User talk:LAX/Archive 5

Graduate

I don't know what the proper process is to bail out of adoption, but I think my interests have passed the quick answer stage. Your attention is better invested elsewhere now. I'm sure you'll be an excellent admin. Good luck! --Pearrari (talk) 04:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:WrestleMania XX

Oh, I've been busy with school with exams and reports but this weekend im free (YESS!!) I will start hte expansion tommorow.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 03:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, buh yea I will start tommorow or this weekend. So hows your adminship going?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 03:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

HAHAHA...you have the right to be a dick...lolz....das great I see we have a new admin to the WP:PW, hey since I have had multiple accounts, can those edits count and be added to my current edit count?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 03:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

So I can't do it anymore?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 03:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

"DAMN" {Ron Simmons}, lol...well w/ u becoming a admin, will u still be a strong member of the kliq? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 03:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh ok cool...so wats ^..lls —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Wats ^ (means "whats up")- lls (is another version of 'lolz')

TrUCo⁹31¹ 03:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Stressin over skool..buh livin the vida loca..(Crazy life)..lol--TrUCo⁹31¹ 03:50, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

HaHa, its funny how you reverted the IP edits on Kofi Kingston right when I was about to do it with Twinkle.TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Why don't IP's ever follow what the hidden comments say...*sigh* So Mr. Administrator, wats up.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow ur such a dick..lol..syke naw...you watching the Royal Rumble?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I need a little help Mr. Administrator. I'd like my signature to be at the top of my userpage/talk page. Chronic is having a little difficulty though. Please see if you can fix it. Btw, maybe "The Kliq" can step up and be responsible for completing the RR08 article after the event. iMatthew 22:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I am. I want to see Ron Killings and The Big Show...But Im watching it for free.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Do you want to see it?TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Go Here at 8 oclock in your area....--TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!. Btw, I'm ordering the Rumble (just FYI) lol. iMatthew 23:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

No prob...If that stops working for probably too many people watching it just tell me, I can still give u like 5 more links..lolTrUCo⁹31¹ 23:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

RFA

LAX/Archive 5, Thank you for your support in my RFA which passed 43/0/1. I would like to especially thank Bibliomaniac15 for being my nominator and admin coach. I would also like to thank Rudget for being my co-nominator. I'm sure that I can live up to the community's expectations as an administrator, and not totally mess everything up. Thanks again for your support! Malinaccier (talk) 17:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandal

I've reported that IP to WP:AIV (the IP that vandalised this talkpage not 2 minutes ago). D.M.N. (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Cheers, LAX 21:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Within 2 seconds of me doing that, the IP was blocked. :) D.M.N. (talk) 21:52, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

That's good to know. =D Cheers, LAX 21:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment

Even though I am out of retirement, I am still not really going to be active here. I am far to busy in real life, thus I am not really going to be here that much. I am doing quite well actually:-) How are you?--SJP (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

WWE SVR 2008

Ok I want to fix the Roster page of this article, and I have done that in my User:Truco9311/Sandbox but because I am using footnotes, the footnotes and the actual page's references get mixed in. Is there a way I can fix that?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

So can you? or do you know someone else who knows how?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

N/m U DID IT!! OMG! THANX SO MUCH..--TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

No, that is perfect. Can you voice your opinion on this discussionTrUCo⁹31¹ 23:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

That's all that matters. Your honest opinion.TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

How can we make the WWE Roster a FL?TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah

lol you would defiantly be a good administrator. you are real good lol every vandilism revert I see gots your signature in it lol.. you are quick :-D hope u make admin.. good luck --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 01:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. That really means alot to me ;). Cheers, LAX 01:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Florida Democratic primary, 2008

Why have you reverted my edit to Florida Democratic primary, 2008?98.203.237.75 (talk) 23:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

It was an honest mistake, I was over zealous. You may revert. Cheers, LAX 23:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the courteous response. I see you are up for RfA. Good luck, I think your professional and courteous demeanor would be good for an admin - just be careful to keep in mind WP:BITE. With great power comes great responsibility, and all that.98.203.237.75 (talk) 07:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Clifford the Big Red Dog revert

Could you give me a little insight into your thinking re: making this revert [1]? I don't see anything wrong with the IP's version, and in fact, I think it's an improvement. I looked on the talk page to see whether there was something to speak against it, and there wasn't....I'm just wondering what your reasoning was. Thanks! Gladys J Cortez 02:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I just thought that the other was perfectly fine, but since you felt the previous revision was better, I have reverted my edit. Cheers, LAX 10:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt response! Gladys J Cortez 17:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:

Thanks for signing the Guestbook. →Dust Rider→ 18:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Congrats!

Here's a toast. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The RFA passed! Congratulations are in order! :D D.M.N. (talk) 19:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

CONGRATULATIONS. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Good luck with the shiny new buttons LAX. Hope you wear the lettering right off 'em. In time, of course. OMG, get away from the main page...what are you doing? nooooooo.....Keeper | 76 20:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll be expecting one. Just kidding. I'm going to start Armageddon. I trust that Matt will finish the Aftermath for SummerSlam. Then, we can continue our PPV quest. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:10, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

You are now an administrator

Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the administrators' how-to guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Also, the practice exercises at the new admin school may be useful. If you have any questions, get in touch on my talk page. WjBscribe 19:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Sorry

C'est la vie. It's fine. Thank you anyways. Tell me if you ever want to help me (remotely funny sounding), but I think I am doing fine now. Thank you, and you don't have to respond to this if you don't want to. Manu-ve^talk pro Ski^contribs 19:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The Chronic presents... a new-admin gift basket

Congrats on your newfound dictatorial janitorial tools. Here is some random bullshit that you may need in your quest to help you in your quest to harass and persecute innocent bystanders in the maintenance of technical operation of Wikipedia. :D

A bucket with holes at the bottom of it, and a used mop.	A flail to hit vandals with.	Two cans of WikiBeer.	A chronic.
A $400 bottle of Cristal.	A slice of pizza.	An apple with a bite taken out of it.	Somewhat self-explanatory...

