
Eriocranioidea | Eriocraniidae | ||||
Galacticoidea | Galacticidae | ||||
Gelechioidea | Agonoxenidae | ||||
Amphisbatidae | Amphisbatinae | ||||
Autostichidae | Autostichinae | ||||
Holcopogoninae | |||||
Symmocinae | |||||
Batrachedridae | |||||
Blastobasidae | |||||
Chimabachidae | |||||
Coleophoridae | |||||
Cosmopterigidae | Antequerinae | ||||
Chrysopeleiinae | |||||
Cosmopteriginae | |||||
Deoclonidae | |||||
Depressariidae | Cryptolechiinae | ||||
Depressariinae | |||||
Elachistidae | |||||
Ethmiidae | |||||
Gelechiidae | Dichomeridinae | ||||
Gelechiinae | |||||
Pexicopiinae | |||||
Lecithoceridae | Ceuthomadarinae | ||||
Lecithocerinae | |||||
Oditinae | |||||
Momphidae | |||||
Oecophoridae | Deuterogoniinae | ||||
Oecophorinae | |||||
Pterolonchidae | |||||
Schistonoeidae | |||||
Scythrididae | |||||
Stathmopodidae | |||||
Geometroidea | Geometridae | Alsophilinae | |||
Archiearinae | |||||
Desmobathrinae | |||||
Ennominae | |||||
Geometrinae | |||||
Larentiinae | |||||
Orthostixinae | |||||
Sterrhinae | |||||
Uraniidae | Epipleminae | ||||
Gracillarioidea | Bucculatricidae | ||||
Douglasiidae | |||||
Gracillariidae | Gracillariinae | ||||
Lithocolletinae | |||||
Phyllocnistinae | |||||
Roeslerstammiidae | |||||
Hepialoidea | Hepialidae | ||||
Hesperioidea | Hesperiidae | Hesperiinae | |||
Heteropterinae | |||||
Pyrginae | |||||
Incurvarioidea | Adelidae | Adelinae | |||
Nematopogoninae | |||||
Crinopterygidae | |||||
Heliozelidae | |||||
Incurvariidae | |||||
Prodoxidae | |||||
Lasiocampoidea | Lasiocampidae | Chondrosteginae | |||
Lasiocampinae | |||||
Malacosominae | |||||
Pinarinae | |||||
Poecilocampinae | |||||
Micropterigoidea | Micropterigidae | ||||
Nepticuloidea | Nepticulidae | Nepticulinae | |||
Opostegidae | Oposteginae | ||||
Opostegoidinae | |||||
Noctuoidea | Arctiidae | Arctiinae | |||
Lithosiinae | |||||
Syntominae | |||||
Lymantriidae | Arctorninae | ||||
Calliterinae | |||||
Lymantrinae | |||||
Nygmininae | |||||
Orgyinae | |||||
Noctuidae | Acontiinae | ||||
Acronictinae | |||||
Aedeiinae | |||||
Amphipyrinae | |||||
Bagisarinae | |||||
Bryophilinae | |||||
Calpinae | |||||
Catocalinae | |||||
Condicinae | |||||
Cuculliinae | |||||
Dilobinae | |||||
Eublemminae | |||||
Eustrotiinae | |||||
Euteliinae | |||||
Hadeninae | |||||
Heliothinae | |||||
Herminiinae | |||||
Hypeninae | |||||
Micronoctuinae | |||||
Noctuinae | |||||
Pantheinae | |||||
Plusiinae | |||||
Raphiinae | |||||
Rivulinae | |||||
Strepsimaninae | |||||
Tytinae | |||||
Nolidae | Chloephorinae | ||||
Eariadinae | |||||
Nolinae | |||||
Notodontidae | Notodontinae | ||||
Phalerinae | |||||
Ptilodoninae | |||||
Pygaerinae | |||||
Stauropinae | |||||
Thaumetopoeidae | Thaumetopoeinae | ||||
Papilionoidea | Lycaenidae | Lycaeninae | |||
Riodininae | |||||
Nymphalidae | Apaturinae | ||||
Charaxinae | |||||
Danainae | |||||
Heliconiinae | |||||
Libytheinae | |||||
Limenitidinae | |||||
Melitaeinae | |||||
Nymphalinae | |||||
Satyrinae | |||||
Papilionidae | Papilioninae | ||||
Parnassiinae | |||||
Pieridae | Coliadinae | ||||
Dismorphiinae | |||||
