Talk:Leadership ranks of the Sturmabteilung

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	German military history task force
Associated task forces (periods and conflicts):
	World War II task force

[edit] What crap

This article does not discuss day to day jobs, or even a complete listing of ranks. All it discusses is past officers and the uniforms they wore. --69.92.47.74 23:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Undiscussed Merge

I think this merge was a little bit too quick. There was no discussion about it and it has effectively wiped out all category entries on Stabschef and Oberste SA-Fuhrer. It now says "SA Leaders" in Nazi party paramilitary ranks which is not a correct entry. In addition, these two SA ranks are completely separate from one another. How should one fix this? -Husnock 14:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Okay, maybe I was too harsh too quick. I cleaned it up and changed the title. I guess its okay now. -Husnock 15:42, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

The correct term in german would be "Oberster SA-Führer" (if used without an article), or, "Der oberste SA-Führer" with article. "Oberste SA-Führer" would be plural, and i would really wonder if the nazis were in favor of shared leadership. --84.190.37.107 14:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

hey everyone. "Stabschef" is not just a term for a SS rank. it's just the german word for "chief of staff" as well, I think that should be added to the article

hitler oberstrate 1945, is no true, and lutze??

ok and rhom was not a oberste?

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:EarlyRohm.jpg

Image:EarlyRohm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)