User talk:LAX/Archive 6

Survivor Series (1991)

Hello, a very very minor change you just made was a point of serious contention a few days ago. You might want to read this short thread. I undid your change to avoid confusion, please let us know what you think. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 15:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikibreak

I will be on Wikibreak from this sunday until the following saturday. I'll be away on vacation. What needs to be done in the next day or two that I can complete. iMatthew 2008 21:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I will. But I'll be on as much as I can be between now and when I leave. Also, I think that we should clear the active members list and re-start it (for WP:PW). So that we can have it updated. iMatthew 2008 21:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Cross-posted to other Kliq members

I will be on vacation in real life from February 17, 2008 until February 24, 2008 because I don't have school, and am going away. Take care while I'm gone. Cheers! -- iMatthew 2008

Adios. iMatthew 2008 21:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Professional Wrestling Barnstar
		For all of your hard work on expanding PPV articles. iMatthew 2008 02:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

You deserve it! iMatthew 2008 02:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Nobody's work goes un-noticed. Everyone should be rewarded for a job well done. iMatthew 2008 03:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

OTE

Hey whats up, check out Over the Edge (1998) does it look good so far?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok I fixed the 6 man tag team match, is that better?TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Well I went over it, I didn't see any other present tenses. Like what words did you see that signify present tense, and then I will correct them?TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

but it's used in past tense, like its supported with other words in past tense, but ok i'll fix it.TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Anywho, Im done the article. Any concerns you can list on the Peer review.TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry.

Wasn't trying to cause trouble.

Sorry, won't happen again.

Vjmlhds February 17, 2008 00:14 (UTC)

Just a difference of opinion that has been smoothed over.

No more problems, I promise.

Vjmlhds February 17, 2008 00:19 (UTC)

This user has just reverted another edit on the page (without and edit summary). iMatthew 2008 00:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

He added the "Occasional Wrestlers" section before, then I reverted that edit, as I think it is unnecessary. He then reverted my edit back to his, after you warned him not to revert again. iMatthew 2008 00:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Gracias. iMatthew 2008 01:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Update: She/He just reverted your edit at WWE Roster. iMatthew 2008 01:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok. iMatthew 2008 02:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

ECW

Sabu was in WCW (Halloween Havoc 95) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.229.75 (talk) 23:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

WCW

My wikipedia gimmick is a hired gun for WCW articles. Armed with much knowledge and dedication, I am ready to help with the expansion of the legacy of World Championship Wrestling! EWC Champion (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Royal Rumble

Alright, I won't add it then. What other feuds should I cover? And yeah, add the Kurt Angle image to the Rumble, since it did took place in 2001. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Will do. ;) And, the Rumble looks good, very good detail. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I know. How 'bout Vengeace '05; how does that look so far? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I didn't add that, Truco did. But, I'll fix it. Thanks for the feedback, Kliq member. P.S. Are you watching No Way Out? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I was. Sorry if I didn't respond sooner, but I was trying to hide from the party and log into Wikipedia, but I was caught. Are you still working on the feuds for SummerSlam '04? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

No, I was just asking. You can work on the Rumble and then work on SummerSlam. Remember, don't make SummerSlam your priority. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you need help on it? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

For Backlash or the Royal Rumble? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I would say the Women's title match, I'm pretty sure that Chyna and Ivory had a feud. If not, then I guess you have your feuds. But, that's just me. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Like I said, that's just me. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

OMG, I know, I was gonna mention it to you, but I didn't want to start problems and all. I guess "copy and paste" does work. ;) Luckily, he didn't copy and paste mine or your page to his. But whatever. Hey, I think adding the feud between Kane and Matt Hardy for SummerSlam is notable. Opinion? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, like he "helped". Anyways, according to Online World of Wrestling, the night after SummerSlam, Matt helped Edge retain the IC title against Kane and weeks later he tried to stop the wedding between Kane and Lita. Do you think it might work? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

No, for the Aftermath. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. ;) How's the Rumble '01 going? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Are you slacking off? Just kidding. ;) Are you stuck on something or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Wait.... did you mean that in a good way or bad way? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Its cool man. ;) I've been slacking too with the Rumble '97, SummerSlam and Vengeance '05. I guess we all have those days that we don't want to do anything. You know what I mean? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, Kliq member. ;) Like that Hannah Montana song says, everyone has those days. Hey, can I run something through you? 00:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThinkBlue (talk • contribs)

Does this make sense? ----> The feud between Edge and Kane seemingly came to an end, as Edge was put in an program with Matt Hardy. On the July 11 edition of Raw, Hardy made a surprising appearance, as interfered in a match between Edge and Kane. The following week, as both Edge and Lita were walking towards the ring, as Edge was scheduled to face Kane in a Steel Cage match, Hardy attacked Edge from behind. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Really? P.S. This is for Vengeance. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, that works. Should it be mentioned that Matt was released from the WWE? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Hey, did you try to revert the edit from Chris Benoit's page? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, at 00:53, you warned Jamesrock2005 for his edit test on Chris Benoit, but the guy's edit is still on the article's history. Is the system down or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, well I was just wondering. Hey, do you think you can update the Vengeance link. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, that's if you have time. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I would really appreciate it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll be waiting to hear from you. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, Cimmo took Backlash '05. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, we took SummerSlam '04 from him and I took Unforgiven '03. He says he's going to create Backlash in his "sandbox", even though he created the article. If he doesn't finish it, I'll take it or do you want to take it? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool, then. Later in the day, I'll get to the Event for SummerSlam. Right now, I got to read a whole lot of stuff for Unforgiven, too many feuds, apparently. Hey, do you think when your done with the Rumble, you can help me with the Event for Unforgiven? That's when your done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. My computer crashed. OMG, he doesn't make sense. Why does he create the article and then put in back in the main page? OMG, he removed the "under construction" template from Unforgiven. Do you think you can talk to him? Anyways. Awesome, after I'm done with the feuds, I'll let you know. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, if he ignores the warnings, doesn't that qualify him for a block? Anyways, just start on the first three matches. I don't want to stress you out. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure, as long as you give me a couple of minutes to work on the Event for SS. Yeah, I got you. Ugg, do I have to revert my edits again? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll leave it for now. But, I will ask for a second opinion. Question: Do I add that the first match, for SS, was a six-man tag team match or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Will do. So, what's happening on SD!? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Interesting. Hey, do you think I should "fix" my page? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I know about the boxes. I've removed some, but, when I continue removing them, the table box (the boxes I created), seems to get messed up. Yeah, I've seen his page. Its cool, but I did like the other design. Do you like his page? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I guess he wanted change. Change is good. ;) Do you want to work on another PPV, after we get done with SS? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

IDK. Basically all the PPV's that I've wanted to expand have either gotten expanded or I've gotten them. Do you have one in mind? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Umm, I'll help work on WrestleMania X-8. As long as I can get one feud. HBK and Orton? Go for it. I really didn't want to touch that one. Since he lost the match. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Then, I'll see you tomorrow. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm down. And, did Tech apologize to you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, then. I hope he can work on Vengeance '03, since he did offer to work on an article. Yes sir. I will not edit Unforgiven. Just tell me when I can. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, should I mention that Edge was booed in Canada? (for SummerSlam) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay. But, does that mean that I have to remove the info. about Cena getting booed at Unforgiven '06? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:40, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the know. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No worries and I'm sorry its taking me so long with SummerSlam. Here's your "Slammy":

		The Original Barnstar
		For making Unforgiven (2003) sound better and spending time on it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome, Kliq (you know the story). Cool, join me and let's be finished with SummerSlam. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Great. I want to finish Unforgiven and SummerSlam. So... let's rock and roll this thing. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I was called in to work to fill-in a shift. Umm, I guess the Angle and Guerrero feud, since I've read that Angle "tried" to unlace Guerrero's boot at WMXX. That's it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I thought you were talking about the "third" feud. Yeah, add the JBL and 'Taker feud. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