~ The Chronic 00:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

So how are the new tools?... :) The Chronic 00:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

AN

Why did you remove [move=sysop]? Last time it was removed, a vandal moved it about and, given the number of revisions, it killed editing for ages moving it back. Please restore the move-protection for administrators only, thanks. Daniel (talk) 11:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I restored the protection. Please don't do that again, or at least give a reason in your edit summary. Many thanks, Majorly (talk) 12:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Paul Harald Kaspar (talk · contribs)

I have unblocked this user. Their edits before you blocked them were not vandalism - they seem to have been made in good faith and the user was participating in discussion on the talkpage. No warning had recently been given. Looking at the report at WP:AIV, I think you should have realised this was a content dispute [2]. Vandalblocks should be for vandalism, removing content may be a legitimate editorial decision (even where others disagree). I recommend going a little easier on the block button... WjBscribe 12:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Ultraexactzz is now an Administrator

My RfA was successful, and closed with 44 Supports, 6 Opposes, and 1 Neutral. For your support, you have my thanks - I fully intend to live up to the lofty yet not-a-big-deal responsibility you have granted me. For those who opposed my candidacy, I value your input and advice, and hope that I may prove worthy of your trust. Special thanks to both Rudget and bibliomaniac15 for their expert coaching and guidance. I look forward to serving the project, my fellow editors, the pursuit of higher knowledge, et cetera, et cetera. Again, you have my thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 01:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Armageddon

Thumbs up. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, maybe we can ask Matt to do it, since I also want to start working on Armageddon. Are we writing everything in separate sanboxes or.... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Alright, just wanted to know where it was going to be written. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Now. You? Or are you going to celebrate your Adminship? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'm looking at the matches and yeah that's about it. So, yeah. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, can you do me a favor and delete both images, as they have already been replaced with other ones. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I really appreciate it. ;) Hey, was Armageddon a PPV for both Raw and SmackDown!? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Are we going to add a table to the article? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, wasn't Armageddon 2002 a PPV between Raw and SmackDown!? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, my bad. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Raw and SmackDown! sharing the same PPV, as they've done with WrestleMania and SummerSlam. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

True about that. How are the feuds coming in? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Just checkin'. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure. I wouldn't mind in helping getting SummerSlam '07 to GA status. ;) We can probably do that in between. What do you think? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Oofa, the article has a lot of refs. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, for that, we can work together and get the article to GA status. We will need opinions by others. Sorry if I'm taking too long to answer; I'm sort of watching the Democratic debate. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:50, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Getting SS 07 to GA isnt the right move, getting it to FA is the right move =). IT is well sourced and well written. Did you take part in writing it?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, we got Truco's POV. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I know, I just reminded Truco that Lex did that for New Years Revolution and it failed. We should do the GA first. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

True. Maybe after we get SummerSlam to GA, we can probably work on Survivor Series or after we're done with Armageddon to GA status. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, ok. It will take time (especially the nomination process, if you know what I mean [NWO 04]) TrUCo⁹31¹ 02:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Of course and we can probably work on our PPV's to get them there. And yeah, I would say to wait, since I nominated Unforgiven '04 to the GA-list and there hasn't been no progress. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Well NWO is like in the top 15 or 20 on the GA list, so it should get reviewed soon. So did you pass your RfA?TrUCo⁹31¹ 02:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm down with everything. Man, are we going to be busy. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Man absolutely. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Im Not Worthy *Im Not Worthy..lol (Bow Down To The King)TrUCo⁹31¹ 02:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

HAHA...yea that way we can have more GA articles credited to the Kliq and ourselves.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 02:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

We would rule PW. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Then, let's continue working. But also, get some breaks here and there. ;) So, your down with working on a PPV one week, then working on another the following? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Glad to hear that. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, if that's okay with everyone. "Break it Down" and tell me what needs to be done. P.S. I love your warning. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Nice. It makes your talk page look more professional. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

If you need me to, then sure! iMatthew 21:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, what needs work? If it's the aftermath, I would need help, because I cannot do those easily yet. iMatthew 21:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I would like to, but the Background sections really confuse me. I'm going to start looking over some FA and GA PPV's and learn what Background and Aftermath sections should look like. So, I don't think I should write it because it will not be written too well yet. Also, Which Armageddon are you working on? Blue said I should ask you if I can help you with it. (I'd be glad to write the Event section). iMatthew 22:05, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, no problem. Also, check out The Kliq's page. I organized the current projects section and changed the title. iMatthew 22:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

It's AWESOME. I just had an idea for Matt; why not give him Vengeance (2004) and we can finish Armageddon and then work on Taboo Tuesday. Do you like that idea or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate for you waiting on my return. ;) But, I'll tell you selling shoes to ungrateful people is the hardest thing for me. But, we can help Matt with Vengeance, that's if he would like Vengeance. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

One more match for Armageddon. Are you going to work on the Aftermath or would you like for me to do it? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. I guess it was worth a try. So, what Taboo Tuesday did you have in mind? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Just checkin'. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to do '05. Thoughts? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool. Hey, RR question; is it really necessary to note that HBK and 'Taker were the first two entrants in the Rumble match? P.S. Would it be cool if I replace the Rey Mysterio image with a Jeff Hardy one? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I'll remove the info. But, yeah, I think the image of Jeff as IC champion would probably fit the Event section, since this was his first WWE title opportunity. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:49, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, totally forgot that one. Thanks for the reminder. You know, the whole Finlay info., I think it should be added to the Event, stating that in the Rumble match, Finlay was disqualified for hitting people with the shaleigle. What do you think? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Hey, what is this "rollback" feature? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

IDK, it seems like a better tool to use. I'd like to have it, but I'm not sure if I'm "trusted" material for it. You know what I mean? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I would like to have it, that's if its still cool. :) What needs to be done? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, not to sound cocky or whatever, but since you approve of me being reliable, can you give it to me, since this is your decision. I mean, no hard feelings. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks and I PROMISE I will use it for good USE. If you see that I don't, then I guess as Administrator, you can remove it. But, I promise I won't use it for nonsense. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Cross my heart and... well you know the saying. ;) I'm almost done completing the last match for Armageddon, just have some patience with me. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. I'll try to help out in anyway I can. ;) P.S. *cough* 19-0. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely. They overcame a great team to advance to the playoffs, but their chance ends on Sunday, as the Patriots take the trophy once more. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Fo sho. Hey, for the 2 out of 3 falls match, do I write the entire match in one paragraph or do I separate them in three, ex: Street fight, Steel Cage, and Ladder match? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Gotcha. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

What do you make of this users edits? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I just wanted to let you know in advance, if the user continues with the edits. Matt says he'll take Vengeance '04, is that cool? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Go for it. As long as Armageddon has the HBK / HHH feud in, good for it. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I know, I trust your judgment. ;) I'll help in anyway I can. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Maybe after Taboo Tuesday, we can work on Vengeance '05. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool, glad that we agree. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I could use the challenge. (Yes) Maybe after, we can expand Royal Rumble '97... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:52, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Let's do it. Let's reserve it, before Gary takes it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

