User talk:Leonoel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Leonoel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Kimchi.sg 12:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] San Luis Rassini

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the San Luis Rassini article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Kimchi.sg 12:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Public domain

I think you need to read up on what public domain is. It's not the same as "available to the public". Conscious 10:41, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FACINGUNAM.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:FACINGUNAM.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Faculty of Engineering (UNAM)

A tag has been placed on Faculty of Engineering (UNAM) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Printer222 (talk) 11:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Faculty of Engineering (UNAM)

The article Faculty of Engineering (UNAM) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTonyâ„¢ talk 16:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Restored

Hi there Leonoel. I've restored this article, as I've litle doubt that there's a presumption of notability in this case, given it's a core faculty at one of the leading & largest educational institutions in the Americas. However, may I suggest that in order to avoid such potential confusions in future, that you write a little more detail on why/how the institution is significant, both in a national and international context. Things like, whether it's the largest engineering faculty in the country (don't know if it is, but it ought to be close to it), or what national/international research projects it is involved in, notable faculty and graduates, and so on. References and articles in the local or international academic press would help also.

Keep up the good work, saludos --cjllw ʘ TALK 04:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)