IDK. Apparently, Triple H "invited" Eugene into Evolution, but turned on him. I would say maybe. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. I'm in the process of finishing the Event for SummerSlam. Do you think we might finish SS today? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

If you need help on Backlash, you know I can help. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Alrighty, then. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Was the "Dodgeball" thing a match at SS? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I won't then. Hey, I think we should work on Survivor Series '06, after WrestleMania 2000. Thoughts? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool then. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Go with Unforgiven. Also, there's another dispute at the PW page over the weight and height settings. Thought you might be interested. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I don't want you working on all the feuds, but if you give me some pointers for the Kane and Shane McMahon feud, then I'll take that. Is that cool? Oh, I guess this is TJ's "evil" side when it comes to things like that. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Its fine. But, is "loose" the right lose? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, apparently I did the same with SS. I'll fix it. ;) Remember, everyone makes mistakes. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, can you have a talk with Nyfan475, he seriously isn't listening to the warnings left on his talk page. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. I thought I led you know. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

No. Are you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Yup. And Orton even interfered in a WrestleMania 19 rematch between Y2J and Shawn. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Rent the DVD. ;) But, the interference was in July and Bad Blood was in June. Question: Did I set up Tiptoety's Admin page right? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

hi

hi dude Baseball16 (talk) 02:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

      I'm just bored, thats all. Baseball16 (talk) 13:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

I'm not sure if this is the right place to do so, but since you're an administrator (and since you're a friend), I was wondering if I could get the rollback feature. I'll probably continue to use Twinkle to fight vandalism (should that happen anytime soon; I feel rather laid back from editing Wikipedia right now), but I'd still like to see how the official rollback function feels, compared to Twinkle. Cheers, The Chronic 06:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

You're right: the admin rollback is much faster than the Twinkle rollback. Thanks for enabling it for me. The Chronic 16:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

PPV

I just wanna know. What's your favorite PPV? Baseball16 (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Wrestlemania 22.I have it on DVD. Baseball16 (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

You blocked me too quickly.

While I understood why you blocked me, let me explain why I did what I did.

On the TNA roster page, all of the announcers, mangaers, occasionals, etc. are all divided up into their own groups, I was just trying to match it up with the WWE page so they're both uniform, that's all.

No malice or edit warring intended.

vjmlhds February 18 2008 17:21 (UTC)

I probably went about it the wrong way, I took my punishment, and I'd like a chance to speak my peace cordially.

On the topic at hand, as I was saying, I was trying to match up the structure of the WWE roster page with that of TNA, where roles are more specifically defined, rather than everybody being thrown into a big schmozz under "other talent".

Nothing more than that.

Vjmlhds February 18, 2008 18:07 (UTC)

I thought I did discuss it with you by pointing out what my intentions were, and why I did what I did.

Vjmlhds February 18, 2008 23:01 (UTC)

Ah.

OK, fair enough.

Vjmlhds February 18, 2008 23:05 (UTC)

Point taken, advice welcome, see WWE roster talk page.

Vjmlhds February 18, 2008 23:19 (UTC)

Re:Royal Rumble (2001)

IT looks great! Good job, keep up the good work. --TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Yep and that was my honest opinion. One thing I forgot to mention, is try cutting down the "play by play" of each match, cuz I think the E&C/DB match is a wee bit to long. (IMO)--TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. BUt other than that ur doin alright.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks great. It's better, just one thing I have to tell you that Gavyn told me was that when we say thus winning the _____ he says its not grammatically correct as we are writing in past tense, so he said thus ___ won the ____.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok, then. Also how does OTE 1998 look?TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I ask you this cuz last time you said it had problems, but i fixed them. Especially with the tenses.TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok, cool. Also do you think NWO 04 has a chance of becoming an FA? Or would it need more info/sourcing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 22:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

So what could I do now, to ensure that it may be able to pass its FAReview?TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Its ok.TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok. cool thanks.TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Backlash

Its no problem at all, I too would like to apologize for not working on it either, as I am currently busy. I don't like pressuring people when it comes to what needs to be done. But, if you want to finish Backlash, then I don't see it as a problem. Zenlax ^{T C S} 19:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

That's fine by me. Give me a couple of minutes and I'll start working on the event. And thanks for understanding. Zenlax ^{T C S} 19:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Can I get your thoughts on Vengeance. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Excellent work my friend. It can probably attribute itself a Good Article, when all is set and done. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Good to hear. After we're done with Backlash, let's see if the article can become a Good Article. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Agreed upon. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm almost done with the event, afterwards, what would you like for me to work on? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Its no problem at all. I know that you are an Administrator and your duties call upon you to help out Wikipedia and I understand that. Whenever you have the time to complete the background, I'll know you had Backlash in thought. Its no problem at all. :) Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Its no problem. Though, I have lied, as I have not finished the event section. I guess we're even. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Rollback

Thanks, LAX. I appreciate being recognized. :) You can also add me to the list of "users you're cool with" on your user page, if you like. I've never had a problem with you. I'll do my best to use the function as well as I can. I have TWINKLE for Firefox, but this will enable me to rollback on IE too, which is wonderful. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:AFC Backlog Drive

WikiProject Articles for creation needs your help!

WikiProject Articles for creation has done a tremendous job in working at WP:AFC over the past 7½ months. Thank you all for your hard work and dedication! Together, we've made the submission process easier and more streamlined, developed tools to make the process go faster for reviewers, and cut the backlog down to a mere fraction of what it once was. Well done! As you all are aware, however, our work is not quite yet done. The project still has 10 archive pages left to complete, which include over half a month's worth of submissions, many of which have not been completely reviewed. We need your help to finish looking over these neglected submissions so that we can finally remove the backlog notice from the page, and put an end to the more than two year old backlog that has been a thorn in our side for ages! Participants will receive an AFC Barnstar, so hurry up and help out while there's still work to be done! Make sure to sign in on the WikiProject's talk page so we know who is involved in what promises to be our final effort to complete this goal. Thank you for all your help! - Happy editing as always, Hersfold (t/a/c) 16:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this letter because you are listed as a participant in the Articles for creation WikiProject at WP:WPAFC. To avoid receiving further notices, please remove your name from the list. Thanks!

Cimmo

Yep, he just copied and pasted it. He even kept in the userboxes saying he is 21 and from New York (even though he says he is 13 and from Australia). I have asked him to change it, and left a message at WP:USERPAGE asking what I should do if he refuses (some of those are service awards, he had nothing to do with getting Wii up to FA status). TJ Spyke 01:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

New user

Since you are an admin, maybe you might know more. Is it appropriate for a user to redirect their user page to an article and their talkpage to that articles talkpage? This new user (User:Edgebelow) has redirected their userpage to XX Wrestling and their talkpage to Talk:XX Wrestling. TJ Spyke 05:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I just checked the edit logs, and it appears the user is trying to use them as a userpage/user talkpage. Maybe an adminlike you would be able to help him out. TJ Spyke 05:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WrestleMania XIX

Oh no thats great, thanks for your help. But where exactly did you get the info from??--TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

IF you can, I would really appreciate it. =)--TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, no problem take your time.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

WEll, I dont really care. So to avoid conflict, I'll just go with the first example, w/o the year.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 04:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh no problem, I want to finish WMXIX today, becuz I didnt have school due to the weather so yeah. Do you want to tag team and help me expand WMXIX?TrUCo⁹31¹ 20:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

WOOO! Truco and LAX tag team once again. Im going to finish the event section, would you like to cover one more feud for RAW and SD or the aftermath?TrUCo⁹31¹ 20:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Thats way fine by me. Also, in the lead paragraph of the article there is some trivial stuff like this WM is the first in the state of Washington, and Limp Biskit performing 'Takers theme, should that be removed?TrUCo⁹31¹ 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright I will see if I can search for sources for the lead paragraph, after I finish the event section. Also dont hesitate to ask me for help on the aftermath/BG..--TrUCo⁹31¹ 20:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. While you finish the BG, Ill start the AM and then you can finish it, is that cool?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 20:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