ABSOLUTELY. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter

The WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter Volume I, No. 4 - February 2008 January issue | March issue Project News There are now 3,485 Good Articles listed at WP:GA. The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 206 unreviewed articles. Out of 251 total nominations, 37 are on hold, 7 are under review, and 1 is seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance! The oldest unreviewed articles are: Johan Derksen, Trafford, J. Michael Bailey, Greg Skrepenak, Paleolithic-style diet, Alan Dershowitz, Natalee Holloway, Slovenian presidential election, 2007, San Francisco Municipal Railway, and Marcela Agoncillo. The top five categories with the largest backlogs are: Sports and recreation (57 articles), Theatre film and drama (34 articles), Music (19 articles), Transport (17 articles), Politics and government (16 articles), World history (13 articles), and Meteorology and atmospheric sciences (13 articles). The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 8 articles up for re-review. If every participant of WikiProject Good Articles could review just one article in the next week, the backlog would be almost eliminated! GA Sweeps Update During January, 57 Good Articles were reviewed. Including those articles that were under GAR or on hold, 35 were kept as GA, 20 delisted, 9 currently on hold or at GAR, and 3 were exempted as they are now Featured Articles. Reviewer of the Month Ealdgyth is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for January, based on the assessments made by Epbr123 on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Ealdgyth, known in real life as Victoria Short, hails from Central Illinois, and has been editing Wikipedia since May 26, 2007. In this short time, she has made significant contributions to 9 Good Articles, including Baldwin of Exeter and Hubert Walter. Her interests in editing are in the areas of the Middle Ages, History, and horses. Outside of Wikipedia, she is starting her own photography business, and owns three horses. She likes to read science fiction, history, and geneology books. Congratulations to our GAN Reviewer of the Month for January! Other outstanding reviewers recognized during the month of January include: AnonEMouse (talk · contribs) Canadian Paul (talk · contribs) Casliber (talk · contribs) Derek.cashman (talk · contribs) Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk · contribs) Drewcifer3000 (talk · contribs) Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) Johnfos (talk · contribs) M3tal H3ad (talk · contribs) Miranda (talk · contribs) Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs) VanTucky (talk · contribs) Member News There are now 176 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 15 new members that joined during the month of January: Atlantik (talk · contribs) Auawise (talk · contribs) Cyclonenim (talk · contribs) Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk · contribs) Ddstretch (talk · contribs) Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) FamicomJL (talk · contribs) Hamiltonstone (talk · contribs) jackturner3 (talk · contribs) Kbthompson (talk · contribs) Keilana (talk · contribs) Miranda (talk · contribs) pcbene (talk · contribs) Skeeker (talk · contribs) Snowolf (talk · contribs) This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all! On Hold versus Failing an Article This month, I thought I'd focus on a less technical and more of a procedural issue at WP:GAN – determining what the appropriate course of action to take when reviewing an article. Currently, there are four options to decide what to do with an article: Passing – it meets all six of the good article criteria; add it to WP:GA and add {{ArticleHistory}} or {{GA}} to the article's talk page. Failing it – it does not meet the criteria; remove the article's listing from WP:GAN and add {{ArticleHistory}} or {{failedGA}} to the article's talk page. On Hold – The article meets most of the criteria, but might fall short in a few areas; keep it listed at WP:GAN, add #: {{GAOnHold|ArticleName}} ~~~~ below the listing and add {{GAonhold}} to the article's talk page. Second Opinion – Similar to the on hold option, except an editor is either inexperienced or not knowledgeable enough about a given topic and asks another reviewer to offer another opinion before passing or failing; add #: {{GA2ndopinion|ArticleName}} ~~~~ to WP:GAN below the article's listing and add {{GA2ndoptalk}} to the article's talk page. So how to you know when an article fails outright, or fails initially, but meets "enough" of the criteria to be placed on hold? The answer to this question probably varies by about the same amount as there are reviewers of Good Articles! Everybody treats this slightly differently. The most important thing to consider is that articles should not be on hold for longer than about one week. Although there is no hard and fast time limit for this, most editors would probably agree that five to seven days is enough time to address any GA-related issues with the article to get it to pass. Some editors have extended this a few days in the past, due to other extenuating circumstances, such as an article's primary editor being very busy with school or work, so they have asked for extra time. But as a general rule, a GA nominee that is placed on hold should meet enough of the criteria to be able to be passed within five to seven days. Some examples of articles that might be placed on hold would be: the article is mostly complete, but might be missing one topic (subcategory). minor copyediting is required (needs a few minor manual of style, spelling, or grammatical fixes. mostly well sourced, but missing maybe a handful of references. a couple of images need to be tagged with appropriate copyright tags. On the other hand, an article should be failed if it: is missing several topic categories, or there are several sections which are very short (1-3 sentences per section). contains numerous sections which are just lists of information, as opposed to written out as prose. there's entire sections of text that have no references, or there are a lot of {{cn}} or {{unreferenced}} tags. has evidence of an active edit war in the article history. has major neutrality issues. has any {{cleanup}} or other warning tags in various places. Did You Know... ... that on July 19, 2007, 1,548 good articles that have not been categorized at all were categorized in 15 days? ... that in Chinese Wikipedia, articles need to have at least six net support votes before they are promoted to GA? ... that the English Wikipedia has the most Good Articles, the German Wikipedia has the second most (at over 2000), followed by the Spanish Wikipedia (at over 800), the Chinese Wikipedia (at over 400), and the French Wikipedia (at over 200)? ... that Simple English Wikipedia has zero Good Articles? ... that "Sport and games people" category has the most Good Articles? ... that Virginia Tech massacre (which is now a featured article) was promoted to GA just only about one month after the shooting incident, but took more than seven months to reach FA status? From the Editors Originally, I wasn't planning to do "Did you know" other than as a fill-in for Dr. Cash. However, I decided to continue writing this section until I ran out of ideas. OhanaUnited Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here. Dr. Cash Contributors to this Issue Dr. Cash (Lead Editor, Distributor) OhanaUnited (GA Sweeps and Did You Know correspondent) Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005! WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia. Nominations: Choctaw • One Night Stand (2007) • Justin Tuck • Tristan Tzara • Impalement arts Reassessment: Madonna (entertainer) • Sweeps / List: references (All Categories), image tags (All Categories), article quality (All Categories) Possible GAs Needing References: Clarinet • Carleton University • Appalachian Mountains Task forces: Project quality • Unreferenced GA Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations queue: 215 articles (44 of them are on hold) as of 08:00, 8 June 2008 | edit

