User talk:Leavepower
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No messages
Contents |
[edit] edits to History of Korea
Hi, Leavepower. I saw that you made quite a significant addition to the article. The article is already quite corpulent and full of details on all aspects of Korean history that actually belong in the separate articles that form Korean history. Much of the material that you placed in the article is already discussed and so seems quite repetitive. However, there are many other articles that discuss topics that are related to your edit on History of Korea. Perhaps you could place the same text in one of those articles? Or perhaps you could try and work with improving the existing text by adding and/or replacing smaller chunks of article text in History of Korea itself? Happy editing! Mumun 無文 19:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- ok. i don't care.Leavepower 19:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- You wrote some interesting things, especially about the Palaeolithic. I think some of that text that you added is relevant and could be re-added if you could provide an appropriate reference. There are a few articles that discuss Korean Palaeolithic and I don't think I have seen Chonmal Cave or other sites you mentioned -- it would be good to introduce wikireaders to the sites that you mentioned. I didn't mean to discourage you...I hope you can add the text in a better place or in a better article. Mumun 無文 19:53, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- i am exhausted. maybe your write is better. source from [1] Leavepower 20:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- You wrote some interesting things, especially about the Palaeolithic. I think some of that text that you added is relevant and could be re-added if you could provide an appropriate reference. There are a few articles that discuss Korean Palaeolithic and I don't think I have seen Chonmal Cave or other sites you mentioned -- it would be good to introduce wikireaders to the sites that you mentioned. I didn't mean to discourage you...I hope you can add the text in a better place or in a better article. Mumun 無文 19:53, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Your source looks okay to me. Perhaps you could add text from this source in the article Prehistoric Korea? None of the sites from your source are mentioned in that article. It would be a good chance to introduce readers to this information that you have found. What do you think? cheers! Mumun 無文 20:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- Hi again! I appreciate that you are tired and so I went ahead and added some of the material that you introduced in the Palaeolithic section of the Prehistoric Korea article. Please take a look when you are able and tell me what you think Mumun 無文 20:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- ok. i don't care.Leavepower 19:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] August 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Koror-Babeldaob Bridge. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Endroit 20:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Koror-Babeldaob Bridge. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you.--Endroit 21:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Korean Peninsula. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Endroit 08:45, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to User:Replystay, you will be blocked from editing. Do not remove any sockpuppet templates from others' user pages.--Endroit 10:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Karate, you will be blocked from editing. --Endroit 10:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The influence of karate in Korea
The Korean section in the karate article has had a very dynamic history. To delete the entire section on your first visit is not helpful. Could I suggest that you edit individual sentences using [citation needed], [dubious ] or [who?] tags? Even better, if you have references to disprove any statement, please add them. Thanks! jmcw 09:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- The section in the karate article on Korea references the wiki taekwondo article. Please update the taekwondo article rather than delete from the karate article. Thanks! jmcw 10:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- not neutral POV edit. also no citation. first of all taekwondo and karate "root" is diffrence. maybe karate is copycat of taekwondo. thanks. maybe tekkyon -> karate -> taekwondo? Leavepower 10:20, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- I've added some history to the karate article from the taekwondo article to show that taekwondo is an ancient martial art. I think it has better proportion now. jmcw 10:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] User:Totoz
Please tell me why you blanked the sockpuppet tag from this user's page? --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 10:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Endroit and Watermint continually double play (suspected socket puppet), and personal harassment to other id.Leavepower 10:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your AIV report
Thank you for making a report about Endroit (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. – Note: Leaving template message is not prima facie evidence of blockable harrassment. Sandstein 10:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- This message is left to both Endroit and Leavepower. WP:AIV is not a forum to settle your content disputes. Please settle these in accordance with WP:DR. Thanks. Sandstein 10:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- i don't want personal harassment to that guy. (i'm busy) if he continually personal harassment, then plz, block him.Leavepower 10:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Warning removal
I have removed the warnings that were issued here, in your despute with User:Endroit & User:Watermint. May I take this time to strongly suggest that you make no further edits to these articles, with out opening a discussion on the relevant talk pages. As a new user (yesterday), who seems surprsingly very au fait with the working of wikipedia, I would suggest you step back or I, or another admin, will be forced to issue a block and not in the direction that you may wish. If you have any further questions please don't hesitate to get in touch. Regards Khukri 11:39, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
