User talk:Lbrun12415/Archive 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Contents

[edit] MKW yet again...

Alright. I'm bought but, why are there only 18 characters, and no Miis?SLJCOAAATR 1 (talk) 22:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Can you give me a link to the list? I went to all the cited sources but, they're all the same, and doesn't have any new info...I'm upset about no Wart though...SLJCOAAATR 1 (talk) 22:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I really don't trust a place that can be edited by anyone...Any pics.? Thanks!SLJCOAAATR 1 (talk) 23:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Didn't work befor but, if you find any Skeletol, Rosalina, Funky, etc. Let me know!SLJCOAAATR 1 (talk) 23:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

That's pretty cool. Thanks.SLJCOAAATR 1 (talk) 23:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Verifiability

We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in Mario Kart, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --HeaveTheClay (talk) 23:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please actually click on what I suggested

We are not a fansite. You need to have reliable sources. See the verifiability required on Wikipedia. Do not send me images that are hosted on unsourceable websites. Until then, all the best. --HeaveTheClay (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

 This article needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2008)
Racer Super
Mario Kart		 Mario
Kart 64		 Mario Kart
Super Circuit		 Mario Kart:
Double Dash		 Mario
Kart DS		 Mario
Kart Wii		 Series
Baby Daisy NoN NoN NoN NoN NoN YesY[1] Mario
Baby Luigi NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN YesY Yoshi
Baby Mario NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN YesY[2] Yoshi
Baby Peach NoN NoN NoN NoN NoN YesY[3] Mario
Birdo NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN YesY[4] Mario
Bowser YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY[5] Mario
Bowser Jr. NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN YesY[6] Mario
Daisy NoN NoN NoN YesY YesY YesY Mario
Diddy Kong NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN YesY Donkey Kong
Donkey Kong NoN YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY[7] Donkey Kong
DK Jr. YesY NoN NoN NoN NoN NoN Donkey Kong
Funky Kong NoN NoN NoN NoN NoN YesY Donkey Kong
Dry Bones NoN NoN NoN NoN YesY YesY Mario
King Boo NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN YesY Mario
Koopa Troopa YesY NoN NoN YesY NoN YesY[8] Mario
Luigi YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY[9] Mario
Mario YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY[10] Mario
Mii NoN NoN NoN NoN NoN YesY[11] Wii series/Mii Channel
Paratroopa NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN NoN Mario
Peach YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY[12] Mario
Petey Piranha NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN NoN Mario
R.O.B. NoN NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN Robot/NES accessory
Rosalina NoN NoN NoN NoN NoN YesY Mario
Shy Guy NoN NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN< Mario
Skeletal Bowser NoN NoN NoN NoN NoN YesY[13] Mario
Toad YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY[14] Mario
Toadette NoN NoN NoN YesY NoN YesY Mario
Waluigi NoN NoN NoN YesY YesY YesY[15] Mario
Wario NoN YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY[16] Wario
Yoshi YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY YesY[17] Yoshi

[edit] It's not that I don't believe your information

I know those characters ARE in the game or are out. Since the game is not out officially, you need to have Wikipedia guideline sources. Fans who have copies of the game early, it is not a good source. See Wikipedia guidelines for sources. Again, it is not that I don't think they are in the game or out, it's the nature of this encyclopedia requires good sources. Photobucket, Web forums, etc, aren't acceptable on Wikipedia. All the best.--HeaveTheClay (talk) 02:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Mario Kart Wii, multiple same citations

I took the liberty of adding one single citation for all the unlockable characters, etc. Add 1 to each character (instead of the reference) to link to the N-Europe story. --HeaveTheClay (talk) 18:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

With regard to your comments on The Spectacular Spider-Man (TV series): Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.--CyberGhostface (talk) 23:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spectacular Spider-man, et all

Is it really necessary to call people idiots and morons when you revert changes? Please just revert it without the insults. --64.14.248.62 (talk) 01:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Sonic Unleashed

In that case you'd be better off actually editing the article, which would be faster than coming to my talk page. :) SynergyBlades (talk) 18:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Just thought I'd let you know: some people are putting Holiday 2008 because it says exactly that on the US English site (whereas the Europe site is exactly the same with the exception of the word "Late" where "Holiday" goes - most Europeans don't refer to the Christmas season as Holiday). SynergyBlades (talk) 21:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] On this article...