Pierinae | |||||
Pterophoroidea | Pterophoridae | Agdistinae | |||
Pterophorinae | |||||
Pyraloidea | Crambidae | Acentropinae | |||
Cathariinae | |||||
Crambinae | |||||
Cybalomiinae | |||||
Evergestinae | |||||
Glaphyriinae | |||||
Odontiinae | |||||
Pyraustinae | |||||
Schoenobiinae | |||||
Scopariinae | |||||
Spilomelinae | |||||
Pyralidae | Epipaschiinae | ||||
Galleriinae | |||||
Phycitinae | |||||
Pyralinae | |||||
Schreckensteinioidea | Schreckensteiniidae | ||||
Sesioidea | Brachodidae | ||||
Castniidae | |||||
Sesiidae | Sesiinae | ||||
Tinthiinae | |||||
Thyridoidea | Thyrididae | ||||
Tineoidea | Eriocottidae | ||||
Lypusidae | |||||
Psychidae | Epichnopteryginae | ||||
Naryciinae | |||||
Oiketicinae | |||||
Placodominae | |||||
Psychinae | |||||
Taleporiinae | |||||
Typhoniinae | |||||
Tineidae | Dryadaulinae | ||||
Euplocaminae | |||||
Hapsiferinae | |||||
Hieroxestinae | |||||
Meessiinae | |||||
Myrmecozelinae | |||||
Nemapogoninae | |||||
Perissomasticinae | |||||
Scardiinae | |||||
Setomorphinae | |||||
Stathmopolitinae | |||||
Teichobiinae | |||||
Tineinae | |||||
Tischerioidea | Tischeriidae | ||||
Tortricoidea | Tortricidae | Chlidanotinae | |||
Olethreutinae | |||||
Tortricinae | |||||
Urodoidea | Urodidae | ||||
Yponomeutoidea | Acrolepiidae | ||||
Bedelliidae | |||||
Glyphipterigidae | Glyphipteriginae | ||||
Orthoteliinae | |||||
Heliodinidae | |||||
Lyonetiidae | Cemiostominae | ||||
Lyonetiinae | |||||
Plutellidae | |||||
Yponomeutidae | Argyresthiinae | ||||
Praydinae | |||||
Scythropiinae | |||||
Yponomeutinae | |||||
Ypsolophidae | Ochsenheimeriinae | ||||
Ypsolophinae | |||||
Zygaenoidea | Epipyropidae | ||||
Heterogynidae | |||||
Limacodidae | |||||
Somabrachyidae | |||||
Zygaenidae | Chalcosiinae | ||||
Procridinae | |||||
Zygaeninae |
-
- This is beautiful! But I see it only has those taxa that occur in Europe. Sigh. It would probably be too long (and difficult to construct as a table?) if it included the global taxa, even if the subfamilies were relegated to the family pages. BTW, is there an easy way to make tables?
- Is there a preferred source for the systematic treatments, such as Kristensen, or Scoble ? Satyrium 14:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] image
i replaced the old picture with an FA-quality moth. enjoy. --The Lizard Wizard 06:35, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] number of species
The article lists the number of lepidoptera species as 180,000. The website [1] claims to have 260,000 accepted names. TeunSpaans 22:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nice picture
Image:Grand paon de nuit.jpg If somebody feels like inserting it into the article... Ajor 12:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Image:Grand paon de nuit 2.jpg This one is even better... Ajor 12:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- The id is Saturnia pyri (Family Saturnidae). In English called as the Giant Peacock Moth or the Giant Emperor Moth. Added to the article. AshLin 14:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)