Talk:Leaf Candy Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Illinois This article is part of WikiProject Illinois, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Flag
Portal
Leaf Candy Company is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of baseball and baseball-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Oak Leaf

The company Oak Leaf Confections [1] has a historical connection to Leaf. The customer service rep at Oak Leaf told they were part of Leaf "way,way way back", but didn't know anything else. It would be good for the article if we could figure this out. ike9898 19:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't think there was ever any connection between Leaf Brands and Oak Leaf Confections. My grandfater, Sol S. Leaf founded Leaf (named after his own last name) Candy and the logo was never an oak leaf shape. I can ask my father if there is any connection between the two companies, but he might not remember... munko57

[edit] Trading cards

Need much more about Leaf trading cards, and especially, some details of how it got split from the candy business. ike9898 19:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Beatrice

From what I have read, it looks like leaf didn't really aquire Beatrice Foods. Beatrice subject to a hostile buy out by firm that divided it up and sold the pieces (this part is easy to confirm). It looks to me like Leaf acquired a division of Beatrice or maybe just some of its brands. I am having trouble digging up the details on this. ike9898 15:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Info to incorporate

The Overland Candy Company introduced a malted milk candy product called Giants in 1939. In 1947, Overland merged with Chicago Biscuit Company, Leaf Gum and Leaf Machinery. Leaf Brands reintroduced malted milk balls in 1949 under the name of Whoppers. Today they are made by the Hershey Company. Whoppers were first sold unwrapped, two for one cent. After the creation of cellophane wrapping machines, smaller Whoppers were packaged in cellophane and sold five for one cent. These were called "Fivesomes." Soon after, Leaf introduced the first confectionery milk carton package. In the early 70s, different flavors were tried and sometime between 1949 and 1952 an egg-shaped Whopper was introduced for Easter.


Sixlets??

http://www.confectionerynews.com/news/ng.asp?id=14278-sweetworks-acquires-sixlets

has info about Oak Lead and Sixlets

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb041/is_200307/ai_hibm1G1107250094

[edit] Possible Cleanup

After making a lot of changes to the references, I can still see that a majority of this article are text on a list. It looks more like a timeline of actions which have happened in this company, which should be, in my opinion, be written as sentences.

Not only that, but a lot of things seem to be about sepreated issues related to the company's history, and not really mentioning a lot about it's role in candy business. I think there should be some information about Leaf's present role, rather than just having a lot of lines about the history.

There could be other ways on how to make a nice cleanup onto this article. Any ideas? ~IS7 19:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:LEAF Oy Logo.jpg

Image:LEAF Oy Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)