<span title="If you forgot to sign, I'll put an —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) comment by your comment. Oh, and don't forget to be nice. This user is very innocent. Thank you! lol :)" style="border-bottom:1px dotted">Place your mouse over this text and read the label.

05:42, 26 March 2007 Wafulz (Talk | contribs) blocked "LegoAxiom1007 (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) 
with an expiry time of 31 hours (abuse of WP:TW, minor trolling, has been warned)

[edit] Apartment

Regarding your recent edit to Apartment, do you think it might be better to add the disambiguation page? I think the previous editors attempt at clarity was well meaning. --Jrsnbarn 02:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Well actually, I'm not sure if I can create that disambiguation page for that. I probably don't know the names of them. Please go to my user talk page to reply there if you have any questions regarding that quote. 'Cuz I'm also not sure if I have done any vandalism there. Best Regards. LegoAxiom1007 03:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

At the top of your talk page (above) you ask that other users "Please continue any conversation where it was started." Could you please do the same. Thanks. I will add a disambiguation note at the top of Apartment.--Jrsnbarn 15:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requests for protection

Why do you keep requesting protection for templates just created? When a template is new and rarely used, it is not a high risk template. -Amarkov moo! 05:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Please don't make requests for protection for templates you have just made, and aren't being used anywhere. We do not protect templates unless they are very high risk (i.e. used on many hundreds of pages), and we certainly don't block templates that one user has just made. – Riana ^ঋ 05:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requests for protection, again

If only one person is vandalizing a page, then the right thing to do is warn them with user warning templates, and then request blocking at WP:AIV if they continue. Protecting the page for one editor would unfairly shut out a lot of good edits. -Amarkov moo! 21:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] UHH....

Have you forgot about this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:The_Phoenix_Enforcer#Helpme The Phoenix Enforcer 01:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reporting usernames on VIP (old name for WP:AIV)

Do us a favor and check to see if they have already been blocked first. The last two you reported were blocked months ago. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 16:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

• Please stop. You are reporting names that are already blocked. If you continue we're going to think you're a bot. Nardman1 16:48, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Now you're reporting people whose vandalism occurred in 2005 and who don't have any talk page warnings. This is getting ridiculous. Nardman1 16:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Username complaint

I moved your username complaint on User:I-am-ben-12346 to WP:RFCN. You might want to elaborate on the problem with the name there. Cheers! --Ginkgo100^talk 17:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Usernames at AIV

Please don't use automatic rollback scripts on my edits, as you did here. Save that for the vandals, please. And please don't list what are far from clear-cut username "violations" at AIV: the correct place for those is WP:RFCN. Moreover, when a user in good standing removes the username from AIV as not clear-cut, that is a very clear sign that RFCN is the more appropriate venue. So don't revert in the first place, and not automatically. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 17:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Do not remove the opinions of others in [1] manner. Do that again and you will be blocked. Quit trolling. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 17:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Then stop making highly dubious reverts in an inappropriate manner. Furthermore, this page flashing is highly distracting and annoying. Moreschi ^{Request a recording?} 18:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:New messages

Template:New messages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Nardman1 18:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for 31 hours for abusing WP:TW. Please save it for obvious vandalism only. Continued abuse of rollback scripts could lead to a longer, or possibly indefinite, block. --Wafulz 18:44, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism Alert

I can barely see some vandalism from this edit from Blah. Can you please revert it? IsuzuAxiom1007 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Test

I did not test on that image, or any. Look back at the history. I was making an edit summary test on the sandbox, and the enter button caused me to save changes instead of showing the preview.--Wikipedier (talk • contribs) 04:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] El Tigre (TV series)

I've undone your move of this article. We name things based on what they are, not who makes them. --Wafulz 04:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Page protection

Pages are only protected under certain circumstances. In the event of frequent, persistent vandalism, pages are semi-protected so only registered users can edit them. In the event of a massive content dispute or office actions, pages are protected so only administrators can edit them. Please don't list pages for protection that don't meet these circumstances. --Wafulz 04:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I recommend you stop using TWINKLE for a while

