Talk:Legal nurse consultant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment to Wiki Editors): The lack of any citations/sources (other than citations back to the author's own websites, which were removed numerous times in the past), puts this board back on the chopping block. It is perfectly clear who is writing these ads (Vickie Milazzo and her "Institute"). Why has Wiki tolerated this nonsense? Can we suggest that her IP address be forever blocked? She alone has caused a great deal of problems on this board. A number of websites refer to this article, which is changed on a weekly basis. It is unfair, unprofessional, unethical and violates your rules on spam.

[edit] Spam posted by Vickie Milazzo Institute (aka LegalNurse.com)

Comment to Wiki Editors): The lack of any citations/sources (other than citations back to the author's own websites, which were removed numerous times in the past), puts this board back on the chopping block. It is perfectly clear who is writing these ads (Vickie Milazzo and her "Institute"). Why has Wiki tolerated this nonsense? Can we suggest that her IP address be forever blocked? She alone has caused a great deal of problems on this board. A number of websites refer to this article, which is changed on a weekly basis. It is unfair, unprofessional, unethical and violates your rules on spam.

The page ought to be removed. It was at one stage reasonably informative until one advertiser threatened to sue Wikipedia if their competitor's links weren't removed. It is absurd to cave into these people's commercially-motivated demands, and it is more absurd to allow them to continually post advertising spam. Remove the article permanently I say - make them pay for their own advertising. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.178.238.235 (talk) 07:42, 7 May 2008 (UTC)