GRRRREAT. I'm almost done the event section, just need the two final matches.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 20:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok Im done the event section now. Ill start the AM section now.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

It's ok, perfection takes time..=)--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

This article will have so many sources, lol--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks great, now just one more for the RAW brand and thats it. Im done with the AM of Lesnar/Angle.TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

IMO I think you should do Booker/HHH since it was for a world title. But its your choice.TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, Im done the SD! aftermath, can you do the RAW aftermath?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Yep =)--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Also could this image be uploaded? [1]TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The Slammy Awards, or mayby this image [2]--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The first one, but if you do. Will it get deleted like the owen hart one did?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok, but this one has a copyright by WWE right?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok, thanks so much. You're a great help. I am also sourcing the slammy article. So how do you think the WMXIX event section looks?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure. No Problem.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		I, Truco, award this barnstar to LAX for his work on uploading images. Thank you. TrUCo9311 00:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, you deserve it.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey how does the Slammy Awards article look like now (Ive sourced the entire thing, and made major edits.)?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:59, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks man. --TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Well According to this, Vince's attorneys called HOgan to tell him that he wanted the 'Mania match to be a Street fight. Also check out the expansion of the Brand Extension.TrUCo⁹31¹ 14:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

OH wait, my bad This is where the expansion is at. Also great job with the BG, just need the AM and we should be done.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, just one thing about the draft. Is there a better way I could format it with out putting RAW/SD every time? --TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Im talking about the table..--TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I will go do that. Whats up with the comment all the way down there?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ohh, my talk page has been vandalized twice by the same user. *sigh*, oh now go check out the table, does it look good, and is the description of the fonts good enough or should I reword it?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok I will, also is WMXIX done?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 16:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 17:08, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Background

Would you like for me to work on the background section for Backlash? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Its no problem at all. I happen to enjoy working on the feuds more than anything. Like I've said, your a busy individual, just like me, who forgets one task and works on another. Don't worry, we will make sure that Backlash gets finished. :) Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't discredit yourself from the expansion. I would hate for you to do that. Just, try to help with anything that Backlash needs help on. PLEASE, don't discredit yourself. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Then we have a deal. :) The only reason I brought up Backlash, was that Blue wants to expand another article, and before anything else happens, I wanted to get Backlash done, before moving on to another project. That's why. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

The Curry Man cannot measure up to the TRUE hot and spicy one!

There was once a floundering user. He had a friend. That friend would stick with him, until the end. The floundering user decided to retire. And his friend, though brokenhearted, moved on. In fact that friend would surprise me and become an admin. That friend became a even more respected user. With all his other friends, he formed the "Kliq", a rag-tag group of users who buddied up, and improved professional wrestling articles. Meanwhile, the retiree constantly checked up, and found that he missed his friends. He found that vandalizing their user pages during his final days was a bitter end. As time passed, he really desired that camaradrie gain. He didn't think it was possible for them to like him again. then again, he thought his life getting straightened up was impossible. Boy was that thought wrong. After much pondering, he made the decision to return. Yes he had claimed that he'd retired forever, but Terry Funk claims that all the time. He's still wrestling. And that floundering user smiled, and said, "What if I returned, better than ever? What if I came back and improved everything?" Using that thought, he did what no one ever thought he would do. Come back. With my coming back here, I know you guys will do one of two things: 1. Welcome back! Sure you can be my friend again, just don't pull that shit again, ok? 2. Why did you come back, faggot? We never liked you in the first place! You don't deserve to be here, be gone! And never, EVER come back again! I have a hunch you will do #1. Here's hoping my feeling is correct. And please remember, I am hotter and spiceier than the curry man can ever DREAM of being. Well, sayonarra. And please choose #1. Because if you choose #2, I'll come back anyways. Things are THAT good for me right now. Tech43 (talk) 06:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm happy you forgave me. Do you have anything you need help with concerning Wrestlemania 2000? It's my favorite PPV of all time. I would love to see if it needs any expanding. Tech43 (talk) 20:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I read the Manual of Style, and the sources you guys used, really made me happy. I routinely visit some sites like Onlineworldofwrestling.com. I love some of those sites, and that will make me very comfortable. I also wondered, when was the Raw steel cage match between Eugene and Triple H in 2004? Because you guys might want to add that in the aftermath of SummerSlam (2004) if you haven't done so already. Tech43 (talk) 20:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Anything but the aftermath. I bought the Wrestlemania Anthology 2 months ago, and I watched it 3 times. I think the event needs a little work. So does the Background. Tech43 (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

yes, wrestlemania 2000. Tech43 (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I meant that a little more info needs to be put. For instance, Pro Wrestling Illustrated voted the ladder match beteween the Dudleyz, Hardyz, and Edge & Christian, Match of the year. I also feel that background info, like Big Bossman introducing Bull Buchanan needs to be put in as well. These are all suggetsions, and until the work begins, fusses by me shall NOT be tolerated. In fact, I'm low blowing myself now! Ok, I'm joking, but still, they're suggestions, nothing more, nothing less. And I use too many commas:)!(,) Tech43 (talk) 07:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: WrestleMania X8

Damn, I had no idea you guys were planning on working on the article. I'm so sorry, I guess I was too much anxious after getting X-Seven finished. If you guys still want to work on the article, be my guest. I'm more than welcome to any help possible. Again, I apoligise for this. -- Oakster  Talk  17:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey now look at the brand extension is it good enough to publish?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 05:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm Back

How's it going? iMatthew 2008 15:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

It was great. I went to Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida with my family. I had a great time. Anyway, now that I'm back, I'm going to get back on track with the PPV's. Do you need any help today with SummerSlam 04? I also requested and was granted permission to use the rollback feature this morning. iMatthew 2008 15:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok (as for rollback). Sure, I'll help with WM 2000. Can I have the event? iMatthew 2008 15:29, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, and if it's not too much trouble, can you go to WT:PW and give your opinion in the new discussion I added about the List of WWE Alumni. iMatthew 2008 15:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

If I can get a decision about the WWE Alumni page, I could have it done tonight. iMatthew 2008 17:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Both Truco and Myself believe that we should quietly remove S-Pac from "The Kliq". He has not done anything yet, and we believe he might be one of those users who only comes on every so-often. Please read the discussions on mine and Truco's talk pages. What do you think? iMatthew 2008 20:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok. iMatthew 2008 20:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

New

Okay, I thought I did something wrong. Alright, did you watch Raw in 2003? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

No. The only reason I asked was because I wanted some info. for the Shane and Kane feud. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I guess I'll do that. Anyways, Matt has agreed to work on the Event for Unforgiven. Is that cool? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Go for it. I got the Shane and Kane feud, we both had the Triple H and Goldberg feud and you have the HBK and Orton feud. Which has made us even. Do you think we can get it to GA status? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I know me too. Hey, might this help for the HBK and Orton feud? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Oops, sorry. I'll start working on the feud in my sandbox. Give me the word when I can put in the Background. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

That's no problem with me. Also, it would be pretty cool if this passed GA. iMatthew 2008 00:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll be waiting. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, and what should we do with the S-Pac situation. Blue said she is neutral about it. Truco, me and you say we should let him go, and Zenlax hasn't responded. iMatthew 2008 00:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you think I can publish the 2005 WWE DraftTrUCo⁹31¹ 02:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. I think you should some of this. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok done 2005 WWE Draft, now all that's left is the 2004 one.TrUCo⁹31¹ 02:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

How does my feud look? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. ;) Its always good to use responses in situations like those. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm down. Afterwards, we can work on Armageddon '05. Your thoughts? P.S. How does the feud look? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