You seem to be having problems with using it correctly. Until you've gotten enough experience not to do things like your recent requests for protection, or warning people for months-old vandalism, I think you should force yourself to do things manually. -Amarkov moo! 04:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree. TWINKLE is a powerful tool, and shouldn't really be used by new users, or until you've got a really good grasp of policies like WP:PPOL and WP:VAND. I recommend you start with manually patrolling Special:Recentchanges, use warning templates from WP:TT and don't ask for protection unless the page is very highly vandalised, or very likely to pose a significant threat if unprotected. – Riana ^talk 05:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

We're not forcing you to do it, we're recommending it. You can just remove it from your monobook to stop yourself using it, and put it back in after, say, a month, when you feel like you've gotten a good enough handle on policies. – Riana ^talk 05:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I highly suggest you to read the welcome message below to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies if you continue to use Twinkle. Real96 05:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, LegoAxiom1007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Miranda 09:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Helpme 9

Just have a visit at WP:RENAME! Call back if you have any questions. Hope you don't mind if I remove the help tag now. [Mαc Δαvιs] (How's my driving?) ❖ 16:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Policy Question

Policy states that WP is not a web host. I wanted to know how long one must be registered and not contributing for his user page to be deleted.--Orthologist 15:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Vandarticle

Template:Vandarticle has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Nardman1 20:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MfD nomination of User:LegoAxiom1007/monobook.js

User:LegoAxiom1007/monobook.js was nominated for deletion by me. You can comment on the discussion here. Nardman1 01:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Note, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LegoAxiom1007/monobook.js, has been closed without deletion. The larger issue raised was that of improper editing. See the replies towards the end of this page. Disruptive editing will result in increasinly longer blocks. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Proposal to ban

Please see this proposal. While I feel your recent use of twinkle is not enough to merit such an action, you might want to state your case and refrain from using twinkle until you know what you're doing. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 01:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removing the sandbox header

You were warned on 23 March 2007 not to remove the sandbox header. [2]. You did it again today. [3]. Please do not remove the header. Nardman1 02:00, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Naming conventions

Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Lowercase_second_and_subsequent_words_in_titles: "Do not capitalize second and subsequent words unless the title is a proper noun (such as a name) or is otherwise almost always capitalized." Please adhere to this policy and stop moving pages to capitalize the titles. Such as you did here [4] and here [5]. The correct titles are "Spanish language" and "Grilled cheese sandwich" in normal English. Nardman1 03:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Help me at Will Mcwhinney jr.!!!!

please, help!!!Sojcmbi Pinola

[edit] Image sources

Do NOT remove image source tags from images until the source is provided as you did here [6]. You must provide source information (Where did you get the image, who owns the copyright). Nardman1 03:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• Furthermore, fair use tags require fair use rationales. Please read WP:FUC. Nardman1 03:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Don't just add some text and remove the tags. What you need to do is specify the EXACT SOURCE of the image, the URL you got it from, or wherever, you need to say who owns the image, you need to specify a fair use rationale. If you need help writing a rationale, ask and someone will help you. Nardman1 04:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Oh and your superduty image isn't allowed, because fair use doesn't let you modify the image. Nardman1 04:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Uno Dice

This article appears to be a copyvio from [7]. Do not copy text from other websites without permission. (And it should be noted they copied the rules straight from the game without permission.) Nardman1 03:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Check Again

I wish you would check more carefully before accusing someone of vandalism. I used the Sandbox to experiment!!! I inserted a {{talkheader}} template as an experiment and then moved on. I removed nothing. Please look at the entire history log before making loose accusations. Thank you. StudierMalMarburg 16:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Helpme 10

On my popups, on the right from the word "contributions" says "tree". Can you tell me what "tree" (on the right of "contributions") is?

It allows you to check which namespaces, then pages this user edited the most. Just follow the links to navigate in the contributions. I just tried it on me, that's quite interesting ;). I hope that helps! -- lucasbfr ^talk 17:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stop it

I'm not sure if you are really a complete fool or just pretending to be one for trolling reasons but if I see any more silly edits from you I will be blocking you. Do not reply to help me tags, do not use twinkle. Consider yourself warned. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