Misuse of rollback

Don't use the rollback tool in the way you used it on No Way Out (2008) to remove spoilers. It is meant to be to revert vandalism, content disputes or otherwise use the undo tool preferably with a reason. Especially as spoilers are not against wikipedia policy and you are new to the tools I felt I needed to bring this to your attention. –– Lid^(Talk) 13:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

PPV

In what section? iMatthew 12:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, oops I skipped over that in your orginal message. Sorry about that. You're more than welcome to write that, although I'd still like individual credit for the expansion of the article if you don't mind. iMatthew 15:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Wait, I'm really sorry but I'm confused. Is Vengeance now a project between the two of us? iMatthew 15:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Ohh! *head stops spinning* I was confused when I saw Vengeance in your "Article Currently Expanding" section. Ok, you can write that feud, its not problem. Also, I like the look of your page, you should try the background in light green instead of purple. (My opinion) iMatthew 15:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, I'm working on Vengeance in my Sandbox so please make any changes there. iMatthew 15:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Why should the image be removed though? Also, what do you think about (The Kliq) getting WrestleMania XX and SummerSlam (2002) finished today, so we can focus on the other articles. iMatthew 15:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I need help with something else. I'd like my userpage to have my userboxes (not the ones that are hidden currently) on the right side of my page, and the writing on the left of that. Can you do this for me? iMatthew 16:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Take a look at my page. I would like all of the text (currently with an orange background), to be moved into the white background area. iMatthew 16:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I will change things, but that is EXACTLY what I needed you to do. Thanks! iMatthew 16:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For all of your hard work on improving the quality of many articles. Also, on becoming an Administrator! iMatthew 02:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Also, copying what I posted at WT:PW, User:CactusJack1234567 and User:CactusJack12345678 are two usernames being used by one person. This user is constantly vandalizing the WWE Roster page. iMatthew 02:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem! iMatthew 02:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I have. I wrote out the first couple of matches in the event section. More will come tomorrow. iMatthew 02:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok great! Also, are we working on Survivor Series (2007) now? Is SummerSlam (2002) finished? What about Royal Rumble (2008)? iMatthew 12:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, and thanks!! So for SummerSlam 02 and Royal Rumble, (in the table on my page), should I put "on hold"? iMatthew 13:06, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Btw, I agree with Truco's comment down there. I think you should change the font of your signature, to something more exciting. iMatthew 13:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

How about this: "  Cheers,   L   A   X "? iMatthew 13:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Whadda you think? iMatthew 13:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I guess. iMatthew 14:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. I want to do something to my sig, but I don't know what. iMatthew 14:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I found something I like!! iMatthew 2008 14:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

userbox

thanks. 4 some reason i couldn't get it on, pal. Baseball16 (talk) 15:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

next time i will use your advice, buddy. P.S. L.A.X. RULES Baseball16 (talk) 15:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Elimination Chamber/PPV

Idk, I have feelings that this article can be made similarly to the Royal Rumble article. But people want to merge them into a list of cage type matches. I think this match is to unique to be like that, and I finished sourcing most of the info. Comments?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Nikki as well since there have been alot of HiaC matches, and not all of them were on PPV, and if they were , not all of them have expanded articles. I think I suggested we move them to List of Hell in a Cell matches. Oh thanks, just need to finish sourcing the lead paragraph.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh man, Thanks. =) That means alot coming from you..Do you think the EC can be made to a future FL?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I know it has work, just in general whether it could. I guess we should wait for more EC matches, for more sources. So are you watching the superbowl?TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

The Pats', how about you?--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool, let's hope we win. Should I go ahead and move the HiaC matches to List of Hell in a Cell matches?TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Well isn't this what Nikkie meant?TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I will ask her. ThanksTrUCo⁹31¹ 22:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

It reads better now. One thing I saw,( I changed it) but you should not wikilink non-full dated dates (i.e. July 6) dates like that should not be wikilinked; July 6, 2007 would be better to be added and wikilinked. But good job on the article, I think you should nominate it for GA now or after you are done cleaning it up.TrUCo⁹31¹ 03:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh well, I remember a previous discussion about this and they were like you shouldn't but if that what WP:MOS says than it's alright. You can revert my edits if you want, cuz I wikilinked almost all the dates =), what do you think of the new newsletter format? Go to WP:PWN and look at the February 3rd edition..TrUCo⁹31¹ 03:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Well I took the format from the WP:GAN and I thought it was a good idea because the original took up to much space, it made your talkpage longer. I say we see what people say about it, and if their are no complaints It will be the same format from now on. Did you write the event section for SS 07? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

If you follow the December to Dismember (2006) article event section, you can easily write the event section. Because the event sections of PPV should not detail move by move, it should give a brief description of the match, like we did at Survivor Series (2007). For all the PPV's I expanded, I have followed the D2D 06 PPV.

TrUCo⁹31¹ 04:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, you told me when we were working on Survivor Series (2007) =). You can also look at No Way Out (2004), that event section follows D2D event section well. I can give you more advice on it when you are writing one if you like..TrUCo⁹31¹ 04:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Feels weird telling an admin advice =)..lol

TrUCo⁹31¹ 04:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm...Mine...just joking. Mine is unique, but yours is colorful. I really can't decide because alot of members have colorful signatures.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 04:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Yea theirs are good 2. You should change yours =DTrUCo⁹31¹ 04:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Idk, update it. Like I did to mine, remember I had the checkered BG and then I completely revamped it? You should do the same. If you want to change it, I can change it for you.