You mean by removing Weeks before the booked matches at SummerSlam? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Nope. ;) Can you make the change? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, Kane tombstoned Linda McMahon and Shane "attacked" Kane the week after. And, Kane helped Bischoff get a win over Shane. It says here. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:41, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Then night after SummerSlam, Shane superkicked Kane, who fell into a dumpster covered in flames and the week before Unforgiven, Shane hit a Leap of Faith on Kane. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh. Then, my bad. ;) So, do I remove the other info.? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I would appreciate if you fixed it. ;) My hands hurt. And, I'm sorry if I make you do stuff that I'm suppose to do. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For being so calm about re-writing the feud I was suppose to do. I like to give you the Random Acts of Kindness, for "replacing" my "wording". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

P.S. I think today is my slacking off day. Sorry. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad I bring a smile to your face. ;) I guess I can work on the Aftermath for Unforgiven. When do you want to work on Armageddon? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Works for me. Would it be "laziness" if I copy and edit the Survivor Series '03 feud into the Unforgiven aftermath? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:36, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Guess what Cimmo did. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I think he should be blocked, since he doesn't listen to the warnings. Anyways, I won't copy and paste Survivor Series '03 into Unforgiven. I only brought it up, since I was a little bored yesterday. But, I will try to summarize it and see how it turns out. And its cool with Bad Blood and stuff. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Its cool. ;) As long as you fixed something yesterday, its fine. I would like to apologize for making you work on the feud. Since, I was "suppose" to work on it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:01, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Kliq member. I owe you one. Okay, Matt is going to work on the Event for Unforgiven, which gives you the last part for the Shane and Kane feud, which leaves me for the Aftermath, in which I'll finish. I think we might finish Unforgiven.... today. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Awesome. ;) If we do get it to be a GA candidate, you would have to nominate it, since I nominated Unforgiven '04. Let's rock-and-roll this thing. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't see any problems why you wouldn't fit as a Bureau. Would you like an "endorsement"? Can you see me as an Admin? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. So, in 6 months can I "endorse" you? Anyways, yeah it made sense. I guess that will jump out the window. Umm, yeah it makes sense of Shane's return. Are you willing to go by "SexyLAX"? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, then. Tell me and I'll give my endorsement. Your sig..... looks good. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Its everywhere. Is Matt working on Unforgiven? --  SexyBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I'm watching the Democrat debate. Anyways, Matt wrote the "Event". Thoughts? Oh, is this funny or what? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. And, I'll see what I can do with the Aftermath. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Yup. I really wanted to finish Unforgiven today. Oh well. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Tomorrow, then. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Great job. ;) I'll work on the Aftermath.... right now. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure. Who gets what? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Go you three need an "event writer" for this? Or it is covered? Sexy iMatthew 2008 02:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool. Then we'll "Break it Down". ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Ummm, it didn't make my sig look good. Since the rectangle is little, since it says "Sexy Blue". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I guess, it was fun for one day. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't be negative. We are sexy. ;) No one's better than the Kliq. OMG, I sound like Evolution. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

How does the Aftermath look so far? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I think it would be a great idea. Let's tell the other Kliq members. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

When have I ever disagreed with you? ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you help out with the Shane and Kane aftermath? Sorry, I'm working on a research paper and I need help on the aftermath. Sorry. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll do the Stone Cold and Bischoff feud. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

If you have time. Right now, I'll probably get to the Stone Cold and Bischoff feud. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright. I think by tonight we might be done with Unforgiven. We should be proud. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:47, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I was going to tell you about that. Why is it written like that? I guess, you and I will have to work on that. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

You need a break. If you want, I'll try to trim it down. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

You got it. You know I always have your back, Kliq member. ;) Question: Does this make sense? ---> On the October 20 edition of RAW, Co-General Manager Eric Bischoff proposed that he and Co-General Manager Steve Austin face off at Survivor Series in a "Traditional 5-on-5 Survivor Series match", to determine the future of RAW. The stipulation of the match was that if Austin's team defeated Bischoff's was that Austin could no longer have to be physically provoked before assaulting a RAW Superstar; if Bischoff’s team, however, are victorious, Austin must resign his position as Co-General Manager. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright. HELP ME WITH UNFORGIVEN. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

No, I need help for Unforgiven. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Unforgiven. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

2004. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. If it fails GA, I'll cry. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. Can you help with the copy-editing? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

You know, that I would appreciate anything you do. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. Not to be annoying or anything, but can you keep Raw like that. Since, it says at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters) to spell it out like that. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Just sayin'. But, good work. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

If you don't mind. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank YOU. Thank God you joined Wikipedia in a good time. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter Issue XI — February 24, 2008

Project News AJPW Unified World Tag Team Championship failed its Featured list nomination. Its nomination page can be found here. Royal Rumble (2005) and Over the Edge (1998) have been listed for Peer review. Please review this article and make suggestions for how it can be improved in preparation for a Good article nomination. Their peer reviews can be found here and here. No Way Out (2004) and Torrie Wilson have been elevated to Good article status. Don Kent (wrestler), Unforgiven (2004), Lisa Marie Varon, SummerSlam (1994), Ricky Banderas, New Year's Revolution (2007) and Jos LeDuc are currently Good article candidates. This newsletter will now be issued every other week, per the discussion here. Current Events Former TNA professional wrestler Chris Harris has officially signed with World Wrestling Entertainment, as confirmed by himself in his personal website. Ron Killings is still being reported as having signed a WWE contract. As there is no reliable source for anything of the sort, be prepared for his name to be continually added to the WWE Roster article, and information about his return being added to his article. There is also, apparently, an audio interview with Killings where he states he will be returning to WWE with his old K-Kwik gimmick. Recent SmackDown! Taping spoilers indicate that he debuted under the name Kwik Killings in a Dark match. No reliable source has reported this as of now, however. Bobby Lashley has been released by WWE as of February 4 On February 7, WWE announced that it would cease it's affiliation with Ohio Valley Wrestling. Also on February 7, WWE announced that SmackDown would be leaving The CW at the end of the 2007-2008 Television Season. Articles for Deletion Current: Kept: Category:Jillian Hall albums; Velvet Sky. Deleted: Mike Posey; Randy Dodge; The Pit Bulls; Category:WrestleMania venues; WWE Byte This!. Collaboration of the Week The monthly featured article collaboration for February 24 through March 2 is Mr. Kennedy. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, March 2. Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!

Member News Based on the members list, there are currently 338 members participating in WikiProject Professional wrestling. Based on the active members list, there are currently 36 members currently active in WikiProject Professional wrestling. NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members. LAX has been promoted to admin status. His RfA can be seen here. On the calendar: Feb. 17 - WWE presents No Way Out Feb. 24 - Steelerfan-94's birthday Feb. 28 - Zenlax's birthday Mar. 9 - TNA presents Destination X Mar. 25 - Kelan's birthday Mar. 26 - Govvy's birthday Mar. 30 - WWE presents WrestleMania XXIV Member Interview This week's interviewees are Kris Classic (link) and Alex Roggio (link). Next week's interviewees are D.M.N. and 3bulletproof16. Submit a question to ask them here. 3bulletproof16 has confirmed that he will indeed be taking part in the interview, even though he has retired. Professional Wrestling Article Stats Since the last newsletter, the number of stub articles has dropped by 45 while the total number of wrestling articles continues to grow. A list has been placed on the stub article subpage of stub articles of well-known wrestlers that should be fairly easy to improve. Please check it out and see what you can help with (even if you can only add a few details or a couple of references). Professional wrestling articles Importance Top High Mid Low Total Quality FA 2 3 5 FL 1 5 15 21 GA 5 16 40 61 B 1 13 65 203 282 Start 2 54 219 2355 2630 Stub 1 24 603 628 Assessed 3 74 331 3219 3627 Total 3 74 331 3219 3627 From the Editors Contributors to this Issue: Alex Roggio (talk · contribs) GaryColemanFan (talk · contribs) Gavyn Sykes (talk · contribs) iMatthew (talk · contribs) LAX (talk · contribs) Nahallac Silverwinds (talk · contribs) NiciVampireHeart (talk · contribs) S-pac54 (talk · contribs) The Chronic (talk · contribs) The Hybrid (talk · contribs) ThinkBlue (talk · contribs) TJ Spyke (talk · contribs) Truco9311 (talk · contribs) Zenlax (talk · contribs) Discussion • Suggestions • Feedback

