Talk:Law school
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of education and education-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to featured and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details. |
| Portal | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Separate law school from law school in the United States
I've separated the two articles. I think "law school" needs its own treatment as it is used elsewhere than the US and it also is frequently used to refer to legal education in general. --PullUpYourSocks 20:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- I thought this split was a bad idea to begin with, and time is proving me right. Now we have a huge redundant overlapping mess between [[law school and Law school in the United States. Anyone have the time to clean this up? Thought not. Way to go, PullUpYourSocks.
- The better solution at this point is to get rid of Law school in the United States through AfD and then fix this article so it is more inclusive. --Coolcaesar (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Don't Go
Read this guy's experience. --172.131.95.100 16:17, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] There is a lot of garbage in this article in violation of WikiProject:Countering systemic bias
The article Law school in the United States was created specifically because Law school was becoming too U.S.-specific. Now there is a lot of U.S.-specific junk accumulating in this article again. If someone doesn't generalize those statements to cover all or most law schools worldwide and support those assertions with citations to reliable sources, I am deleting them in a couple of weeks.
If any of the people who inserted those bad statements into this article is too damned lazy or busy to bring them into compliance with WikiProject:Countering systemic bias, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:Verifiability, then that's just too bad. As Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not states, Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Go get yourself a blog. --Coolcaesar (talk) 07:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
