User talk:Lebweb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Speedy deletion of Brian John Converse 1.1 Deletion tag 2 Speedy deletion of Brian John Converse 3 AfD nomination of Brian John Converse 4 AfD template 5 Copyright problems

[edit] Speedy deletion of Brian John Converse

A tag has been placed on Brian John Converse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SaveThePoint (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion tag

Just so you know, you really aren't supposed to remove the db-bio tag from pages you created. Leave it there so we all know what's going on...this is supposed to be a transparent process. Also, if you could post a justification for your article's notability on the discussion page per the guidelines in WP:Notability, it would be helpful. Thanks, SaveThePoint (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Brian John Converse

A tag has been placed on Brian John Converse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Carados (talk) 00:55, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Brian John Converse

I have nominated Brian John Converse, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian John Converse. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SaveThePoint (talk) 00:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD template

Removal of the AfD template on Brian John Converse is considered vandalism. If you continue, you may be blocked. SaveThePoint (talk) 01:52, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, U.S. 102nd Infantry Regiment, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/1-102in.htm. As a copyright violation, U.S. 102nd Infantry Regiment appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. U.S. 102nd Infantry Regiment has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:U.S. 102nd Infantry Regiment and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:U.S. 102nd Infantry Regiment with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:U.S. 102nd Infantry Regiment.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Samosa Poderosa (talk) 01:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)