Reply

Blue has suggested that we either work on Taboo Tuesday (2004) or Bad Blood (2004). For me, I would rather work on Bad Blood, since I would like to follow up the month accordance. But, I will make sometime to work on Backlash. Would you be interested in joining us in an expansion? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely. One thing, though; at WrestleMania XX, Benoit defeated Triple H and Shawn Michaels (at the event, Triple H was the champion, not Michaels, so I would re-arrange the sentence) I would fix that, but that's entirely up to you. I think mentioning the fact that Triple H was drafted to SmackDown! and brought back to RAW would play a good part in the background. All I've said, is basically it. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Well done. Looking back at the feud between Foley and Orton does go back to 2003. When exactly did he kick Foley? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Let me know what date exactly. As for our another expansion, Blue has agreed to work on Bad Blood. Is that fine with you? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I was going to ask if I can work on the feud between Shawn Michaels and Triple H. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Not necessarily. I would add information about the Royal Rumble (2004), WrestleMania XX, Backlash (2004) and the events after Backlash. Do you think it would be necessary to add information from 2002? I am neutral on the kick. I would say no. But, this is your decision. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

I will do. What other aftermath should I cover? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

The Foley and Orton feud came to an end at Backlash. But, Orton did engage himself in a feud with Shelton Benjamin. The Edge and Kane feud, also came to an end. But, I think I might get something with the Kane and Chris Benoit feud. What report would you like to work on for Bad Blood? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you can give the Michaels and Triple H feud, I'll let you work on whatever background you want. I think we should give Blue the event and I have no problem with the aftermath. Also, does User:Max85 qualify for a AIV? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Wanted to get the expertise from an Administrator. Do you think you can help out with my userpage? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:23, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, thank you. But, I just wanted to know if you can replace the light orange color with medium sea green. That's, if you can. Zenlax ^{T C S} 19:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Bad Blood (2004) has been created. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

The "Useful links". I think you should work on the Kane and Benoit feud. The Orton and Shelton feud, I think, we should give to Blue. So, we can all we even with the report. Unless, you want to work on both feuds. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Please do inform Blue on the split of the article. Thank you for taking the time to fix the problem on my userpage. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I would like for the 'Welcome' section to match the 'Useful links'. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank so much for helping me with my nonsense. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

LAX, I don't know how I can ever repay you. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I've added somewhat information into the background. Feel free to make any changes if needed. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

List of World Wrestling Entertainment alumni

I'm working on it in my sandbox. I'd like to know what you think of it before I go any further. iMatthew 2008 23:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Hey man, it's been a while since we've talked. My late congratulations on becoming an admin. So, how goes it amigo? SexySeaBass 05:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

My decision to never become an admin has a long story behind it. My first RfA I failed due to inexperience, as I was only three months and 2800 edits into my career. My second, they didn't like how I handled disputes, and they took a question I asked on the RfA talk page the wrong way. Like most admins at the time, they weren't open to correction by anyone with less than 10,000 edits, so they refused to acknowledge they took it the wrong way, and summarily voted no. In preparation for the third, I discovered a few things. Number one, Wikipedia doesn't use a real system of consensus; rather, it uses some warped knock-off and isn't open to the real system of Consensus decision-making. Number two, admins who call a spade a spade are hauled off to the arbitration committee and summarily crucified unless the admin is skilled enough to discredit his opposition, bend the arb com over, and give them a firm and kinky spanking for even taking the RfAr. Number three, I had hit the catch-22 point Moe Epsilon hit where I have been in too many disputes for their liking, and the longer I stay the more I'll be in. So, I discovered exactly where I am was the perfect place for me all along. I have the liberty of being able to call people what they are, and I don't have to deal with the non-functional bureaucracy unless I choose to. I am also free to take on as many disputes as I want without having a target on my back. I don't have to fear getting hauled off to ANI any time I rub someone the wrong way, which I usually do the first time the person meets me in a dispute. I'm tempted to run, just because I know I'll probably get so much votestacking from the project I'll pass, but all-in-all the tools don't appeal to me anymore. I have them on some Wikias, and I don't think the tools are worth it. It isn't the Godmode I used to think it was; rather, the sacrificed liberty means admins are less free than everyone else. I'm perfectly content to use admins like you as my slave ;)

Anyway, I haven't been up to much. I've done some RC Patrolling, and I'm getting ready for some stuff coming up in real life; some fun, some not so fun. Out of curiosity, are you thinking of running for BCrat someday? I know it's a bit early for that, but I'm just curious. Later mi hermano, SexySeaBass 22:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, like I said, long story. Anyway, I do hope that you make BCrat someday. It's been a while since I've been in the more advanced stages of sockpuppeteer crushing, but if things are at all like they were this time last year, we need some more good BCrats, as they're usually the CheckUsers.. Cheers, SexySeaBass 23:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

hi

congrats pal. I'm On Base 23:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

SexyLax?

Blue and I would like to know if you would like to change ur signature to "SexyLax". I'm doing "Sexy iMatthew", and then we can do "SexyThinkBlue", and if wanted, "SexyTruco9311", and "SexyZenlax." The "Sexy" in all of them can link to "The Kliq's" main page. Wadda you think. Sexy iMatthew 2008 00:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I like both Sexy LAX and SexyBlue. Sexy iMatthew 2008 00:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

In case you want to, I now proclaim you sexy. Woot 00:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Hybrid (talk • contribs)

Hmm, looks like I hit ~ one too many times. Anyway, absolutely, I was hoping I'd be able to bring sexy back. Peace, SexySeaBass 00:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Awesome, now I'm don't feel like an outcast. I always thought I was just too sexy... but now I feel alive. Peace ;) SexySeaBass 00:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Ok, its just that I was really getting tired after 1 am, and working on most of the big matchs, i'll keep the wording down. KK NimiTize 13:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry I'll finish up after I get back from the mall, me and my bro are going, jus to shop I guess. And if you want you can be my guest to check it out make sure its good, not so long. ;) Cheers! NimiTize 13:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Me nethier I have the time now, so am doing the RVD, Christian and Jericho match, then JR and Jerry Lawler.....etc. but I might need some help on the aftermath NimiTize 21:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh yea, she only told me to work/expand/re write the Event section, so I guess she'll work on it. And if you need anything else from me, please contact me ;) NimiTize 21:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Also if you want to squeeze in on some cleanup, feel free 2 KK NimiTize 21:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Wait, I don't get it?? lol, but I just want to get the matchs over with writing all this stuff by HAND (But am always happy to do requested work, from people like you and Blue) and then do alot of major cleanups, and ill mabye make a sandbox to work on all of this. NimiTize 21:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Well yea, am kinda new but I know alot already. And I know you werent meaning it in a bad way ;) NimiTize 21:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

No prob, and if you need anything else, contact me. I'll contact you and Blue when I finish up on the event section. KK NimiTize 21:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

--Finished up in the Event section, although I wasent able to expand the HBK vs Orton match and the Coachman and AL vs JR and Jerry, sorry. NimiTize 18:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi

hey, whats up? ElisaEXPLOSiONtalk. 17:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Ha. Well, part of it was the fact that I am trying to solve a dispute about a page that I was editing. But whatever. ElisaEXPLOSiONtalk. 13:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Someone uploaded picture of Kofi Kingston is it allowed on Wiki?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 03:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh well, it got deleted.lol--TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm thinking of changing my username, what would I have to do to carry my info over to it? TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok Thanx. I have done that. Waiting for it to be changed say hell to "Truco X"..lolz--TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

IDK Feel that 9311 makes my username a bit longer, and doesnt really flow. So an X will fix both of that.TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Yep. You should change yours (just playing)..lolTrUCo⁹31¹ 00:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

