Talk:LAW 80

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Associated task forces (general topics):
	Military technology and engineering task force
	Weaponry task force

[edit] Spotting rifle

"Upon firing, the .22 cartridge case sets back out of the 7.62 mm casing", I cannot understand this statement. Can someone expand on it? What is "sets back out" mean? Maury 12:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Rather than me trying to explain it, look at this link [1] - the spotting rifle from the LAW 80 was used on the SMAW. I've never seen this system used before, would be nice to get some non-copyright pictures for the article. Riddley 00:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

I have reworded the sentance slightly to try to clarify the action. Hopefully this is an improvement? --Mlongcake 11:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)