Talk:Legal Action Comics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove |auto=yes from this template. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the |class= parameter in this template and removing the stub template from the article. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

I didn't create the listing for Legal Action Comics on Wikipedia; I just happened along earlier today, saw that the listing existed, and tried to flesh out the information, (which had been minimal to the point of uselessness.

I see now that someone's deleted the info I posted about my book because "I have a financial stake." Does that mean that the info I posted would be just fine, provided it was posted by someone other than me?

It strikes me as either stupid, lazy, or hostile, (perhaps all three) that someone opted to delete the entirety of the info I posted, rather than editing it to adjust the tone.

I'm going to restore the info I posted in its entirety, and if someone thinks the tone of it is too self-aggrandizing, I invite that person to make whatever minor changes are needed to achieve the desired neutrality. Dannyhellman 05:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

It looks suspiciously like a text-dump to me. Has this text appeared on another website or in print? If so it is very likely copyrighted. Even if you wrote this yourself, but it was used previously in another context, I think you might need to explicitly release it under a free licsence or into the public domain. ike9898 16:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it's text from my website.

Yes, I wrote it myself.

No, it's not copyrighted.

Now then, will you folks please stop deleteing the text in its entirety? If there are elements in the text that you feel are self-aggrandizing or otherwise undesirable, I invite you to make those edits. Dannyhellman 16:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

This website says explictly that "entire contents of this website copyright 2004 Danny Hellman". Now it is clear that this content is NOT ALLOWED on Wikipedia until the above mentioned conditions are met. Wikipedia respects intellectual property rights, and as an artist you should appreciate this. ike9898 17:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

I built the site, and I wrote the text. I'm telling you here and now, for the record, for the purposes of Wikipedia and this argument: I hereby forthwith officially and unilaterally rescind, revoke, and renounce any and all copyright over the text you keep deleting.

I'm trying my best to remain polite, Ike9898, but this is starting to feel like a pissing contest. Shouldn't you be busy somewhere processing the protein portion of agricultural commodities? Dannyhellman 19:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't make the rules. Repeatedly submitting copyrighted text can get you blocked. ike9898 19:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] (copied from User talk:Dannyhellman)

Hello! I was asked to take a look at the situation by Ike9898. While I understand your frustration, let's try and keep calm; getting angry at each other isn't going to do anything but aggravate the situation. Regarding the copying of content: we, unfortunately, cannot accept any material copied from most web pages unless the content is explicitly licensed under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). If you are the author of the material and would like to do so, please review the terms of the license and send an email to [1] or [2] from the email listed in the website and state that the content is released under the GFDL. Please note that doing so allows anyone to copy and reuse the text. While this may seem like a hassle, this is done in order to ensure that no one gratuitously releases the text for you; this is done for security and legal reasons as well. Until then, we cannot accept the text - once you send an email, a member of the permissions/email team will then place the text on the page and verify that the text has been released. For now, though, we can't use the material. Thanks for your understanding! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)