Talk:Leander Paes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leander Paes article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Leander Paes has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
June 7, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India.
GA	Quality: GA-Class (add comments)
More information about this article... ??? Importance: not yet rated on the importance scale

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis
GA	Quality: GA
Mid	Importance: Mid
Article Grading:

[edit] GA comment

Inline citations go directly after the punctuation. Fix all occurrences found throughout the article. --Nehrams2020 06:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review

Pass The article comprehensively covers the subject's tennis career, while mentioning relevant tangential information such as birth, parents, and a controversies section. It contains a sufficient quantity of inline citations (although some citations for the "early life" section would be necessary to pass FA review down the road). Grammar appears correct, and prose is adequate, but could use improvement to be more eloquent (again, with FA review in mind). The first four sentences of the section titled "Early Career" are a good example of where better prose is needed. "Leander did 'x'." He rose to 'y'. In 1992 he reached 'z'." Some transitional terms such as "then", "after", "despite", "interestingly" etc... would help the prose be more compelling. Nevertheless, a solid GA-class article.Bradford44 02:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)