Unfortunately, the use of Serebii.net as a source violates both WP:NOR and WP:SPS. Wait until the episode is out and all the details are clear before updating the article. -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 00:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

All right, I've gone ahead and brought the article up to date with a little helpful edit from Drakesketchit. When the next episode airs and you want to update the article, try to write and cite it the way MelicansMatkin and I do to avoid violating any rule related to WP:NOR and WP:SPS. -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 13:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Rosalina

Before you start another tirade, let me explain some things:

I did remove Rosalina from the article on 3/28. The reason was that, at the time, everything about her was pretty much given in the plot section of the Galaxy article. Plus, the part about her being in MKWii was (again at the time), speculation and had no credible source. We now know that the latter is true (and can be verified).

I checked the history of the article [[1]] and noticed that:

  • 1. Another user re-added Rosalina on 3/31.
  • 2. Subsequently, someone with an IP address removed her again on 4/8. I had nothing at all to do with that. That's not even the IP address of my PC.
  • 3. I've had nothing to do with the article since 3/28.
  • 4. After you added Rosalina back today, TTN reverted your edit. His reason? It would be best to explain when reverting. Rosalina is still too minor at this point. Wait until she appears in more games.

So what? Is TTN a vandal as well? Because he gave an understandable, concrete reason for his edit like I did?

I'll give my reason again: Rosalina is a minor character. She had one big role. That's it. She also appeared in one spin-off game, that has no bearing whatsoever on the series as a whole. It's not a matter of playability; it's a matter of notability, and Rosalina lacks a good deal of it.

There's a difference between vandalism and removing content that isn't note-worthy. Vandals have no reasons for their actions; they're just jerks. I, however, made that edit in an attempt to better the article. Remember, I said that if anyone found a problem with my edit, feel free to revert it. Hopefully, you can understand this, because I don't have the time to argue over something so trivial. ChromeWulf ZX (talk) 18:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Smash Bros Task Force Barnstar-I meant to give you this a while ago

The Smash Bros Task Force Barnstar
I present this to you for outstanding participation in the task force. Happy Editing and keep up the good job.--Smashbrosboy 18:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

Thanks for the star! J.delanoygabsadds 15:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sonic Unleashed star

Thank you very much.Fairfieldfencer FFF 15:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Moi aussi

Thanks also from me for the star. Let's continue to keep it accurate, sourced, and as free from fancruft as possible, as more info comes in. :) SynergyBlades (talk) 00:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of List of nuclear engineers

A tag has been placed on List of nuclear engineers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KurtRaschke (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Little context in List of nuclear engineers

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of nuclear engineers, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of nuclear engineers is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of nuclear engineers, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Xbox 360

The Elite comes equipped with a 120 gb hard drive, and therefore, you will not require a memory card. It will play original Xbox that are on this list. Hope this helps. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 00:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

120 gigabytes is plenty of space. Yes, it comes with an HDMI cable. See http://www.xbox.com/en-US/hardware/x/xbox360elitesystem/default.htm for the full details. Best, xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 00:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Elena Franklin

A tag has been placed on Elena Franklin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. MHDIV ɪŋglɪʃnɜː(r)d(Suggestion?|wanna chat?) 19:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 120 gb > 256 mb

120 gigabytes is about 120000 megabytes. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 18:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Jamie Lynn Spears, you will be blocked from editing. Metros (talk) 06:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Metros (talk) 20:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove warning messages from your talk page unless you're archiving. They are there for a reason.
Furthermore, I'm surprised at you. You're usually a good editor with constructive edits. I fail to understand why you want to stoop down to vandalizing and personal attacks. I'll be monitoring you for a while, Link. lets hope you don't start vandalizing again Dengarde ► Complaints 20:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
And thats what I mean. You usually make constructive edits, why are you resorting to vandalism and personal attacks? Dengarde ► Complaints 20:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
...I have NO idea what you just said. But don't try to pin this on someone else. You changed Jamie Lynn Spears's occupation from "acrtess" to "hoe"[2]. You told the editors on Spears's talk page to shut up BECAUSE Spears was a "hoe" [3], then editing again saying "no-one cares" [4], which you have no right speaking for the entire world. You're acting very strange, I'm even starting to think that you're not even the owner of this account.Dengarde ► Complaints 20:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
== December 2007 ==