TrUCo⁹31¹ 04:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I will work on that tommorow, i want to go ZzZzZzZzZzZzZz. Buenas NochesTrUCo⁹31¹ 04:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

It looks good, just when you say that they hit Move A, you want to follow that with saying that they pinned him, to better inform the reader on how the wrestler one. But other than that its good, better than before.TrUCo⁹31¹ 14:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, about your signature, do you like Matt's design? Or tell me what kind of design you desire and I will see if I can try tot get/make it.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I guess you should just keep it yours if you want.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

They look great you are getting the hang of this, just a few things I saw, I saw a couple spelling errors, (sorry wasn't able to fix them on my own), also in my view I think that when you write the result of the match you should say something like this "Umaga would then regain control of the match and hit the Samoan spike on Kennedy, leading Umaga to successfully pin Kennedy, thus winning the match and retaining the Intercontinental Championship." or something like that because when you write the move they used to win, and then the pin and result, the paragraph flows more (but this is just my view).TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:22, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Me 2, but now I see that it's only 1 spelling error. Did you intend to use the word "lefty" in the Mysterio match?TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, ok. Just keep doing what you did in those matches to the rest of the event section of SS.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Previous Issue | The Wikipedia: WikiProject Professional Wrestling Newsletter | Next Issue

The WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter Issue X — February 3, 2008 Project News New Year's Revolution (2007) failed its Featured article nomination. Its nomination page can be found here. AJPW Unified World Tag Team Championship failed its Featured list nomination. Its nomination page can be found here. Royal Rumble (2005) has been listed for Peer review. Please review this article and make suggestions on how it can be improved before being nominated for Good Article status. The peer review can be found here. Don Kent (wrestler), No Way Out (2004), Unforgiven (2004), Lisa Marie Varon, Torrie Wilson, SummerSlam (1994), and Ricky Banderas are currently Good article candidates. Briscoe Brothers and King of the Ring (1994) have been elevated to Good article status. Member News Based on the members list, there are currently 327 members participating in WikiProject Professional wrestling. Based on the active members list, there are currently 32 members currently active in WikiProject Professional wrestling. NOTICE: If you are actively editing and contributing to articles under the scope of WikiProject Professional Wrestling, we suggest you add your name to the list of active members. On the calendar: Feb. 10 - TNA presents Against All Odds Feb. 18 - WWE presents No Way Out Feb. 28 - Zenlax's birthday Current Events Former TNA professional wrestler Chris Harris has officially signed with World Wrestling Entertainment as confirmed by himself in his personal website. Ron Killings and The Big Show are still being reported as to having signed WWE contracts. As there is no reliable source for anything of the sort, be prepared for their names to be continually added to the WWE Roster article and information about their returns being added to their own articles. There is also apparently an audio interview with Killings where he states he will be returning to WWE with his old K-Kwik gimmick. Bobby Lashley is being reported to have been released by WWE. His profile has been removed from WWE.com. But again, there is no reliable source for his release, so be prepared to revert his removal from the roster article and edits to his own article. Collaboration of the Week The monthly featured article collaboration for February 3 through February 16 is Shawn Michaels. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, February 17. Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved! Member Interview This week's interviewees are Zenlax (link) and ThinkBlue (link). Next week's interviewees are Kris Classic and Alex Roggio. Submit a question to ask them here. Articles for Deletion Current: Category:Jillian Hall albums; Category:WrestleMania venues; WWE Byte This! Kept: Velvet Sky. Deleted: Mike Posey; Randy Dodge; The Pit Bulls; Schmitty Robinson; Brandon Smith; K.C. James and Idol Stevens; Mikey Nicholls; SlamTV!; Category:World Wrestling Entertainment model to appear in Playboy Professional Wrestling Article Stats *The number of stub articles increased this week, but a large jump in the number of total articles means that the percentage of stub articles still dropped from 21.63% to 21.51%. Please check out the stub article subpage to see what you can help with (even if you can only add a reference or two). Professional wrestling articles Importance Top High Mid Low None Total Quality FA 2 3 5 FL 1 5 15 21 GA 4 16 39 59 B 1 13 63 204 281 Start 2 53 221 2350 2626 Stub 1 24 604 629 Assessed 3 72 331 3215 3621 Unassessed 1 1 Total 3 72 331 3215 1 3622 From the Editors Contributors to this Issue: GaryColemanFan (talk · contribs) Gavyn Sykes (talk · contribs) iMatthew (talk · contribs) LAX (talk · contribs) ThinkBlue (talk · contribs) Tromboneguy0186 (talk · contribs) Discussion • Suggestions • Feedback You are receiving this because because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. By default, the full newsletter is sent to your talk page. However, you have several delivery options at your disposal. Below are the options: Notification of newsletter Newsletter opt-out Delivered: 18:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Survivor Series (2002)

Hi LAX, hope your doing well with the admin tools! First off, just a quick note that I won't be doing much in content development work this week, but will be doing lots of work from the 9th - 17th February on Wikipedia. Secondly, I don't know whether this will interest you while improving the Survivor Series 2002 article, but I have found the whole of a RAW episode from the week before Survivor Series on YouTube which may help you. If you wish, I can provide you a link to it's location. Cheers, D.M.N. (talk) 19:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Feuds

Nice job with the Armageddon feuds. ;) Sorry if I didn't log in yesterday, but I had a pre-Super Bowl party and well the rest is history. ;) But, I will finish the last match, I promise you that. P.S. Patriots are so gonna win. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

For our next project..what do you think about Taboo Tuesday (2004). For "The Kliq". All five of us on this one.? iMatthew 2008 22:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Now me and iMatthew have brought up the idea of doing the group project (all Kliq members) doing Over the Edge 1998, and then Taboo Tuesday 2004, and then WrestleMania XIX.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 22:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Why wont' you be able to work on OTE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truco9311 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh because you don't have that much knowledge? Well I can work on the background section and you can work on the event/aftermath section. But blue still has to agree.TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

That'll be ok. Now we just need Blue's opinion. Is DMN really in the kliq, he rarly speaks to us and makes contributions to the Kliq.TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't mind, as long as he keeps in touch with us. TrUCo⁹31¹ 23:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Also do you mind if Jjkr joined us in writing a PPV? He is new and my adoptee.TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you want to start in the Royal Rumble '97? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

LAX, please go voice your opinion in the discussions at "The Kliq"'s talk page. iMatthew 2008 01:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Nevermind, I see you've done so. iMatthew 2008 01:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Let's start. But, we need to finish the Aftermath for Armageddon. Or do we wait a while? P.S. Go Pats. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Hey, I was wondering if I can work on the feuds for the Rumble. Is that okay or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, can I work on that feud or do you want to do it? P.S. Who's going to invite Zenlax to the Kliq? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. ;) Umm, well like I told Truco, adding him without him knowing doesn't really make any sense, if you'd like I'll help you in inviting him. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, seems like the undercard matches. Anyways, what type of invitation did you have in mind and where would you like to create it at? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, let's work on the invitation on your sandbox. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I know. :( I just hope that the Patriots don't let the Giants beat them. P.S. I can't find any of the "thank you for supporting me on my RFA" templates, can you? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I found one, but we need to tweak it... more. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, let's start tweaking. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

What colors did you have in mind? P.S. 14-10. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I know, I just threw my Patriots jersey to the ground. Hey, do you think we can use this image, but tweak it like "The Kliq wants you" or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Ugggg, Matt just rub it in, since he's a Giants fan. Anyways, I've asked Matt just to invite Zenlax to join, that way you and I can start working on the Rumble. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, good night. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, you guys can still work on that, but once your down, Zenlax can move onto another project, I told him he was welcome to choose any. iMatthew 2008 11:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Well I do have school today (keeping me away for about 10 hours. I'll be back after school though. Bye! iMatthew 2008 11:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! May I write the event section? iMatthew 2008 21:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Awesome. Also, let's not even think about starting another PPV until at least half of that list (on the kliq's page) is completed. iMatthew 2008 21:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi.