WTF! Is going on in the offices of WWE? [3] --TrUCo⁹31¹ 20:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Well whoever hacked it had brains, and I see them being sued or w/e, but you never know mayby WWE did post that? --TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah me too, seems really weird. I never though I would live to see the day TNA news would be on WWE.com, wow. Crap, the name changing process takes forever..--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

The funny thing is that the "clerk" has reviewed requests in front of me but not mine..--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, that explains that...mayby ill get it change by tonight. Wat was your old username?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:45, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, Dont I feel smart... Did you ever finish WMXIX?TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I would have finished it for you, but IM kinda tied up with school.TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No prob...So whats up?TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh man, you should have just merged our edits somehow as some of my edits were significant to the clean up of the HHH/RKO feud. You also reverted all of my edits that I did to the BG/Event section.TrUCo⁹31¹ 04:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson

Hi i noticed that you reverted my move of The Rock to Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. I know i probably got a bit ahead of myself so i can understand your revert but I really think his page should be moved I mean he hasn't gone by just The Rock for years, at the Oscars for example he was introduced as Dwayne Johnson Ipunknown (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

WM 24

My apologies on that. I had not seen the source before I reverted. I won't be so quick in the future - lesson learned.  :) ArcAngel (talk) 04:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

RE:

Its alright. I was going to inform both you and Blue if we can post-pone Bad Blood, as I too want to finish Backlash and I made a promise to you that I would finish the article. Its no problem at all. After your done with your expansions, would you reconsider in helping out with Bad Blood? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, you are always welcome to help out. One more question, what other aftermath would you like for me to conclude into Backlash? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I do notice that at Backlash, Chris Jericho defeated Christian and Trish Stratus in a Handicap match, which was transcend to Bad Blood, where Jericho faced Stratus' and Christian's enforcer, Tyson Tomko. Would that work in the aftermath? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Good, I will add that as soon as possible. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

This Weekend

Cross posted to other Kliq members

I propose that this weekend:

• We stop all of the projects we are currently working on, and work on SummerSlam (2002), Survivor Series (2003), and Royal Rumble (2008). Those have been on hold for too long. They need to be finished.
• We ask NimiTize to help us finish these projects, and judging by his edits, we can make a decision on whether we want him in the Kliq, or we don't. iMatthew 2008 22:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

What do you think? iMatthew 2008 00:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I think it was a edit conflict and my version got stored.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 04:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Well the only way is too restore my edits, and you then do the copy editing (in your perspective) on the HHH/RKO feud, is that ok?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 04:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Well what I meant was I did some minor adjustments hows that? And my bad, my bad...calm down..TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

That's ok. It happens to all of us.TrUCo⁹31¹ 16:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

My glowing orange bar

Next time you remove anything like that from a users page, please notify them. Thank you. Basketball110 _{what famous people say} 23:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I saw that. If I had done that, I would have told the user. Basketball110 _{what famous people say} 00:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay. Basketball110 _{what famous people say} ♣ 00:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Autograph Book

Dude that was fast!!! Thanks for the sig. LOL, you and Matt better not fight over who was second!! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 01:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

NiciVampireHeart has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!

You're welcome! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 01:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Please read my comment on Nici's talk page. iMatthew 2008 01:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'm a nice person. I think. I get on with ya, so you're a wikifriend. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 02:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Idea

What do you think of this:

• I think that we should invite D.M.N. and bulletproof to return for one final PPV project with the Kliq. If they agree for one more, then all seven past and present members will work on this project. With seven people working on it, we could easily make this article (whatever is chose), a future GA, or even FA. Just an idea, especially to let D.M.N. and bulletproof know that we're still thinking of them. iMatthew 2008 14:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

He is, but I have his e-mail address and he is still answering questions n his interview. I can try to convince him to return for 1 final project with The Kliq. If he declines, we can still ask D.M.N. iMatthew 2008 14:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure yet. We should ask Blue, Truco, and Zenlax though before we pick a PPV and invite D.M.N. and bulletproof. If the three of them agree, then we can invite D.M.N. and bulletproof, then pick the PPV. Right? iMatthew 2008 14:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Same here. Would you like to ask the other members, or should I? iMatthew 2008 14:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure. iMatthew 2008 14:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Please see my comments on Truco's talk page and his comments on my talk page. iMatthew 2008 16:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Please help Nici and I explain the importance of not taking ownership of articles to User:LindsieandLance. The user tried to get Nici to stop editing Lance Cade. I'm not sure if their comments on mine and Nici's talk pages are considered personal attacks or not. iMatthew 2008 16:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

already tooking care of

iMatthew told me that. But thanks.LindsieandLance (talk) 16:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

My userpage

Re this: It was indefinitely semi-protected. It appears that you changed the level to 1 week somehow - out of curiosity, how did you manage to accidentally change the protection level? Xenon⁵⁴ 17:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Question

Does this look familiar? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't know. He copied Truco's sig. and now he's copied mine. What are we going to do? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:OWN NimiTize 22:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

He is really getting on my last nerve. iMatthew 2008 22:47, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I notifyed him, if he dosent remove it, ill just blank his page, with the expection of {{userpage}}. NimiTize 22:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Are we still on for Unforgiven '03? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

He keeps re-adding Royal Rumble 2004 to his page. I am the only one working on expanding this article. I left him a civil message, and if he refuses to remove it, I will have to myself, again. iMatthew 2008 23:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I know, I am asking him nicely to please let me do this by myself, because I am trying to gain the experience of writing a PPV by myself, and he won't give in. iMatthew 2008 23:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! iMatthew 2008 23:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm down. Do you want to split the matches? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

You take four and I take four. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

You take the first four and I'll take the last four. I'll write them in my sandbox. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm down. Which four do you want? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Fine by me. P.S. Thanks for giving me a "cool" match. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

No. I get to work on a exciting match. That's what I meant. Does that make sense? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I'll try to get some by today. And, yes I saw the second review. Thanks for letting me know. ;) I answered some of the issues. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I know you have my back, Kliq member. ;) And I appreciate it. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the userbox! iMatthew 2008 00:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Pardon my French.... Hell Yeah, I'll help you get Unforgiven to GA. I'm not abandoning you. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Professional Wrestling Barnstar
		For all of your hard work in getting Unforgiven (2004) to GA status. iMatthew 2008 00:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

De nada. iMatthew 2008 00:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Good. I'm just all caught up in the moment about Unforgiven passing GA. It reminds me of the other GA that I helped get to GA status. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:43, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yup. Do you want to work on SummerSlam right now or.... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually yes becuase you did do some clean up and added templates to it, so yes. --TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Let's rock-and-roll this thing. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes. That's what I meant by let's rock-and-roll this thing. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Done. Also, I think its time your talk page got an archive shortage. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about the dates, but the first two sentences had the full date and the others didn't. One thing, though. There's a whole lot of WWE.com refs., can I replace some of them? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll keep the Chavo and Rey "I Quit" match, the one where Orton "kicked" Cena's dad in the head and Punk winning the ECW title refs. Is that cool? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Cool. Hey, what happens if Cimmo wants to join the Kliq? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

No offense taken whatsoever. But, yeah for the future. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. Sorry for not logging in earlier, I went to a party. Who's nominating Unforgiven? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I guess that's fine. Since, I took to long to log in. SummerSlam, looks fine, but the Cena and Orton feud seems a little off; its just one thing, After the match, Orton came out and attacked Cena, RKOing him through a Steel chair., I think it should say that Orton attacked Cena, which led to Orton hitting an RKO on Cena through a Steel chair. You feel me? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

No. I'm saying to add that Orton attacked Cena, which led to him delivering an RKO to Cena on a Steel chair. Do you get me now? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

No. It would state that Orton hit himself with an RKO. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