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User talk:Metros, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ScarianCall me Pat 19:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Metros (talk) 19:35, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Metros

your looking at wrong thing


http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl&diff=181037702&oldid=181037546

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl&diff=181038201&oldid=181037702

That is what i was talking about he changed it not once but, twice even after people said to leve it.--DarkFierceDeityLink 19:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

and no i'm not sayind S***y b/c i dont do S)))y's.--DarkFierceDeityLink 19:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Continue your incivility on here and your talk page will be locked. Also, you warned him for edits to Super Smash Bros. (series), not to Super Smash Bros. Brawl. Those are not vandalism, it is a content dispute so no one should be warning anyone about vandalism, especially not as "waste of sperms". Metros (talk) 19:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My talk

I would like to say they way I acted was wrong and I WONT DO IT AGAIN ,Happy New Year and look for the new me in 2008.--DarkFierceDeityLink 02:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Archive

Care to explain why you just archived EveryDayJoe45's talk page? I don't see anywhere where he requested you to do that for him. Metros (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Even though you were trying to be nice please don't archive other people's talk pages. Cheers! Theresa Knott | The otter sank 23:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. I knew you were expecting it to be reverted. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 20:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

There is no way to know until the game comes out. :) Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 20:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You For joining the Task Force

Hey, thank's for joining the SmashBros task force. We appreciate it.--Smashbrosboy (talk) 20:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:NP

Oh, you wrote that? I replied to Tinkleheimer. If you are talking about my userpage, no i will do it. If you are talking about the SmashBros Task Force page sure. Be my guest. Edit that page whenever.--Smashbrosboy (talk) 23:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Smash Edit

Why did you undo my Smash Bros. Task force edit? It would be a good idea to have one.--Smashbrosboy (talk) 18:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Are we allowed to use your practical joke thing? I will remove it from my pages if you say no.--Smashbrosboy (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

[edit] December 23

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:V-Dash may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. MelicansMatkin (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Pokémon Diamond and Pearl. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. MelicansMatkin (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] sorry and thanks

sorry about the edit war and thanks for fixing my page.--DarkFierceDeityLink 18:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

It's no problem; I'm glad that you like the archive box, I've always found it to be pretty useful. MelicansMatkin (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Userpage Cleanup

I made a couple of format and clean-up changes to your userpage; I hope that is okay with you. However, please note that claiming an article or userpage to be protected (even your own) is generally a pretty serious thing to do and not allowed on Wikipedia. MelicansMatkin (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

OK no prob and thanks for the clean up my page looks a lot better, I have a question how do you post pictures on wiki?--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Underneath the Search box on the left-hand side is a toolbox. In there, click the link Upload File. MelicansMatkin (talk) 10:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Suu shenron.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Suu shenron.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Iceclimbers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Iceclimbers.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jamie Lynn Spears, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lcarscad (talk) 05:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Jamie Lynn Spears, you will be blocked from editing. Metros (talk) 06:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Metros (talk) 20:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove warning messages from your talk page unless you're archiving. They are there for a reason.
Furthermore, I'm surprised at you. You're usually a good editor with constructive edits. I fail to understand why you want to stoop down to vandalizing and personal attacks. I'll be monitoring you for a while, Link. lets hope you don't start vandalizing again Dengarde ► Complaints 20:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
And thats what I mean. You usually make constructive edits, why are you resorting to vandalism and personal attacks? Dengarde ► Complaints 20:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
...I have NO idea what you just said. But don't try to pin this on someone else. You changed Jamie Lynn Spears's occupation from "acrtess" to "hoe"[5]. You told the editors on Spears's talk page to shut up BECAUSE Spears was a "hoe" [6], then editing again saying "no-one cares" [7], which you have no right speaking for the entire world. You're acting very strange, I'm even starting to think that you're not even the owner of this account.Dengarde ► Complaints 20:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sega Newsletter

[edit] Way out of line

"What the hell is wrong with you did you dad rape your ass or something?"[8]

Dealing with vandalism can be stressful, but that's no excuse for using such a blatantly offensive edit summary. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Response.

