User talk:Leo Lazauskas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Unreasoned edits
Another (of many possible) example! Very annoying: Have you actually visited the Rangitata Island airfield? Paul Beardsell 12:04, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- It claims it is is "impressive and growing". Unsourced and weaselish. [leo, presumably]
So, you've never been there. You have no reason for doubting that the collection is growing. If the article said the collection was "reducing and unimpressive" would you have removed those words? What you are doing is close to vandalism! I know weasel words when I see them, but now you have taken me from knowing that at least ONE person is impressed and that ONE person thinks the collection is growing to a position where I do not know that. The best thing to do would be to leave alone. At least a citation request does not destroy info. But here you are, removing info! Please stop. Paul Beardsell 15:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- If I think it deserves a tag, it gets one. Leo 15:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
In this case you removed info, you did not add a tag. Paul Beardsell 15:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I did, didn't I. Shoo. Leo 15:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
No, you did not[1]. I'm not going anywhere until your edits are made with a little more thought and consideration so that, for instance, you can remember what you have and have not done. Paul Beardsell 16:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
No worries, d00d. However, keep in mind that I don't take advice from your type. You are just here for my amusement. Leo 16:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Benji Olson
I noticed that you tagged the article Benji Olson with a tag that information in the article may become dated. What information in that article could potentially become dated? I can't find anything myself. Please tell me what it is that you find to be dated - I will try to improve it if it needs improving. Otherwise, I will remove the tag. --TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
