User talk:Lawrencekhoo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Leave me messages here!

Contents

[edit] No problem

It is very rare to find someone who has been registered as long as you have who has never been communicated with on her or his talk page. Kukini hablame aqui 17:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah well, we wikignomes toil in obscurity, while elves like you get all the glory :D --lk 17:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
LOL...GLORY!!--Kukini hablame aqui 01:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Kukini/Welcome

Feel invited to copy it and make it your own. Thanks for the heads up!--Kukini hablame aqui 00:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

I have written you a reply on my discussion page. Smarred Wolet 12:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello Again

Another reply awaits one.Smarred Wolet 01:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Another Greeting

Hello, for the third time, I wrote something on my talk page a while ago, I can understand If you didn't have time to reply or even read it, but shall we reignite the discussion? It would be a good idea. Smarred Wolet (talk) 16:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Ignore me, I'm stupid, the comment has been deleted so theres no point carrying on. Nice talking to you though. Smarred Wolet (talk) 00:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jevons paradox

I did not remove your Energy Policy reference, I just moved it to a different paragraph. I thought you would appreciate that -- I thought the Greening and Potter references should be together as they address the same issue.

CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maya Soetoro-Ng

Being the half-sister of a presidential candidate and a member of his campaign staff does not make someone notable. I was being bold, but if you would prefer, we can send the article through AFD. --Bobblehead (rants) 17:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Huckabee Merge Proposal

Please comment on merging Mike Huckabee controversies into Mike Huckabee here [[1]] Jmegill (talk) 09:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The China Study RFD

That you for your comment to keep The China Study. A user has created a new article titled Vegetarianism in China and recently added a See Also link to that article from the The China Study. It is possible that Vegetarianism in China has been created with the intent of casting doubt on the information provided in The China Study. I was wondering what you thought. Best wishes, Michael H 34 (talk) 15:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Michael H 34

[edit] Jevon's paradox

Hi, and thanks for making contact on my Talk page. It's late and I will look forward to reading your comments when I am fresh in the morning... Johnfos (talk) 11:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Original Research

Your edit to "Objections to Evolution" seems factually accurate. Unfortunately, it is also original research. Can you cite an authority that makes the same argument?Kww (talk) 13:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

I've modified and added citations. Suggestions for improvement? lk (talk) 13:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
It would be best if you could find someone that explicitly says that this was a falsifiable test of evolution, or people could accuse you of synthesis. What you have is fine for the individual facts, but doesn't strongly support the conclusion.Kww (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
The arguments are made by Douglas Theobald in 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: Scientific "Proof" - the reference that immediately precedes the words "For example," in my edit. lk (talk) 14:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Requesting your input at Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive

Since you are a member of WikiProject Economics, I would like to direct your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive. We are currently deciding on an economics-related article to bring to Featured Article status and we would like your input. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 14:44, 12 May 2008 (UTC)