All of them? Are you saying that every single list of video games based on console only covers those three? Are you saying if I go to the Featured List Wikipedia page, there won't be a list of games that acknowledges Australia? Or are you saying that the only ones that matter are those that defend your point? - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Wow, silly me - I was so dumb! I totally forgot that there are only five video game consoles in the history of the industry. No N64, Atari, NES, SNES, PSX, anything else - ONLY those. And I forgot that the ideal quality of articles is Start, which all of those are.

Will you please explain to me why it is stupid to say "worse articles are worse than better articles"? You cite many Start articles. If all lists of video games by console supported your argument, and the one list left - the featured list - supported mine, you would, by default, have a worse argument. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Do you have one single Wikipedia policy or guideline that even implies being old means that it shouldn't be emulated?
Are you saying that if Pong were a featured article, it shouldn't be used as an example of a quality article more than a terrible article on a game that came out today? The only thing that matters is the QUALITY of an article. Being a Featured list means it is an "example of the highest quality on Wikipedia". Why shouldn't we emulate the highest qualtiy on Wikipedia? - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Response.

Check out Snowboard Kids 2 on N64's page. Are you familiar with the flag? Probably not, so... It's Australia's.
And of course, I bet you don't want to bring up video game articles, which are supposed to include Australia if there is a date provided for it.
The fact that all of your examples calls the region that the games are released in as Europe, even though the release date covers South Africa, a non-European, predominantly white region, shows that what they do hardly sets precedence. You're basically saying that ignorance is allowed because everyone else is being ignorant. Are you saying that these lists are edited from an objective POV? It is very rare to find any editors from the United States in the gaming spectrum who aren't biased towards a US perspective, and I doubt that all these lists are overflowing with them.
There is no guideline that ever suggests that an article should emulate a Start-class article. Is there also a reason provided why the third-biggest English speaking country (behind US and Canada) is not relevant? - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Response.

Um, so, you're saying that because Australia is not as relevant, it shouldn't be removed? I guess being the least relevant is all that matters. We'll just ignore the fact that the least relevant is not necessarily irrelevant.

Europe gets games so much slower than Japan and North America, I'd really love to see a single reason to remove Australia that doesn't apply to Europe as well. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

And Australia got Trace Memory several months before North America. But of course, THAT doesn't matter, right? It's just some silly little exception. Until, of course, I find dozens upon dozens of additional examples. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Response.

  1. I do believe you went to an administrator, and asked Alison to help you because I was "ruining List of Nintendo wii[sic] games" and "only personally attacking you". I can't imagine that a friendly chat was what you had in mind when you wanted her to help you. - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Don't worry too much

I've locked horns with people like this before, and his trolling is proof enough that he's the one out of line. I appreciate that you're trying to help me out, and you were right to approach an admin. Don't let someone tell you down when you want a peaceful solution. Because here on Wikipedia it's going to happen.. a lot. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 06:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh, my bad. I didn't realize calling them stupid and patronizing them by claiming the ire over Australia being absent from the article was "Wanting a peaceful resolution". But I guess when you have your dream goggles on, you can make any situation out to be a mirror opposite, eh? - A Link to the Past (talk) 06:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
You just made no sense, get some sleep dude even your insults are confusing now.
Lbrun, please don't use my talk page as a proxy to talk to someone else :P --AeronPrometheus (talk) 06:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
It's okay, this whole thing is going to give me something to laugh at in the morning. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 06:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, let me tone it down - you claimed he was interested in a "peaceful solution". I pointed out that he was antagonistic from the very beginning. Is that not clear enough for you? Someone who is not peaceful =/= someone who wants a peaceful solution? - A Link to the Past (talk) 06:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
And if you'll actually bother to observe, the tension ONLY started when the user, Lbrun, made accusations against me. I'm not taking responsibility for the antagonism that he created. - A Link to the Past (talk) 06:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding GameFAQs and Iron man

When you first said you added false information on GamFAQs here, I wasn't particularly interested. But now that I think of it, it's better to attempt to fix that as well while I'm around. Which version of Iron man did you submit information on, and exactly what information was falsified? Chan Yin Keen | Talk 13:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry mate, can't read that. I assume that it's specific to your account, so you're just gonna have to say what you wrote so I can crosscheck it with other sources and see if I can contribute to GameFAQs and rectify. Chan Yin Keen | Talk 15:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Yeah noticed it wasn't there. At least they check through it every now and then. All good. Chan Yin Keen | Talk 15:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Response.

