From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
Article upgrading needed: You can help! |
WP:IA |
Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films
- Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development.
To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met:
- Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.)
- Film infobox ({{infobox film}})
- Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.)
- Plot summary
- Include cast and crew information.
- At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.)
- Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))
Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF
Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
|
|
|
|
[edit] Trivia/John Newton
JJay removed the trivia bit concerning the Jack Newton/John Newton connection on the grounds that there is "no apparent connection"; note that the article on the name John lists "Jack" as a common diminutive form and that the article on the name Jack lists its origin as a nickname for "John" or "Jacob", with the statement "native speakers of English would almost certainly associate the name "Jack" with "John"". The frequency with which the forms are interchanged in English (e.g., a famous person such as John F. Kennedy can just as easily be recognized when referred to as "Jack Kennedy") seems to make this objection moot. Ubernostrum 20:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- With all due respect, your argument seems to me to be a bit of a stretch. Leap of Faith is a film about an evangelical con man. John Newton was an apparently upstanding 18th century clergyman. Frankly, I just don't see any evidence of a connection. In addition, if there is a connection to John Newton, how do you know that it is not to one of the many other John Newtons listed at John Newton (disambiguation)? Or for that matter, why not discuss the real Jack Newton? As much as I like trivia, I don't think the Jack Newton/John Newton info belongs here. --JJay 21:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- While I don't have a source to back it up, the parallel between con man who has a religious experience and quits his ways (the film) and slave trader who has a religious experience and quits his ways (John Newton) seems like a trivia-worthy coincidence regardless of intent. Ubernostrum 22:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well when you put it like that, I guess you could make a connection. It would be better, though, if there was some evidence that the screenwriter choose the name for that reason, because it could just be a coincidence. --JJay 23:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)