For the next week, I want you to edit articles. As in, the encyclopedia. Do not issue user warnings or deal with policy pages until you have shown substantially more familiarity with Wikipedia and its processes. If you violate this admonition or Theresa's just above, it is very likely that an administrator is going to decide that you are just deliberately wasting everyone's time and block this account indefinitely. Newyorkbrad 21:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Lego, you're not getting the message. You're still using Twinkle, and we've asked you very politely to stop, and concentrate on actual article editing. You're wasting everyone's time, with invalid AIV reports and warning people for edits that aren't vandalism. Please, consider this your last warning, and I do mean your last warning. – Riana ^talk 05:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:helpme

Hi. Thanks for responding so quickly to the helpme tag on my talk page, but just letting you know, that wasn't me that put the tag there, it was a ctrl/c ctrl/v from another talk page to reply on mine. Sorry if there was any confusion- CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 08:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Helpme

You can do this by creating a ser-sub page such as User:LegoAxiom1007/Autographs and leave a message at the top asking people to sign if they see it, for more information see WP:USERPAGE. Regards - Tellyaddict 16:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dude, quit it

Quit it with the dodgy edits. Like here [8] and here [9]. The ndash looks better than the hyphen in a date range and "2003/2004" has a specific meaning in automobile manufacture, ie it refers to a model year. Replacing it with "2004" COMPLETELY CHANGES THE MEANING. Here you used popups [10] despite an order to stop using any automated scripts. Here you reverted [11] and warned [12] a user for removing "King Kirk" from an article, when in fact he was reverting an earlier vandalism. Are you editing seriously here? Do you honestly think something like "King Kirk" is for real? Here you changed another user's comment on a talk page [13] and not only that, YOU GOT IT WRONG. The edit to Wikipedia was not the edit in February being warned of there. Furthermore, changing other people's comments on talk pages is NOT ALLOWED. Here [14] you once again reported someone to WP:AIV who had not edited for months, as you've been warned not to do. The responding admin was understandably incredulous [15] If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia in this manner, you will be blocked. Final Warning. Nardman1 22:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

And it looks as if you're reported. I'm disappointed you're persisting with your behaviour. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 23:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

AIV rejected the report. [16] Nardman1 23:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

At least this revision was legitimate. That is what those nifty tools are for. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 23:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that is what you use the tool for. Check the edit log and you'll find many poor edits you can revert. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 23:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Stop encouraging him to use it. Nardman1 23:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Helpme

{{helpme|How do I add flashy graphics on my autographs page?}}

Perhaps you should work on the encyclopedia or go outside instead. Wikipedia is not Myspace. —Centrx→talk • 23:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Helpme

Why is Wikipedia not MySpace?

Because it's an encyclopedia, and encyclopedias are not Myspace. -Amarkov moo! 04:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your AIV report

Users do not get blocked for vandalizing once, especially not without anything past a first warning. I really recommend you just focus on something other than projectspace, before someone gets frustrated and blocks you. -Amarkov moo! 05:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Enough

It's pretty clear that you have ignored my request to stop playing silly buggers so I am blocking you for a week for disruption. When you come back - do not use any scripts whatsoever. Do not create stupid articles that someone then has to delete. Do not use "help me" and do not answer any help me queries. Do not speak to any new users. Do not report anyone for vandalism. Do not do anything except edit the encylopedia. If you ignore this and waste any more wikipedians time I will block you permenantly.Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 06:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I was very close to doing the same thing, and endorse this block. Newyorkbrad 07:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Same here. Please try to make positive contributions when you come back, or I or another admin will block your account indefinitely. – Riana ^talk 07:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Not surprised. 24.185.34.152 16:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Since you've repeatedly ignored directions from several administrators and are clearly trying to waste our time, you have been blocked indefinitely. --Wafulz 17:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] {{Unsigned8}}

Please always remember to close your html tags--VectorPotential^Talk 18:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock Request

• Err, you applied to use vandalproof! Nardman1 00:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually, sir, someone was declined from me. Thanks for the comment, though. ;-) IsuzuAxiom1007 (talk • contribs • Sign here!) 00:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

• You are not allowed to use any automated tools, such as vandalproof. Applying to use it shows stubborn intent to disrupt. Nardman1 01:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

• You weren't denied. I reverted it because you were not supposed to be applying for scripts. --Wafulz 02:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Why did you apply for the script? I do not understand your motives here. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 08:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A few questions

Why were u a vandal? Bluwiki123 15:45, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:User Popups

A tag has been placed on Template:User Popups requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)