Talk:Lebesgue-Stieltjes integration
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is there a good reason why some math pages have an annoying message in front about what to do if you don't understand the article? It seems rather condescending and insulting to me. Gene Ward Smith 04:32, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I think it's because many people would be quite confused if they arrived at such pages through, say, the Random page feature. The message suggests places they could look to gain some background to the topic, as a compromise between including high-level mathematical content and an audience that is (presumably) not so mathematically-minded. I think that it is a good idea, but this is not to say that it couldn't be improved. Ben Cairns 07:40, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC).
-
- I am also for removing that message "an audience that is (presumably) not so mathematically-minded" -> that would apply to every particular topic in science. Diego Torquemada 09:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] example
could you please show me some simple example of Lebesgue-Stieltjes integration?
Added example Oded (talk) 21:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Lebesgue-Stieltjes additive set function
where is that?
Right. This is really unexplained. I will try to put this in sometime this week. Oded (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC)