User talk:Lazarus89
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] Economic war edits
You are of course correct on the Anglo-Irish Trade War matter but what about providing some verifiable sources per the citation policy. If you start out doing that for your edits you will make a great editor. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 19:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks man, I will do.... i'm getting to grips with all the mecahnics of editing and so-on and then I will cite my sources Lazarus89 (talk) 01:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding your message.
First of all, do not state or imply that I am stupid, simply because you disagree with my edits. You failed to cite any sources in your edits to the Michael Collins article, and that is why I reverted your edits. I stand by my reversion. I suggest you assume good faith in future. Thank you. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 02:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I accept and absolutely support citing material, it's the correct way to add to articles but i don't accept I need to cite sources for blatantly obvious and indisputable facts. For example Frongoch internment camp IS\WAS in Wales, who must I cite for that? Equally the Sun IS hot, I don't think I need to cite any sources to support that statement, it's a generally accepted fact Q.E.D Lazarus89 (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Éamon de Valera sources
I reply where the discussion starts, in this case at my talk page. ww2censor (talk) 02:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)