User:Truco9311 asked me to introduce myself to you, so here I am. I'm Jjkr, and I look forward to working with you. :) Jjkr (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Projects

Hey, LAX, just wanted to thank you for inviting me to join your editing group and you'd be happy to know that I've added myself to two projects. Also, this came to mind, the 2005 Taboo Tuesday article has been created by a User:Cimmo and I just wanted to let you know first hand that the user most likely took the article, but if not then I'll be more than happy to expand the article. Zenlax ^{T C S} 19:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, you're welcome on the notice. Then, can the article be expanded between the group? Also, just wanted to let you know that I'm all better and I'm starting to work on the event section for WrestleMania 21. Also, I like your userpage design, that I'd like for it to be on my userpage, but I'm having problems with it; if its alright, do you think you can help me with correcting the problem? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely, if anymore are needed then I think they should be included. The colors I would like to use would be in the Green range; one in particular would be the color Forest Green. And thank you for taking your time to help me out. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Of course; the black color I would like to substitute with Forest Green, the purple color I would like to replace it with Yellow Green and for the Userboxes / Barnstars I would like for the background to be replaced with Olive Drab. That's basically all the colors that I see that would need to be replaced with. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, for one the color doesn't show or my iPhone has problems the with color settings. But, if you look at the Olive drab article, the color is shown there. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, if its no bother. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Again, if its no bother. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Good point. Do you think that the code number #800080 might be a great replacement for Forest Green? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I don't want to get into a three revert rule, but is User:Dlae's edits to Randy Orton's article, good edits? And no problem with the questions, since you do indeed need to ask them. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

That'd be fine. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd have to see it your way. What colors did you have in mind? Zenlax ^{T C S} 19:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Then we'll go with your direction. Or better yet, why not surprise me. Zenlax ^{T C S} 19:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh no, take your time; I don't expect you to finish it all in one day. I understand you are currently working on other projects and I wouldn't want to take you off your tasks. Before I forget, I added a show and hide feature to the Other on-screen talent table and I hope it will not be a problem. Zenlax ^{T C S} 19:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Wow. You are busy. This might sound like a stupid question but, I'll ask it anyway; I was actually thinking of expanding Backlash (2004), after I'm done with WrestleMania XX and 21, and my question to you is do I have to ask someone to help me expand it or can I work on it? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'd be happy for your company and I know I have a long way to go in finishing the WrestleMania's, which probably gives you time to work on your projects and gives us the time to work on it. Though, I wouldn't want to come between something you and Blue discussed in expanding. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Then, count me in. One more thing, I've asked Blue to finish the event for WrestleMania 21, is that alright with you? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll too, have some free time in my hands. But, first things first. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

This place looks eerily familiar ...

;-) Congrats on the adminship. -- Oakster  Talk  22:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Well since it's my first expansion, I wanted to give a good try at expanding the article. That being said I'm more than welcome for any contributions from other Wikipedians, so go ahead. -- Oakster  Talk  11:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure. -- Oakster  Talk  23:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Taboo

So, Zenlax told me that Cimmo created the article? Does this guy seriously listen? Anyways, I'll be working on the Rumble article and if you need helping on Taboo Tuesday, just hit me up. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Was that the last "You have new messages"? Uh, yeah sure. Why? Did you want to work on the other feuds? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Go for it, as long as I have the HBK and Sid feud. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, cool. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Damn, this is harder than I thought. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, for one, I'm trying to see what started the feud between the two, but somehow it goes back to 1995, where Shawn blamed Sid for costing him the WWE title at WrestleMania XI and I can't find any refs. when Shawn became the number one contender to face Sid at the Rumble. I guess, I will need help. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

OMG, I know. I was going to copy and edit some stuff similar to the Rumble '94, but I don't know what started it all. And yeah, if you go to Sid's article, it says after the night after WrestleMania XI, Sid turned on Shawn. Maybe we will have to need some pointers from Gary. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:07, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you want to ask him together or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I am sooo tired. I just finished writing the entire event section for Taboo Tuesday. (It took me about an hour, but thats ok.) I'm getting off for tonight, as I'm very tired now. Maybe tomorrow night, I'll work on OTE or Vengeance, not sure yet. iMatthew 2008 02:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you prune the four nominations from COTW that need to be pruned? Hornswoggle, Mr.McMahon, Chris Jericho, and Jimmy Snuka. iMatthew 2008 11:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, no problem. iMatthew 2008 11:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Let's ask him together. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Let's ask him if he remembers anything from 1997 and pointers on where to get the "refs" for the article. That's what I came up with. Suggestions? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Good news. Gary said he will help us out with the feuds for the Rumble, but he's working on some stuff and we can place RR on hold. What do you think? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Your cheating on me? Just kidding. Jeez, you unstoppable PPV maniac. Do you have time for all of those PPV's? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, don't go at it alone. Do you need help on SummerSlam? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I'll look at the reports and see what I can do. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, Kliq member. ;) Remember our motto, "You don't have to go at it alone". --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I cut some info., is that okay or do you want me to cut some more? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

You did better than me. ;) Congrats. Any other help? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Hit me when you need me. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm down. But, what are we going to do with Armageddon 2002? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Hey, after your done with SummerSlam, do you mind in helping me fix Unforgiven '04? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:24, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. ;) Hey, what's the deal with Dlae? Seriously. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

O-M-G. I was going to warn him, cause he seemed to undo, basically the same stuff he continued to go on, but I didn't want a "confrontation". Anyways, what article do you want to finish? (that the Kliq started) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Well if you'd like I'll help you with the Aftermath for Armageddon. Just, tell me what feuds should be included and... bingo. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. But, did Shawn and Triple H continued their feud? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Well if they continued to feud, then I can work on that. How does that sound? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. ;) If not, I'll see what big feud happened after Armageddon. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

For Unforgiven or WrestleMania? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Breaking News: Tromboneguy0186 took Backlash '04. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, just thought I should have said something. ;) Um, yeah. I'll work on the Aftermath for WM21, if that's cool. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