There you go. Sorry if I was picky But, everything looks fine. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Your going to nominate it for FA first? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. ;) Yeah, I can see SummerSlam pass GA, but IDK about FA. But, I'll keep my fingers crossed for both. ;) Hey, did you write the GAB '07? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Its written well. Probably can become a future GA. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

When you get the time, do it. Totally forgot about Unforgiven '03; are we still on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

He's on break. Do you think he'll want to work on it? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I don't mind. I would like to apologize for not working on Unforgiven. If you want, we can work on SummerSlam or Unforgiven '06, if you want to work on Unforgiven and later work on Unforgiven '03. Is that cool or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Your SummerSlam. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

IDK. I was just assuming you wanted to work on SummerSlam. But, are you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Needed to clear some stuff up. Um, I guess you can do that. I left a message and they didn't reply until Unforgiven was under review. I'll keep my fingers crossed so SS can pass. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, IDK cause I gave my word to Matt that he could've nominated it. But, he wants me to do it. So... I guess I'll do it whenever you nominate SummerSlam. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll do the same. Um, yeah. I'm working on the Aftermath, do you mind fixing whatever needs to be fixed? Don't get the Aftermath, I don't want an "edit conflict" --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Cool. ;) Hey, do you think it might be important to add that DX faced Big Show on ECW and Triple H facing Vince at MSG? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I'll add it. Thanks for the feedback. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey, is any PPV near you this year? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Really? That's sad. What about Raw, ECW, SmackDown!..... TNA? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, if I remove Unforgiven now, just imagine how long it will take to get the review. I'll leave it. I'll work on it and stuff. Yes, you can hate for not obeying the PW rules. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Really? Do you need help? Do you think he can give Unforgiven a pre-GA? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Cool then. You want to do things your way. I respect that. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

No offense whatsoever. Um, I would like to work on Survivor Series '06. So, are people vandalizing your talk page? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Yokozuna box

I added the note to the yokozuna box because the very way it is set up, it suggests that one yokozuna succeeds the previous, which is not the case. I did this to all the the yokozunas' articles, not just the ones that became K1 wrestlers. FourTildes (talk) 23:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

be blocked from what

be blocked from what i just want a userpage like everyone else and im going to ask people if i can have some stuff off there page. so why am i disruptive when im not doing anything?)Cimmo (talk) 23:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Can i copy and paste your "Pay-per-views currently expanding / improving" and ill put my own pay-per views on there, but i wont delete it. Cimmo (talk) 23:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

im not doing anything to the Royal Rumble 2004, you said that matt keeps asking not for me to do it, but im not doing anything to that pay-per view, since he wants to do it on his own, im letting him doing that and you've still havent answered my question. Cimmo (talk) 23:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

ill have to give you Credit for your userpage and your talk page aswell you know what your doing Cheers im giving you heaps of Credit. Cimmo (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

ill have to give you credit for your ;Pay-per-views currently expanding / improving. Cimmo (talk) 00:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Are you working on any Pay-Per Views? Cimmo (talk) 7:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Can i help you with any? Cimmo (talk) 7:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

How do i create a sandbox so i can write an article and then put it into a page?. Cimmo (talk) 5:11, March 2008 (UTC)

Royal Rumble (2004)

How does the first feud in the background look? iMatthew 2008 12:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing some things. iMatthew 2008 13:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and HAPPY ONE MONTH ANNIVERSARY AS AN ADMINISTRATOR! iMatthew 2008 13:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the advise! I just want to make sure it's looks good, since it's the first background I've ever written. I'll get on that change right now. And your welcome for the congrats! iMatthew 2008 13:36, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Is that better (on the article) ? iMatthew 2008 13:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! So I recommend we work on Unforgiven 05 and SummerSlam 07 today, so that by later on tonight, we might be able to get them nominated for GA. iMatthew 2008 13:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

When Truco comes on, I'm going to ask him to help me with Unforgiven. iMatthew 2008 13:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep! Taking the easy way again, I know! LOL, no. I took it because I can actually remeber what at it, so I figured that could only be an advantage to me! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 13:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm gonna finish the King Of The Ring build up (which shows the feuds for half the matches), and I think I might mention the Taker/Khali one as well. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Will do! Thanks! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Isn't against a wikipedia policy to use the orange bar in your userpage, such as here? iMatthew 2008 14:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Would you mind doing it for me. You seem to be familiar with the policy, and I am not. iMatthew 2008 14:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. iMatthew 2008 14:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

In the event section right? No probs. Less work for me! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Grand. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Yea, pretty great. The big problem (and it's not even that big ;D) was wikilinking The Great American Bash everytime it appeared in the background section. I fixed that for you, though! You might need a citation for the secondary tagline though, "The Party Is Over", there isn't one in the article at the moment. Let ya know more when I finish. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

That's an excellent point. I didn't see that... ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree actually. It looks good, and once you do the main event you'll be all set. All the references are good, so I wouldn't anticipate any major problems with it. The only thing I want to do is put the references in numerical order, they're not in it in a couple of places, but after that it's good to go IMO. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Looks good to me. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

It's no problem. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Would you support letting Nici into the Kliq. (If she accepts this time). iMatthew 2008 15:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I signed. ;D ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

It's no problem! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 17:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Please go here and vote. iMatthew 2008 17:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

RE:RfA

Why thank you, but it is not over yet. A whole lot could happen in the next few hours. :P Tiptoety ^talk 16:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words, I hope it turns out well. Tiptoety ^talk 16:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello again

Please don't take the bar off of "Userboxes I've created," for that page includes everything I've created. Cheers, Basketball110 _{what famous people say} ♣ 17:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

It's against policy, so it must be removed. iMatthew 2008 17:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Can you leave WP:PW a message saying that SummerSlam 07 and Unforgiven 05 are going to be nominated soon. A lot of users like us to notify them first, so that they can make any necessary changes. iMatthew 2008 19:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Much better than before. iMatthew 2008 19:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome. Btw, I added a picture of Kurt Angle to Unforgiven. Anything wrong with it? iMatthew 2008 20:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Any idea where Blue is today? iMatthew 2008 20:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I know. And Zenlax hasn't been on in a few days. iMatthew 2008 20:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

That would make sense. iMatthew 2008 20:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Looks fine to me - I just made a spelling correction, but other than that I really don't see any problems with it. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 20:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Professional Wrestling Barnstar
		Thanks for all of your help today with Unforgiven and Royal Rumble. You're hardy work is greatly appreciated! iMatthew 2008 21:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

ok, where's mine? LOL. JUST KIDDING. iMatthew 2008 21:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

You didn't force me, you just deserve it. You put in a lot of time and effort. iMatthew 2008 21:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

SummerSlam is so good I think it could skip GA and go straight to FA. It's that good. iMatthew 2008 21:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

No offense, but I wasn't suggestion, just saying it's that good. I 100% agree that it should be GA first then FA. iMatthew 2008 21:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Today's been a pretty slow day. You were like, the only one online, and Nici. Truco was on for a while, but then disappeared. iMatthew 2008 23:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, it's still about 3:30 in the afternoon by her. There's still a chance of her coming on today. iMatthew 2008 23:26, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Same here. Anyway, I'll be back in like 5 minutes, then I'm going to review what Nici has for Judgment Day so far. iMatthew 2008 23:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Oops, I meant 15. Starting now. lol. iMatthew 2008 23:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm back! And like 15 minutes late. lol. iMatthew 2008 00:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Haven't gotten to it yet. Why you ask. Check the Kliq's talk page to find out! iMatthew 2008 00:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