Yeah, great argument - "because these guys do it, I'm allowed to do it". I guess I should vandalize the article, since much of Wikipedia has been vandalized.

And I live in Minnesota. Nice guess. But even if I did, it wouldn't matter. I would be annoyed at the blatant ignorance of silly Americans - not naming names, besides yours - thinking that Australia, one of the biggest English-speaking regions in the world, and one of the biggest gaming regions in the world (with only North America, Europe, Japan, and South Korea being bigger, and the latter is only bigger because of the PC community). If you don't include Australia and Canada (which does often have its own release date, if you'll observe), the inclusion of release dates is not appropriate. The content is not of use to millions of people, and instead of making it of use, you brush them off as irrelevant.

The only question is "is Australia big enough?" And the answer is yes. If you object, the answer is "be quiet". - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Response.

All of them? Are you saying that every single list of video games based on console only covers those three? Are you saying if I go to the Featured List Wikipedia page, there won't be a list of games that acknowledges Australia? Or are you saying that the only ones that matter are those that defend your point? - A Link to the Past (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] You don't seem to understand Wikipedia policy.

You cannot alter my comment in any way. You are not allowed to slash out any comment I made no more than I am allowed to slash out every comment you've made. You don't seem to understand that - and I attribute this to poor grasp of policy. An editor is not allowed to alter another editor's comment. By edit warring with me over the content in my comment, regardless of your intention, it is vandalism. I do not wish for you to alter my post, so if you continue to do so, I will report you for doing so. This is not a threat, this is a warning. All I care about is getting you to learn that you're not allowed to do that, ever. You may get people more temperamental than myself if you don't watch yourself. - A Link to the Past (talk) 23:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

So since you do not intend on following Wikipedia policy on editing other users' comments and refuse to do so, I'm going to take it upon myself to have you blocked from Wikipedia the next time you make any attempt at editing a comment of mine. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Just a note -- yes, if you delete others' article talk page comments, you will be blocked. Please cease this behavior immediately. Thank you, Andre (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Do not delete comments from my talk page

I don't know what is going on yet, but despite my slow connection, I plan on looking in to it. That said, do not delete any more comments (esp. on my talk page) if you delete anything else (comment-wise) you'll find yourself on the wrong end of a block for disruption. Btw, using "troll" in this case (in the edit summary) was also a personal attack, I'd advise against that as well. R. Baley (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

And I'm tired of arguing with you, Lbrun. All I care about is the future of the List of Wii games. However, so long as you keep attempting to archive the ongoing discussion or alter my post in any way, I will keep on. It's your choice what you want to do - do you want to keep on, leading to a block, or do you want to end this endless discussion and both users can go on with themselves? - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Admin response

Just a note -- yes, if you delete others' article talk page comments, you will be blocked. Please cease this behavior immediately. Thank you, Andre (talk) 00:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Do not delete comments from my talk page

I don't know what is going on yet, but despite my slow connection, I plan on looking in to it. That said, do not delete any more comments (esp. on my talk page) if you delete anything else (comment-wise) you'll find yourself on the wrong end of a block for disruption. Btw, using "troll" in this case (in the edit summary) was also a personal attack, I'd advise against that as well. R. Baley (talk) 00:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Replied at my talk page. . .

Hi Lbrun, I have replied to your comments here and here at this section of my talk page. R. Baley (talk) 02:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ssbbwolfroster.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ssbbwolfroster.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Inappropriate edit summaries, again

Please do not stoop to the level of the vandals when dealing with them. Edit summaries like this one are completely inappropriate. This clearly breaches WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. If yopu cannot act better than the vandals you will be treated like one and blocked. You have been warned about this behavior before. Please take this warning seriously. If you continue to insult and belittle people, yes even vandals, you will get yourself into trouble. Please do revert vandalism, but do it without insulting them. Thanks, Gwernol 05:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)