User talk:LawrieM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Macauley Island.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Macauley Island.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Macauley Island.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Macauley Island.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BrownCow • (how now?) 19:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Curtis Island and Lady Penryhn

See answer on my talk page andy 11:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Dent1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dent1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:PennatiaBaylisiana.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:PennatiaBaylisiana.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:PennatiaBaylisiana.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:PennantiaBaylisiana.jpg. The copy called Image:PennantiaBaylisiana.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:PoorKnightsIslands.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:PoorKnightsIslands.PNG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:AgathisSpathulata.jpg

Hi Lawrie - unfortunately, this is a species of Araucaria (probably Araucaria bidwillii), not Agathis spathulata. - MPF 08:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi Lawrie - yep, it is definitely an Araucaria. My guess is that maybe some labels in the park got switched (maybe accidentally at planting, or maybe vandalism) and the Agathis spathulata specimen is somewhere else nearby. Agathis spathulata is very different in appearance, with much broader leaves arranged in opposite pairs (quite similar to other kauri species, most like Agathis robusta) - MPF 20:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)