So have I. Once everyone puts in their nominations, we can cut down the list to like 5 PPV's to vote from. If this is going to be D.M.N. and bulletproof's last PPV with us, I want it to be the perfect PPV. iMatthew 2008 01:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I really don't want to go around and delete glowing orange bars, so you do it. Basketball110 _{what famous people say} ♣ 01:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Please vote in the poll for NimiTize. iMatthew 2008 02:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Im sorry for not replying to the comment about the SummerSlam main event, which SS is it? Since its not in your sandbox anymore.--TrUCo-X 02:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, either way it reads great. Also can you look over No Way Out (2007) me and Nikki did major clean up on it, as I also pulled it from GAN, but will nominate it again later this week.--TrUCo-X 02:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done, anything else?TrUCo-X 02:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok cool. TrUCo-X 02:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Getting off for the night, be back tomorrow (early morning and night.) Goodnight! iMatthew 2008 03:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't realize that article didn't exist. (One Big Show's article). Btw, just wondering..how many articles are in your watchlist? iMatthew 2008 23:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, If nobody responds, tonight. iMatthew 2008 23:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

47. But I'm doing to add more. iMatthew 2008 23:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Did you sit there are manually add all of those articles to your watchlist, or did you have a bot do it, or some other way. Also, the next round of voting is up at The Kliq's page. iMatthew 2008 23:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

If you ever find time, please try to explain it, if you can. I would greatly appreciate it. (If you do, it's not something I need immediately). iMatthew 2008 00:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I COULD!!!?? I don't know how to do that, but if you could explain it, I would appreciate it! iMatthew 2008 00:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC) Pay attention tonight on Raw. User:Steelerfan-94 is attending, and plans to hold up a DX-Green sign that says "Hey Matt and Kevin." (Kevin obviously being Truco). He thinks he is sitting in section 6 or 7. iMatthew 2008 00:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Just did and it worked! Thanks a bunch! iMatthew 2008 01:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 06:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter

The WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter Volume I, No. 5 - March 2008 February issue | April issue Project News There are currently 3,647 Good Articles listed at WP:GA. The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 185 unreviewed articles. Out of 237 total nominations, 42 are on hold, and 10 are under review. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance! The oldest unreviewed articles are: Ian Browne (cyclist), Tony Marchant, Reginald fitz Jocelin, Annie Russell, Brodie Croyle, and Jimmy Moore. The top five categories with the largest backlogs are: Sports and recreation (39 articles), Theatre, film, and drama (34 articles), Transport (23 articles), Music (21 articles), Politics and government (18 articles), Culture and society (13 articles), Places (13 articles), and World history (12 articles). The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 13 articles up for re-review. If every participant of WikiProject Good Articles could review just one article in the next week, the backlog would be almost eliminated! GA Sweeps Update Two members joined the sweeps team this month. They are Jwanders and jackyd101. Jwanders swept Physics sub-category quickly and is now sweeping "Astronomy and astrophysics". Meanwhile, jackyd101 is sweeping "Armies, military units and legal issues". During February, 66 Good Articles were reviewed. Including those articles that were under GAR or on hold, 33 were kept as GA, 21 delisted, 17 currently on hold or at GAR, and 1 was exempted as they are now Featured Articles. Reviewer of the Month Blnguyen is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for February, based on the assessments made by Epbr123 on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Blnguyen is from South Australia and has been editing Wikipedia since 2005. He was also the reviewer for the month of December 2007, so this marks the second time that he has been GAN's Top Reviewer for the Month. Congratulations to our GAN Reviewer of the Month for February! Other outstanding reviewers recognized during the month of January include: Blnguyen (talk · contribs) David Fuchs (talk · contribs) Derek.cashman (talk · contribs) Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk · contribs) Calbear22 (talk · contribs) Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) Jackturner3 (talk · contribs) TimVickers (talk · contribs) VanTucky (talk · contribs) Wrad (talk · contribs) Member News There are now 185 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 9 new members that joined during the month of February: Bibliomaniac15 (talk · contribs) Canyouhearmenow (talk · contribs) Chrisisinchrist (talk · contribs) Ed! (talk · contribs) Juliancolton (talk · contribs) Kakofonous (talk · contribs) LOTRrules (talk · contribs) Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) Nousernamesleft (talk · contribs) Did You Know... ...that the shortest timespan for a GA to be listed and subsequently delisted is 8 minutes? (The article is Project Chanology and currently listed on WP:GAR) ...that the current nominations system started on March 10, 2006? ...that in May 2006, number of GA surpassed number of FA? This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all! One GA Requirement - The Lead Section By Geometry guy In this issue, we will focus on one of the requirements for good articles: a good article article should follow Wikipedia's guideline on lead sections. So what does this guideline say, why does it say what it does, and how can good article reviewers help? The lead section is particularly important, because for many readers, it is the only part of the article which they will read. For instance, they may have come to the article by following a wikilink in another article simply to obtain a quick overview before they continue reading the original article. They may only read the first paragraph, or even the first sentence. On the other hand, one of the joys of Wikipedia is the way that embodies the endlessly branching tree of knowledge; if a lead is well written, it may encourage even such a reader to read on and learn something new. This is reflected in the terminology: "lead" is a word taken from journalism, where it recognized that many readers will only read the beginning of a newspaper article, and so it is important to convey the key points first, before going into detail. Note that "lead", in this sense, is pronounced as in "leading question" and is sometimes spelled as "lede" by journalists to distinguish it from lead, the metal, which was once very important in typesetting. Wikipedia supports both spellings. Wikipedia:Lead section is written with all this in mind, and describes two different roles for the lead: first, it should introduce the topic; second it should summarize the article. This is not always as easy as it seems; indeed, it is almost impossible to write a good lead if the article itself does not cover the topic well. It has a side benefit that an article which satisfies this guideline is probably also broad: if the lead is both a good introduction and a summary, then the article probably covers the main points. The good article process is often the first place in which an article is judged against this criterion, yet many current good articles may not meet it. A common fault is that the lead is purely an introduction, while the rest of the article contains other information, which should be summarized in the lead, but isn't. So, how can reviewers help to improve this? One approach is to read the rest of the article, and not the lead, first. Make a note of the significant points discussed in the article. There is usually at least one important issue in each section. Then, go back to the lead and ask the following questions: Does the first sentence of the lead define the topic, as described in the article? Is the most important information mentioned in the first paragraph? Is the lead a suitable length for the article? The lead guideline recommends 2–4 paragraphs depending on the article length, but judgment is more important than counting. Are each of the significant topics that you noted mentioned in the lead? If the answer to each of these questions is "yes", then the article probably meets the guideline. If not, you may be able to fix it yourself by summarizing the article. If you can't, then it suggests that there are not only problems with the lead, but also the rest of the article. That is the beauty of Wikipedia:Lead section. Finally, there isn't universal agreement on whether the lead should contain inline citations. As long as the material in the lead is developed and cited elsewhere in the article, then inline citation is not required. There are exceptions, the most significant being quotations and controversial material about living persons. Good luck helping more articles meet this important criterion! From the Editors Well, this is somewhat GA-related but at the same time not totally GA-related. However, I think this is important. Thanks to everyone who supported me at my 2nd RfA. It passed unanimously at 79 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral. As many are impressed by my work in Good Articles processes, I want to take this opportunity to thank everyone giving me a very enjoyable time at GA. There are 2 people that I want to explicitly say thank you to. They are Nehrams2020 and Epbr123. They patiently taught me how to do GA reviews properly in summer 2007. I couldn't achieve better without them. Now that I have the mop and the bucket, some of my time will be working on reducing Commons image backlog. Nevertheless, you will still see me once in a while in matters related to GA. OhanaUnited Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here. Dr. Cash Contributors to this Issue Dr. Cash (Lead Editor, Distributor) OhanaUnited (GA Sweeps and Did You Know correspondent) Geometry guy (News Correspondent) Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005! WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia. Nominations: • Unforgiven (2006) • Corporation Park, Blackburn • The Great American Bash (2007) • Jenny (Doctor Who) • No Such Thing as Vampires Reassessment: Sweeps / List: references (All Categories), image tags (All Categories), article quality (All Categories) Possible GAs Needing References: Clarinet • Carleton University • Appalachian Mountains Task forces: Project quality • Unreferenced GA Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations queue: 216 articles (42 of them are on hold) as of 08:00, 15 June 2008 | edit