'Mania

Ok, I'm basically done WrestleMania XX, but I just need additional citations and ideas for the notes section, and Zenlax can hopefully expand the aftermath a lil' moreTrUCo⁹31¹ 01:41, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

The Austin and ECW match/segments are very good. You really got the hang of it. Now for the Women's battle royal...Battle Royals/elimination matches/royal rumble tend to be long, especially if they have alot of competitors. So in this case, the women's battle royal may have to stay as is since there are many eliminations.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, mayby a few rewording, but it should remain that length because of those reasons. Well if you remember when we wrote Survivor Series (2007), I wrote the SS elimination match in that length.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Man, we have too many projects...WAY TOO MANY!--TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Excellent! Those type of matches should only list the eliminations and that is it. I think one we r done all these projects we should work only on 1 a week to make them a GA/FA.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Totally...--TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you watch User:Save Us 229, he is kinda holding a grudge against me for kinda proving a point about dirt sheet websites. Check my user page for more info, he has removed all my comments and a warning about personally attacking me here at this link [3] TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, as I try to avoid conflicts.TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:50, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, cuz they went crazy on me look at their final comment on my talk page, then look at their talk page history and look at their edit summaries. I even apologized for no reason and they went off like that, then they removed that warning i mentioned earlier. Wow, owning the WWE roster page, very interesting. I want to say so many words here but I know I can't.TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

You know what, to avoid major conflict, I think im going to take a short semi wiki break.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 02:06, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I dont know if I am taking one, it' just an idea thrown out there. This little epidemic has never happened before and is making me have thoughts of retirement from wiki..but I think i will let it go..--TrUCo⁹31¹ 02:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but I don't think now is a good time for a break. LOL..he removed your comments as well, "suggest you leave too"...TrUCo⁹31¹ 02:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

8th Horseman? Oops, wrong stable.

The Kliq huh? Mind if I join? I've been looking at your works and I must say, NICE JOB! Hope you got room for an 8th member. -- bulletproof ^3:16 04:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Discussion is on the Kliq's talk page =] iMatthew 2008 11:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Can you go close that discussion. bulletproof is in! iMatthew 2008 22:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'd possibly like to write the event section for OTE 98. I'd like to try to get WMXX finished, and maybe even SummerSlam 02. Can you help me with Vengeance 2004. I thought I could do it myself, but I have too much going on that it will end up never getting done. I need some help with it. iMatthew 2008 14:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I see. I think that The Kliq should vote somebody to be the leader (like the GM). We need somebody to act like the manager of The Kliq. The person would have to always update The Kliq's main page, help out on all of the projects. Stuff like that. iMatthew 2008 14:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Great, I'll set it up on The Kliq's talk page. iMatthew 2008 14:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, but I think we should be able to state something like a proposal of why you would want yourself (in general) to be voted at the leader. iMatthew 2008 15:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Talk to me some more; about my "ownership of the Randy Orton article"

^Dlae│_here 16:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep talking... ^Dlae│_here 17:18, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage NHRHS2010 20:20, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Spam filter

Oh, never mind. I was trying to fix the citation next to his birth name and a page redirected me to a "Spam filter notice" which explained that the website, www.100megsfree4.com, was a spam link to the article. No worries, though, I removed them from the article. Sorry if I bothered you with my nonsense. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding. :) Any suggestions on what more to add to the aftermath of WrestleMania XX, as I am currently confused on what more to add. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Right. Thank you for all the information that I need to include. Would it also be necessary to include Angle's "accident" on the April 15 edition of SmackDown! Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll get to it right away. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

New poll up at The Kliq's talk page iMatthew 2008 15:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't see why not. I can make sometime to work in the event or the aftermath. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks

.: RFA thanks :.

Thanks for supporting me! My RfA passed with a final tally of 5 neutrals, 1 oppose and 148 supports, a turnout I couldn't have dreamed of. I'm going to do everything I can to help out the community, help with sysop tasks, and of course, contribute to the encyclopedia. If you ever need a hand with something, feel free to give a shout! Cheers! Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 17:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

User:3bulletproof16

bullet was recently blocked for apparently posting what IMO no reason at all (here is the apparent edit that the blocking admin cited: [4]). Since you are obviously familiar with the Hornetman situation, could you review this? TJ Spyke 05:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, and he emailed me to tell you if you can review the block for a second opinion of an admin.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 15:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

LAX, please don't unblock Bulletproof if you are thinking of doing that. If you did, other admins would come along and suggest that there's a connection between you and Bulletproof, as you are both wrestling editors and it wouldn't go down well on your side. I suggest you read this before even thinking of unblocking. D.M.N. (talk) 15:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, I agree. But he just asked for a review not an actual unblock.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

FYI

Cross-posted to other Kliq members

Please see the note on my userpage. Any comments for helping with content development for the forthcoming week (until Saturday at least) will be rejected on request. I am basically taking a "Mini-Break". Regards, D.M.N. (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Acceptably verified?

Greetings, I am aware of a general situation pertaining to Jack Henry & Associates and as hard as such things are to verify on the web, I believe I found a reference verifying it. However, one of their employees is quite adamant in his disagreement. So I am seeking a neutral opinion. Do you feel the reference here is adequate? If not, I want to retract the entry. Jack Henry & Associates#Criticism & Controversy. Thanks for your time! --Pearrari (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm just asking if, in your opinion, the reference meets WP standards. It was challenged by someone in their marketing department. It is probably his job to ensure the web only lists glorious things about their products. They're probably sensitive about this issue, too. There are lots of companies offering development support for their product. Don't see that for competing solutions. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that those companies wouldn't exist if their services weren't needed. Nonetheless, it seemed appropriate to request a second opinion. --Pearrari (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Wiki freinds

Hey LAX, do you like LAX the tagteam? hey I do not know how to write your name like you do but could you please sighn your name on my user page were it say's Wiki User i'm cool with. Thanks, Steelerfan-94 18:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC).

Headlines

P.S. Happy Valentine's Day. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

OMG, I thought you died. Just kidding. Umm, I'm pretty sure you know the whole bulletproof controversy, if not go to WP:PW and read the "info". Umm, there's a new poll at the Kliq page, go vote. And, me and Zenlax are currently working on Vengeance '05 and welcome back. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, do you just want to create the Armageddon article and leave it for someone else to finish it or... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:39, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool. The reason I bring it up, is because maybe someone else might be interested in finishing the Aftermath section. But, don't make Armageddon your priority. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

What about the Event? You know my history. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, you are better than me when it comes to the Event. Did you have a PPV in mind that you want to work on? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I would say '04, since I did write Unforgiven and be easier to work on. You're welcome, I just wanted to spread the "love" cheer. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'll take the Event or we can work on it. Either way, I would probably try to copy Zenlax's "event" settings. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

OMG, I don't make sense. What I meant was, trying to write the Event the same way he's writing it for Vengeance. Do I make sense, now? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I've had a bunch of chocolates and it seems I'm a bit off. When do you want to work on SummerSlam? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:21, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. I'll try look for some refs. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Wow, you sound excited. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm, why? Is SummerSlam your "main" PPV? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, HAHAHAHA. Nice. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, snap. I'll start looking for some refs. and start on the Event or do I start in the Aftermath? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm on it. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks and thank God for copy and editing. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank YOU, I don't think its notable either. Well, I copied it from Unforgiven and pasted it to SummerSlam. I'm so lazy. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Cimmo wants to take Backlash 2005. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Aww, are you gonna do something? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Seriously, man. No offense whatsoever. What other feuds took place, besides the Orton and Benoit feud? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I'll go through that. Anymore? Oh, would it be important to add in the Aftermath that Shawn returned at Unforgiven? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I'll start looking for info. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

How does the Aftermath look so far? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:17, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I know. I still haven't finished the feud yet. I will, though. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for the heads-up. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 03:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Is that our info. or his? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

What a jerk. Anyways, I'll probably finish the Aftermath for SummerSlam. Are you still working on the feuds? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

SummerSlam..... 2004. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Just wanted to make sure. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:53, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't mind. Maybe after SummerSlam, you and I can work on improving Randy Orton's article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool. You know, you and I make a great team. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

True that. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to disappoint, but no. I wanted to, but I already made a promise. Hope you guys won't hate me, for not going. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I know, I had the tickets and all. But, I might get a chance to go to a PPV later in the year. So... --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I would have, especially the seats that I had. :( OMG, I think he's looking at the Kliq's page and creating the articles. Let's delete.... now. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, remove the info. from our sandboxes and see how he does. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

You tell him. ;) Watch out with Vengeance 2004, he might do the same. Do you need help with any other PPV's? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:40, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

That sucks. :( That has happened to me before. But remember your not alone. ;) But if you need help, you know what to do. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright. Its great that we understand each other. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Was there any controversy between Cena and Booker? (for SummerSlam) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, cause I read that their match was a Best of 5 match and I assumed that they had a feud for it. But, whatever. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I think it be notable to add, for example if Cena lost the title, then I think it should be added, but if he was able to retain the title, then I guess it shouldn't be added. I probably didn't make sense with this. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Never mind. I just ended up reading that Cena won the Best of 5 match at No Mercy. But, he lost it on the October 7 edition of SmackDown. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

IDK, do you want me to? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!

User:Wilhelmina Will has wished you a happy Valentine's day, and good luck in love and friendship!

A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Owen Hart pic

Is this pics licensing correct? The source doesn't come from a WWF website and I doubt the WWF would release that pic as a publicity photo, if they in fact took the photograph. --Endless Dan 14:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

That licensing is not correct either. They never showed any of Owen's footage during the pay-per-view. Also, the pic appears to be coming from the crowd. I think you should take it down. --Endless Dan 18:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

To be honest, you'd probably be more privy to what (if any) licenses apply. I saw OTE live back in the day and I can tell you for a fact that image wasn't shown on the ppv. And I don't believe the WWF would ever release that sort of picture. There's no way releasing something like that could benefit them. Based on where the pic is coming from and from where it was taken, it looks like someone took the pic from the crowd. I don't think there is a license that can apply to this pic. --Endless Dan 18:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Cool. I've taken notice to you always messing with images (including deleting some of mine!), so I figured you'd know what to do. --Endless Dan 18:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Backlash

Are we still on for creating the article? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I would say, to create the article. What about yourself? Another dumb question from me; do you know what a "brawling" match is? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I can make time for Backlash. As for the "brawling" match, I have no clue what it means. That's why I asked. What would you like to work on Backlash? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Its fine by me. May I work on the event? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. Will you start on the article now? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

You will have to excuse me for a couple of minutes, as I am still working on the event section for Vengeace. I will contribute, I promise you that. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Would you like me to create Backlash or is it a loading problem? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I thought it was something technical. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

If its no problem. I'll start on the event this afternoon. Is that alright with you? Zenlax ^{T C S} 14:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. Then I'll see you this afternoon. Zenlax ^{T C S} 14:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm in the process of starting the event. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Great, we are in the right track. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Couple of matches, I don't think I'll be done and be able to move on to the aftermath. What about yourself? Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem, as long as something is done then something is added to the section. Also, I'd like to add that following this weekend I will be out of town and won't be back until Tuesday, the reason I mention this is for you not to work the article all alone. Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Well it seems that we too will be quite busy and thank you for understanding. :) Zenlax ^{T C S} 20:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Couldn't of said it better myself. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I've just been over some of your articles and I've noticed your edits to the event sections have more report to them; would you like for me to add a little more to the event or is it just fine the way it is? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Not to start conflict, but yes and no. Again, I don't want a problem between us. But, I just wanted your word and see if you wanted to add more to the report. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Did I go to far with my comments? Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough. Zenlax ^{T C S} 21:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Revelation Theory

Sorry, but could you please add a more specific tag to this article? It's on my watchlist and it's unclear to me what needs to be cleaned up. Chubbles (talk) 21:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: No Mercy (2006)

I was thinking about adding in a part about the Mysterio/Chavo feud, but I don't know. The background's already pretty long, and I'm just concerned that adding in more will make it too long. What do you think though? ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to give it a shot, but I'll definately give you a shout-out if I get stuck. ;) thanks for the help though! ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I will. I'm just trying to get everything down to start with, so I don't have to keep reading through match reports, etc, and then I'll refine it a later stage. It won't be going into the mainspace like that, that's for sure. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

No worries. I appreciate the feedback. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I know you're busy but i was wondering if you could spare the time to give the event part of my expansion attempt of No Way (2006) a look over. I've rewritten it, but I'm not sure whether I should post it into the mainspace yet. fell free to make any necessary changes, etc, and let me know what'cha think. Thanks in advance! Regards, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, great. Thanks so much for all your help! really appreciate it. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 01:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Re Image:Triple-H-Spritz-Temp.jpg

Yep, delete away! --jjron (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)